U.S. Supreme Court Urged to Reverse 9th Circuit Gun Control Ruling

No Gun Cases Lawsuits Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court Urged to Reverse 9th Circuit Gun Control Ruling

WASHINGTON, D.C. -(Ammoland.com)- Today, plaintiffs in a long-running Second Amendment lawsuit challenging the State of California’s 10-day “waiting period laws” for firearm transfers have filed a brief at the United States Supreme Court urging the Justices to take up the case or issue a summary reversal of the 9th Circuit’s decision.

The case, captioned Jeff Silvester, et al. v. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, seeks to overturn a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision and clarify the standards that all lower courts should use when reviewing Second Amendment lawsuits.

Since the Supreme Court’s landmark McDonald v. Chicago decision, state and federal courts throughout the country have used wildly different approaches in scrutinizing laws that burden or eliminate the right to keep and bear arms.

The Plaintiffs and Petitioners’ reply brief, authored by Supreme Court and appellate attorney Erik. S. Jaffe of Washington, D.C., opens by pulling no punches: “After a waiver, a [call for response], and an extension of time, the [State’s] Brief in Opposition illustrates perfectly the contempt into which the Ninth Circuit has brought this Court’s precedents. A candid response would have confessed error and moved on. The response filed by the California Attorney General instead demonstrates a near complete lack of concern for precedent, procedure, or the risk of correction by this Court.”

The brief goes on to draw a comparison with the Hans Christian Anderson classic novel The Emperor’s New Clothes. “In the Ninth Circuit, the government no longer bears the burden of proof as a practical matter, speculation and conjecture now trump a trial court’s thorough and detailed findings of fact, and, we are told, the government deserves deference regarding legislative and social ‘facts’ even where there is no evidence that it reviewed or considered such supposed facts….We can either go along with the fiction of constitutional scrutiny – what lovely garments you have, oh west-coast emperors – or we can candidly acknowledge that the imperial Ninth Circuit has no constitutional clothes.”

“If the Supreme Court were to allow the Ninth Circuit to continue ignoring its precedents and abandoning longstanding principles of law, then a real crisis of confidence in the integrity of the courts may yet be on the horizon,” said Brandon Combs, an individual plaintiff in the case as well as the executive director of institutional plaintiff The Calguns Foundation. “We are cautiously optimistic that the Supreme Court will use this excellent case as a vehicle to re-establish order among the nation’s lower courts and remind them that the Second Amendment is not a second-class right.”

“On behalf of all of us at The Calguns Foundation, we want to thank our supporters for their generosity in seeing this case all way through this Supreme Court briefing, the amici who invested time and treasure in their own briefs, and especially lead plaintiff Jeff Silvester,” commented CGF Chairman Gene Hoffman. “Jeff has not only been a perfect plaintiff, he has showed the courage of millions of California gun owners unwilling to give up.”

The case is scheduled to be considered during the Court’s January 5 conference. A copy of the Silvester petition and briefing can be viewed or downloaded on their website.

Attorney Erik S. Jaffe is a 1990 graduate of the Columbia University School of Law and was a law clerk to Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1990 to 1991. Following that clerkship, he spent five years in litigation practice with the Washington, D.C. law firm of Williams & Connolly. In the summer of 1996 he left Williams & Connolly to clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. At the end of that clerkship he started his own practice, and has been a sole practitioner since 1997. Mr. Jaffe has been involved in over 100 Supreme Court matters, including filing 30 cert. petitions, representing half-a-dozen parties on the merits, and filing over 60 amicus briefs at both the cert. and merits stages.

 

Calguns FoundationAbout The Calguns Foundation:

The Calguns Founcation is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that serves its members, supporters, and the public through educational, cultural, and judicial efforts to advance Second Amendment and related civil rights.

For more information, visit their website.

Second Amendment Foundation

About Second Amendment Foundation:

Second Amendment Foundation is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

For more information, visit their website.

8
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
3 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
MalfordSamAdams1776RobertJames Higginbothamtomcat Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Robert
Guest
Robert

I have no proof, but I have heard that the pro-gun Justices may have put a hold on all gun cases until Trump could replace one of the anti-gun Justices with a pro-Constitutional Justices. In the 1990’s I worked as a Field Support Team Member of the NRA. at the Great Western Gun Show in Pomona Ca.During the first round of the Assault ban regulations in Cali. a VERY high ranking NRA official held a meeting (to which I was not supposed to attend)and I overheard him say that the NRA could not take this law to the Supreme Court… Read more »

tomcat
Guest
tomcat

Just today the 9th circus reversed the SCOTUS travel ban and said they find it to be illegal. What kind of crock is this and how does this this bunch if commies overrule the SCOTUS. It is past time to put a stop to them one way or another and make a parking garage out of their facilities.

James Higginbotham
Guest
James Higginbotham

look for them to be over ruled by the Supremes.
buy i AGREE, they all NEED REMOVED ANY WAY POSSIBLE.

SamAdams1776
Guest
SamAdams1776

We are under judicial and legislative tyranny. LEGAL METHODS will NOT grt your liberty back. YOU NOW MUDY start forming the equivalent of the Continental Congress, raise militias in all 50 states and take back by force of arms what has been usurped. Please keep in mind the words of out founders in the Declaration of Independence.

SamAdams1776
Guest
SamAdams1776

type-o MUST

SamAdams1776
Guest
SamAdams1776

Type-o MUST

Bill
Guest
Bill

Actually saying what the issues in the case are, would be a much more relevant article than talking so much about the 9th circuit, to me! What are the different standards for review? Where are they used?

Malford
Guest
Malford

Actually, considering the 9th circuit’s 79% reversal rate, the case warrants adding an additional dimension to it the will determine if they are either incompetent as they misinterpret law, or deliberately legislating from the bench, ignoring existing laws and precedents in favor of their own biases. Either way, they need their wrist slapped!!