Assault On 2nd Amendment Can Only Bring Destruction To Our Nation As A Free Republic

Opinion

Democrat's War on Guns
The Democratic Party Leadership & the Radical Left deem it perfectly acceptable to utilize the lowest common denominator in society to destroy the fundamental right of the people to keep and bear arms.

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- Americans May Forestall All Attacks On Their Freedom But For One: Loss Of Their Right To Keep And Bear Arms.

There is ample evidence of sinister work afoot to tear down the fabric of this Nation that the founders of our Republic fought so hard to create and preserve. The creation of both the Federal Reserve System and the IRS that have sucked the lifeblood of Americans’ toil are two clear instances of attempts by rapacious forces from both within the U.S. and outside the U.S. to undermine the integrity of the U.S. as an independent and sovereign Nation State; to weaken our Nation’s institutions; and to enfeeble our Nation’s citizenry so that it might be more easily disciplined and controlled.

Understand there is nothing in the Constitution that either requires or mandates the creation of an independent privately owned Federal Reserve System or that requires or mandates the creation of a governmental structure, the IRS, within the U.S. They are both artificial constructs. The framers of our Constitution did not place them in that sacred Document. Yet, they exist, and both have done much to harm both this Nation and this Nation’s citizenry, up to the present moment in time. Just as insidiously, we have seen, for decades, attempts to destroy the independence and sovereignty of our Nation by thrusting the U.S. into economic unions with other Nations. These economic pacts and treaties serve as a diabolical backdoor through which the internationalist Rothschild clan and its minions dare insinuate themselves into the political, social, cultural, and legal fabric of our Nation, quite apart from the economic fabric, benefitting multinational cartels to the detriment of our Nation’s workers and small business owners.

But The Most Diabolical Assault On Our Nation And On A Free People Is This: Destruction Of The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms.

More recently, within the last few years especially—and never far from the Collectivists’ desire to eradicate our free Republic—we see the destroyers of our Nation attempting, now and again, to undermine, indeed erase, the right of the people to keep and bear arms. With the U.S. Presidential election drawing ever nearer, we are seeing renewed attacks on the Second Amendment. In fits and starts, the Democratic Party—now a refuge for Radical Leftists of all stripes: Marxists, Socialists, Communists, and Anarchists—inevitably and invariably returns to its signature platform and policy goal: the weakening and eventual eradication of the Second Amendment. But why is that? Why would the Democratic Party Leadership and its Radical Left contingent want this? For this reason: An armed citizenry is absolutely anathema to their aim for a massive increase in the size of Government, and, concomitantly, for a powerful centralized Government exercising control over the Nation’s citizenry’s every thought and action. And so, understandably, albeit, unconscionably, we see the American citizenry’s exercise of its Second Amendment fundamental right of the people to keep and bear arms under insistent, incessant, omni-present, strenuous attack.

But, what is the rationale for the incessant, virulent attack on the Second Amendment? Is it really predicated on a desire, ever expressed, to curb “gun violence” as the Public is told? No! That is mere pretext. Were it otherwise, then those who truly claim a desire to curb violence with guns, would direct their attention to those elements in society—namely gang members, common criminals, and terrorists—who misuse firearms. But, they don’t direct their attention to these elements of society. Instead, they direct their attention to the firearm itself, and on the tens of millions of average Americans: rational, law-abiding citizens who wish only to exercise their fundamental right to keep and bear arms, uninhibited and unrestrained and unconstrained by Government.

Consider the media’s incendiary attacks on guns and gun ownership whenever a lunatic goes off half-cocked: most recently, as we see in newspaper accounts of two recent mass shooting incidents. The New York Times proclaims on a banner headline, on August 5, 2019, in its digital format paper that: “Shootings Renew Debate Over How to Combat Domestic Terrorism.” And in the Newspaper’s home edition, the banner headline reads: “One Shooting Massacre Follows Another, Shaking a Bewildered Nation to its Core.” In the fourth paragraph of the article, the Times reports, “Democrats urged Congress to take action and pass stricter gun laws.”

In other words, the Democratic Party Leadership and the Radical Left deem it perfectly acceptable to utilize the lowest common denominator in society to destroy the fundamental right of the people to keep and bear arms. But, even on that score, the antigun zealots in the Press cannot claim even a modicum of consistency. Where was The New York Times’ outrage when the lunatic and Antifa fanatic, Willem Van Spronsen, attacked an immigration detention facility in Tacoma, Washington, on July 13, 2019, with an aim toward murdering federal police officers and destroying the facility. That outrage was nowhere to be seen. The Times reported dryly, matter-of-factly, indeed deceptively, that:

“the man [Willem Van Spronsen], who was armed with a rifle, was throwing unspecified ‘incendiary devices' at the Northwest Detention Center, according to a police statement. . . . Police have not established a motive for the attack, but The Seattle Times reported that a longtime friend of Mr. Van Spronsen’s, Deb Bartley, believed he had intended to provoke a fatal conflict.”

