Hearing Protection Act Language Incorporated Into Comprehensive Sportsmen’s Bill

Hearing Protection Act
Hearing Protection Act

American Suppressor AssociationWASHINGTON, D.C.-(Ammoland.com)- The House Committee on Natural Resources has scheduled a hearing for the morning of June 14, in which the Federal Lands Subcommittee will hear a discussion draft of the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement (SHARE) Act. The SHARE Act, which is being championed in a bipartisan manner by Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus (CSC) Co-Chairs Representative Jeff Duncan (R-SC), and Representative Gene Green (D-TX), is a comprehensive package that covers a wide range of hunting, fishing, and outdoor related issues. Included in the legislation is Title XVII, a strengthened version of the Hearing Protection Act.

Since the re-introduction of the Hearing Protection Act by Rep. Duncan and Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID) in January (H.R. 367, S. 59) the American Suppressor Association (ASA) has met with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) on multiple occasions to discuss technical amendments to the language. As a result, we were able to create several technical amendments that were incorporated into the current draft of the SHARE Act. These include:

  • Sec. 1702: Removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act, subjecting them to the same instant NICS background check as long guns, and issuing a refundable tax credit to anyone who has purchased a suppressor since the HPA’s original date of introduction
  • Sec. 1703: Ensuring that suppressors will remain legal in all 42 states where they are currently legal, after suppressors are removed from the National Firearms Act
  • Sec. 1704: Preempting states from levying taxes or registration requirements on suppressors. However, this will not make suppressors legal in any state where state law currently prohibits them.
  • Sec. 1705: Granting the ATF 365 days to destroy all suppressor related records from the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR)
  • Sec. 1706: Developing a “keystone part” definition, and requiring that such keystone part is serialized on every suppressor. This will ensure that individual suppressor parts, like pistons and endcaps, will not require serialization.
  • Sec. 1707: Imposing a 10% Pittman-Robertson excise tax on the manufacture of each new suppressor, a tax that is currently imposed on all Title I firearms

“The inclusion of the Hearing Protection Act in the sportsmen’s package highlights the commitment of the Sportsmen’s Caucus to make the hunting and recreational shooting experiences safer and more enjoyable for all,” said Knox Williams, President and Executive Director of the American Suppressor Association. “We know for a fact that exposure to noise from recreational firearms is one of the leading causes of hearing loss, which is why the CDC, NIOSH, and the National Hearing Conservation Association (NHCA) have all recommended using suppressors as a tool to mitigate the danger. We look forward to working with the Sportsmen’s Caucus to make this legislation a reality.”

Suppressors have been federally regulated since the passage of the National Firearms Act of 1934. Currently, prospective buyers must live in one of the 42 states where they are legal, must send in an application including fingerprints and passport photos to the ATF, pay a $200 transfer tax, and wait for an indeterminate amount of time for the ATF to process the application. As of June, 2017, wait times are in excess of 10 months. In stark contrast, many countries in Europe place no regulations on their purchase, possession, or use. This legislation will remove suppressors from the onerous requirements of the NFA, and instead require purchasers to pass an instant NICS check, the same background check that is used during the sale of long guns. In doing so, law-abiding citizens will remain free to purchase suppressors, while prohibited persons will continue to be barred from purchasing or possessing these accessories.

To voice your support for the Hearing Protection Act, visit www.HearingProtectionAct.com.


The American Suppressor Association (ASA) is the unified voice of the suppressor industry. Our mission is to unite and advocate for the common interests of the suppressor community. To accomplish our mission, our principal initiatives focus on state lobbying, federal lobbying, public education, and industry outreach.

For more information on how you can join the ASA, and help protect and expand your right to own and use suppressors, please visit www.AmericanSuppressorAssociation.com.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christopher Eller

Why do 322 million people allow themselves to be controlled by 535 people who do not live under the same laws or lifestyle that the 322 million people do?

Start > Programs > Accessories > Calculator

322,000,000 citizens – 535 Congressors = 80,000 Lobbyists.

What was it Shakespeare said we do first?

And we say Russia is “corrupt?”

Jerry Dombeck

are you implying our system of government is corrupt?

Can you name a better system of government?

What? Can’t do it, can you.

And, 322,000,000 of us do not live the same lifestyle period. Ever hear of poor, middle class, and rich? None of those groups live the same.


Has anyone heard if the present system process time are getting shorter?

Wild Bill

“the American Suppressor Association (ASA) has met with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) on multiple occasions to discuss technical amendments to the language.” Why is anyone meeting with BATFE on the content of any proposed Congressional Act? Does Congress represent the BATFE or the American public? The BATFE has gotten too big for its britches.


The HPA and this act still seem to have little chance of passing. The GOP has the majority in the House, Senate, and we have a president that will be willing to sign them. It should be a slam dunk, but as in the last iteration of the HPA, they are dying on the vine.


While I welcome efforts to make these safety devices more readily available I’m frustrated by the parts of this bill that continue to “regulate” them as firearms. I have yet to see any evidence or valid argument that they pose a danger greater than scopes, slings, and other non-serialized shooting accessories. And with the inclusion of the Pittman-Robertson tax, we will now be required to pay, in lieu of the $200 NFA fee, a $50-$150 tax to save our hearing. What’s next, the same 10% fee on ear plugs and safety glasses? The swamp dwellers continue to work hard pass… Read more »


Ideally, both GCA ’68 and NFA ’34 would simply be repealed, and intellectually honest and persuasive Constitutional arguments can be made to support outright repeal. BUT – we’re dealing with Congress here, which has largely abandoned both the Constitution and honest intellectual discourse. So if we take an “all or nothing” approach . . . we’ll get nothing. An incremental approach – a step in the right direction, as the HPA clearly is – has a realistic chance of success. And it provides something to build on in the future.