Blind Man with a Gun

Blind Man with a Gun
Blind Man with a Gun

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- Do blind people have Second Amendment rights? Of course, they do. Should they be prevented from carrying guns for self-defense? No, they should be subject to the same laws as other people.

Carey McWilliams has demonstrated, through word and deed, that blind people are fully capable of responsible self-defense and responsible use of guns. It is a disability, not a death sentence. From postbullitin.com:

The blind guy with a gun permit became a minor celebrity who made national and international news in 2001, even getting a segment on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show” that showed him firing an assault rifle into the ground in front of a target.

“At first it was like, it was either a comedy thing or a villain thing,” recalled McWilliams, who insists he shrugs off detractors or jokes because he feels an obligation to educate other blind people about gun rights and gun safety.

In 2007, McWilliams self-published an autobiography about his hunting exploits and his efforts get a gun permit.

McWilliams' autobiography was published in 2007 but is currently out of print.  Carey maintains a web page that tells his story.

He makes many valid points about the viability of a blind person's ability to use a gun for self-defense.

All of us have different abilities and capabilities. A blind person cannot see, but they often have superb hearing and know how to operate with little or no vision. Most self-defense situations occur in low or limited lighting.

Carey McWilliams made the decision to only fire his gun in self-defense when he is in contact with his attacker.

The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) should protect McWilliams rights under the Second Amendment. I looked at the ADA website. From ada.gov:

§ 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination

(a) No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any public entity.

As a counter, the ADA does not ensure that blind people are issued drivers licenses. Drivers licenses are considered a privilege, not a Constitutional right. There is a portion of the ADA about whether a disability can make a person dangerous.  From ada.gov:

§ 35.139 Direct threat.

(a) This part does not require a public entity to permit an individual to participate in or benefit from the services, programs, or activities of that public entity when that individual poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others.

(b) In determining whether an individual poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others, a public entity must make an individualized assessment, based on reasonable judgment that relies on current medical knowledge or on the best available objective evidence, to ascertain: the nature, duration, and severity of the risk; the probability that the potential injury will actually occur; and whether reasonable modifications of policies, practices, or procedures or the provision of auxiliary aids or services will mitigate the risk.

Such an assessment does not seem difficult. Legally blind people have defended themselves with firearms in their homes. We know it is possible for them to do so in public. The burden is on a public entity to show, in each individual case, that there’s a direct threat that cannot be overcome with a reasonable accommodation.

Carey McWilliams has concealed carry permits from Arizona, Florida, North Dakota, and Virginia. He was denied a permit in Minnesota, on the basis that he was a danger to himself and others, even though the judge said he was sure McWilliams would be very conscientious. The judge ruled the ADA did not apply to gun permits.

McWilliams says he plans to apply again, and if refused, to challenge the discrimination in federal court.

While McWilliams is completely blind, there are many other people who are legally blind but have some vision. They should not be discriminated against either.

There are 13 states that do not require a permit in order to carry a firearm, concealed or openly. Those states have a significant number of blind people. I have yet to see a headline where a blind person used a firearm irresponsibly and killed or injured someone while they were defending themselves.

Overcoming disabilities is inspirational. We have chosen to spend enormous amounts to accommodate people in wheelchairs.

The rights of people who are blind should not be violated, because of prejudice and unwarranted fear.

©2018 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch


About Dean Weingarten:Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

14
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
7 Comment threads
7 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
RODNEY V ZEIGLERNigel CairnsWild BillBlue BaronDale Barclay Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
RODNEY V ZEIGLER
Guest
RODNEY V ZEIGLER

My wife who is legally blind cannot get a concealed carry permit in Nebraska, but the minute she crosses the state line into Kansas she can. Yes, there are huge differences between the abilities of the blind and sighted, there are no differences whatsoever in their need to defend themselves should the situation arise. If anything a person with limited or no sight would seem to be a more tempting target for those inclined to do ill.

Nigel Cairns
Guest
Nigel Cairns

you are mad

Blue Baron
Guest
Blue Baron

I have known legally blind people who are able to safely ride bicycles, etc. A disability should not automatically disqualify a person from any activity.

Nigel Cairns
Guest
Nigel Cairns

I have always thought that aiming a gun was a waste of time-just make sure the gun is big enough to kill everything around you.

Wild Bill
Guest
Wild Bill

@NC, It would not be much time. Using the sights produces better shot placement, so that you can carry a smaller caliber lighter firearm. “Carry a lot, shoot a little.” comes to mind.

Nigel Cairns
Guest
Nigel Cairns

my reply was sarcastic-but you don’t have the wit to understand that. And you have a gun? Lordy!

Dale Barclay
Guest
Dale Barclay

Blind people are allowed to hunt in Wisconsin. Another person has to aim the weapon for them but the blind person must pull the trigger by himself.

Nigel Cairns
Guest
Nigel Cairns

is that so the blind person gets the satisfaction of killing?

Brick
Guest
Brick

Looks like that blind dude is firing that weapon in his house.
Sorry, no dice. A round that misses its target can go thru walls and into someone’s house next lot over. Those rounds he shot are peppered all over the target. The CC course requires a grouping a blind individual can’t keep consistent anyway.

YaDaddy
Guest
YaDaddy

So that target paper I have in my man cave, from a recent range trip, means I was shooting in my house?

I wasn’t aware of that. Thanks for clearing that up.

Greg Newman
Guest
Greg Newman

Looks to me like he has a target hung up from where he went shooting at a range, that shows he has pretty good grouping & he is posing with it.

tomcat
Guest
tomcat

Maybe obama broke this law when he took guns away from Veterans. Oh I forgot, there is no law a democrat can’t change at will if it benefits them.

Hats off to this young man who has the determination to remain an individual and survive on his own.

Nigel Cairns
Guest
Nigel Cairns

you are mad

Nigel Cairns
Guest
Nigel Cairns

stupid!