No motive for the attack on ICE Officials and on the Northwest Detention Center that can be deduced? Really? New York Times reporters couldn't undertake an investigation? Conducting independent investigations–isn't that what Newspaper Reporters do; what it is they are supposed to do, expected to do, to get to the bottom of a story? And, couldn't the story's news reporters hazard an educated guess, at the very least, as to a possible motive, given that Spronsen did, after all, leave a “manifesto” which he obviously intended for the public to read?

The conservative Washington Times, having investigated the would-be killer, Spronsen, unlike the Left-wing New York Times–that, it seems, decided to forego investigating the motives of Spronsen–found no difficulty at all in ascribing a motive to Willem Spronsen's actions, as the Washington Times found reason aplenty for so informing the public of its findings, writing:

Willem Van Spronsen, 69, declares early on in his manifesto that ‘evil says concentration camps for folks deemed lesser are necessary. the handmaid of evil says the concentration camps should be more humane,’ using a term usually reserved for Nazi Germany’s death camps, but introduced in the border-security debate last month by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York.

He also mocked people criticizing Ms. Ocasio-Cortez for intellectual sloppiness, referring to ‘these days of highly profitable detention/concentration camps and a battle over the semantics.’

Van Spronsen, armed with an AR-15 assault weapon that his manifesto encouraged others to acquire to bring about a revolution, attacked the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma around 4 a.m. Saturday. He threw ‘incendiary devices’ and set vehicles before officers shot him to death as he was trying to ignite a propane tank. In his manifesto, he called the detention facility ‘an abomination’ and that he was ‘not standing by’ as it operated.

‘i really shouldn’t have to say any more than this. i set aside my broken heart and i heal the only way i know how- by being useful. i efficiently compartmentalize my pain. . . and i joyfully go about this work,’ he wrote.

He indicated that he intended the attack as a suicide mission, writing that ‘i regret that i will miss the rest of the revolution. thank you for the honor of having me in your midst. giving me space to be useful.’

Antifa activists declared him useful, too.

Seattle Antifascist Action called him ‘our good friend and comrade Willem Van Spronsen’ and said he ‘became a martyr who gave his life to the struggle against fascism.’

The group went on to call for more such attacks in memory of Van Spronsen.

Apparently The New York Times missed these little details about Spronsen that the Washington Times felt pertinent enough to inform the public about. Or, perhaps New York Times Editors, unlike the Washington Times Editors, felt that Spronsen’s motives, clearly amounting to domestic terrorism were either inscrutable or irrelevant; therefore falling outside the parameters of what the Times concludes is “All the News That’s Fit to Print.” One is left to suspect that there is, in fact, contrary to adherence to its motto, much “News That IS Fit to print,” but that The New York Times would rather leave the public in the dark in those instances where the news doesn't fit the paper's personal ends: one directed to indoctrinating the public to accept a certain line of thought, rather than merely and essentially informing the public, so that the public might draw its own conclusion.

And there you have it!


Arbalest Quarrel

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel' website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

  • 15
    Leave a Reply

    Please Login to comment
    10 Comment threads
    5 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    12 Comment authors
    USAtomcatBAM PowTerTer46noseyparker Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    BAM Pow
    Member
    BAM Pow

    Both sides of the isle are the problem, the system is not broken it’s designed this way. Fear are the shackles of modern mental slavery to this bipartisan madness. No one blames a knife when many get stabbed to death, no one blames the car when a crowd is run down, I don’t see Drs getting arrested for killing many times more than guns with the prescription pad…where is the logic to blame guns? Don’t blame your fellow citizens no matter what political programming they choose, they aren’t the problem, this attack comes from the top!

    TerTer46
    Member
    TerTer46

    The DEMS are pushing hard along with thier PRESS CORPS (MSM), have a bill written (A HORRIBLE BILL) and pushing hard for the Senate to move it forward. If you want to keep your rights, get informed, read everything you cna on Gun Bills in the House and Senate, write to your Congressional Representatives and Join Gun Right Groups. Don’t throw acusations out at anyone, talk logic not emotion and by all means keep up to date on what is going on in your own state and communites.

    Become involved so you are not left behind and empty handed.

    Wild Bill
    Member
    Wild Bill

    @Roger Katz, You have a lot of credibility, so how is it that “The creation of … the Federal Reserve System … sucked the lifeblood of Americans …” ?
    And what is this about “…internationalist Rothschild clan and its minions …”?

