The Evil Intent Behind Democrats’ New Anti-Gun Bill: HR 127

Dan Wos, Author of – Good Gun Bad Guy

USA – -( HR 127 is an anti-gun bill that was introduced to the house committee and sponsored by Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee.

The bill has many concerning things in it but most importantly is the intent behind the bill. The bill includes age requirements, storage requirements, and a national firearms and ammunition database through the ATF. The database would be accessible by every person in the United States. The bill states:

“The Attorney General shall make the contents of the database accessible to all members of the public, all Federal, State, and local law enforcement authorities, all branches of the United States Armed Forces, and all State and local governments, as defined by the Bureau.”

Why would Democrats want your neighbors, co-workers, and social media contacts to know where your guns are located? Anti-gunners have always liked the idea of turning in their fellow gun-owning citizens. We saw this early on with SWATting. SWATing was a strategy used to turn in gun-owners on false claims of serious gun-related incidents, often resulting in the death of innocent, unsuspecting people. SWATting evolved into the red flag law, where states encouraged people to anonymously turn in fellow citizens who owned guns under nothing more than an accusation that they could be a danger to themselves or society. The red flag law is a violation of due process rights because guns can be confiscated without a hearing. Now, Democrats in Congress want to make it even easier by letting the angry, irrational, anti-gun crowd know exactly who owns guns and the home addresses where they can be located.

The bill also includes another attempt at banning commonly owned semi-automatic rifles, magazine capacity restrictions and the requirement of a psychological evaluation of the gun-owner and “other members of the household” before the government will allow you to exercise your God-given right. Along with the mandatory psychological evaluation, at least two or more family members or associates including spouses and “former spouses” would be interviewed on behalf of the gun owner.

HR 127 also requires an $800 licensing fee and a mandatory insurance policy to be held by the gun owner. Aside from the high costs involved, some insurance companies can’t even offer firearms insurance in some states, due to current state laws that are in place. New York being one of them. So what happens if insurance companies can’t offer insurance in your State? What then? How many market options for this type of insurance do you think you’d have? What would happen if your firearm insurance policy lapsed? Would the insurance company be required to notify the government like they do if your car insurance lapses? If so, then what?

The fines and penalties for violating some of these restrictions would be anywhere between fifty to a hundred thousand dollars and ten to twenty years in prison or both.

So why are Democrats so intent on violating the rights of their fellow citizens? Could it be, they understand their policies and ideology go against the will of the vast majority of Americans? Do Democrats understand that real Americans don’t want socialism in their country? Are Democrats afraid that they’re about to get a major political push back? Are they concerned that if they don’t gain legislative leverage over American citizens now, they may get voted out of office forever?

Democrats made a big mistake when they allowed radical AOC and the like to publicly voice their intentions of implementing socialism in America. They had been working very hard, up to that point, to keep it quiet while trying to eliminate the Second Amendment under the guise of public safety. They know the vast majority of Americans do not want the policies they’re pushing, but by the time Democrats publicly embraced the radical, Marxist ideology, they realized that they had made one big mistake. They were supposed to get the guns first. Now they’re up against a wall. They’ve made their intentions known. They’ve already started pushing socialism in a free country and on people who want nothing to do with it but unlike other countries, American citizens still own guns. More guns than people. At this point, they are desperate to pass gun-restrictions because they’re scared to death of an American uprising.

Stand strong America, there is an evil in our government, the likes of which we’ve never seen before. the 2nd Amendment is not a privilege. It’s your right. Never give it up because it’s the only thing that ensures our freedom and Democrats hate that.

About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on the Sean Hannity Show, NRATV, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun-owners.

Dan Wos

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
uncle dudley

Maybe this bill HR127 is the real reason Pelosi wants to keep the national guard surrounding the congressional compound, they know if this bill should become law all hell will break out.
I am surprised they didn’t include in the language that firearm owners have to post signs outside their homes warning others of the presence of guns and ammo on site.
What a bunch of morons in charge.