    MICHAEL J
    Member
    MICHAEL J

    The Constitution is a work of genius. But the one flaw that exists that the framers never considered: Self-serving lifetime career politicians. When representatives care more about staying in office than their constituents, they will sell their souls to remain there. We need term limits so special interest groups cannot influence politicians to do their bidding. Career politicians complain that they can’t get anything done but most have been in office longer than most presidents and somehow it’s never their problem. Term limits are the only answer, then maybe these magnanimous public servants will get off their ass, read, understand… Read more »

    Wild Bill
    Member
    Wild Bill

    The framers did not foresee the depth and breath of corruption of politicians, judges, and bureaucrats, either. Let’s collar those positions with term limits, too! Lobbyists (professional bribers) need to be dealt with, as well. What do we do with them?

    JPM
    Member
    JPM

    We have open and concealed carry (Constitutional Carry) here in Arizona for any and all citizens the only requirement is that you ARE a citizen of Arizona. I see people daily in shops, stores, gas stations, and yes, even Walmart, carrying openly. I open carry and carry concealed. The only people who complain are liberals from other states visiting here and liberal left wing loser residents (very few). USA, I guess those of us here and in Colorado will soon be, if not already, deemed “Domestic Terrorists” by the left, Democrats and no doubt soon, the Federal Government.

    noseyparker
    Member
    noseyparker

    You do not need to be a citizen of Arizona to carry a firearm, open or concealed.

    USA
    Member
    USA

    They declared us enemy of our own country over a hundred years ago. Nothing has changed. Anybody demanding freedom over tyranny is considered a terrorist, enemy of the authoritarian state of communism formerly known as America. Freedom is a radical concept in an authoritarian state.

    Jonesy
    Member
    Jonesy

    Here in New Hampshire, Gov. Chris Sununu just Vetoed Three {3} radical Democrat Gun Control Bills.

    Stripeseven
    Member
    Stripeseven

    Political Criminals could care less about Constitutional rights. They have written off one of the greatest documents ever created. These Oath breaking elected servants are only concerned with one thing. To undermine our Constitutional form of government so they can Implement a Regime of Unchecked, Unlimited Power in their pursuit to destroy America, and our way of life as we know it.The Commies are comin’… No other conclusion exists…

    Will Flatt
    Member

    TRUTH!! …However, publishing such truths has just recently been declared to be “domestic terrorism” by the FBI (Federal Baby Incinerators)!

    The assault on ALL our liberties is approaching a crescendo, and this is going to inevitably go to guns!!

    Get ready, fellow patriots. Quietly form up your independent units. Train. Develop/improve your commo, and your unit tactics. Leaders, learn 4GW strategy RFN!! Time is short!!

    tetejaun
    Member
    tetejaun

    All ‘gun control laws’ are un-Constitutional: Article 6, U.S. Constitution “The Constitution…shall be the supreme law of the land”. Therefore, no federal or state legislative law, Executive Order or local decree may limit, deny, change or modify the Constitution. THAT is called the ‘Supremacy Clause’. Article 6 continues “All laws must conform to and be made pursuant to the Constitution”. Therefore, any federal or state legislative law, Executive Order or local decree not in 100% harmony with the U.S. Constitution, is null & void, regardless what some anti-American communist democrat ‘judge’ says. When Americans obey the un-Constitutional ‘gun control laws’,… Read more »

    USA
    Member
    USA

    If your state doesn’t allow you to be armed then perhaps it’s time to move to Colorado where you can open carry with no problems. Open carry is commonly seen here especially outside of Denver. Can openly carry pistols and long guns no problem and can shop while armed anywhere that Ive ever shopped and people don’t freak out. It’s common to see people shopping at the supermarket armed. Just the other day at the store a woman in her early 20’s with 1 child shopping while carrying a 9MM and a week or so ago when I was pulling… Read more »

    tomcat
    Member
    tomcat

    Hm, Colorado, that is where lickinhooper or hichinlooper is from. Due to his great support of taking guns away manufacturers moved out of Colorado. I find it hard to believe there is so much progun activity in a state that has been flooded by commiefornians that fled the high priced state.

    USA
    Member
    USA

    Hick is not popular here and neither is Polis. Hick and Polis support against guns has not amended the Constitution and therein lays the rub. Socialists here put lot’s of White Americans out of work not only in the gun industry. I stated facts in my post regardless of how hard it is to believe. You will see how pro gun it is here when the war breaks out. Based upon the massive gun fire coming from all directions for miles when folks were getting ready I think it’s going to be a slaughter. Looking at how everybody is entirely… Read more »