You sir might be on to something there, I have thought the same. What exactly are they scared of 500,000 legally armed citizens marching in D.C.? That is a trip I would certainly make. The National Guard ain’t going to help at that point.
Better call BLM and Anustifa for back up. Wouldn’t that be a glorious weekend?

Last edited 1 year ago by SEMPAI

would all have to drive no airline would fly you ,and as for charlie the police are not on our side ended in the 70s they now do whatever shi.. told to do west palm beach threatened a citizen over twitter comment on controlling commentary on council meetings shut down descent by turning off feed


In the words of General George Washington, “Bring it, Bitches!”


You nailed it Dan, “The 2nd amendment is not a privilege.”, therefore the default position of the courts should be any and all legislative actions to infringe are violations of rights. You could also have added that even registration and tracking are fundamentally violations of the 4th amendment right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,…and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. Registration is fundamentally a violation of the 2nd and 4th amendment. The courts are the key.


The “law” should it pass is illegal because the government is now illegal. It seems to me the best course of action is to step back and let them pass it. The very act of opposing it before it passes would seem to imply that the process is legitimate, when it is definitely not. If they try to impose it on us then we are entitled to deal with it as we must. That will be to reimpose the constitution on a criminal government.

Charlie Foxtrot

A quite idiotic approach to let the other side do whatever they want and just declare it illegal in our minds. Law enforcement and the courts don’t care about what you think about a certain law that was enacted because you refused to voice your opposition against it. Your heroic phantasies won’t help you when you get charged and convicted.


TINVOWOOT, idiot. The Republic is dead and you want to stay in the boiling pot. Enjoy.

Charlie Foxtrot

At least, no one is ever going to ask me again who I am going to vote for, right? LOL The pro-business Democrat from New York certainly did a number on you and others, ensuring that Democrats will rule this country for decades. Not participating in the process and living in civil war phantasies is not getting you anywhere, other than eventually jailed or killed! Good luck with the loony approach of blatant ignorance! The irony is that you do benefit from those that actually do oppose any gun control legislation and call their Representatives and Senators when it is… Read more »


I called you an idiot, straight up. You are the one living in phantasies (SIC unless you are a shrink). Is there anything in your life worth dying for? You are not my countryman.

Charlie Foxtrot

You may want to read up on the Ammoland comment policies regarding personal attacks! This is your idiotic plan:


Actually you are correct, I should not have used a subjective analysis to label you an idiot. You are actually a useful idiot, which is a much more objective label.

Charlie Foxtrot

Well, when someone runs out of arguments, they resort to personal attacks. Nothing new in the Ammoland section!

Charlie Foxtrot

I am certainly not QAnon! I also don’t have multiple accounts on Ammoland!

Charlie Foxtrot

I just don’t follow any cult and do not have the need to deceive Ammoland commenters.

Last edited 1 year ago by Charlie Foxtrot
Charlie Foxtrot

LOL. Thank you for confirming!


You are the biggest edjit I’ve ever heard. The elect was for Trump till the demorats rigged the election with the help of some rino’s. You know good and well I’m right but you want admit it.

Charlie Foxtrot

I guess reading comprehension isn’t your strength, neither is the use of the English language. Personal attacks don’t validate your non-existing argument either.

Dave in Fairfax

There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This


That actually googles up as a word now. I was quite surprised.


“They” control the House, the Senate and the Whitehouse… Along with their greedy fingers on the U.S. Treasury, the HOT Button and everything else between there and the short and curly on your nads!


“Law enforcement and the courts don’t care about what you think about a certain law that was enacted because you refused to voice your opposition against it”
What Charlie leaves out is that Law enforcement and the courts don’t care what you voice your opposition against either. Whether their opposition is silent or noisy, they still do whatever unlawful things their Master orders them to.
I wonder why he tries so hard to gloss over this simple fact of life, and sweep it under the rug instead? Perhaps he isn’t what he pretends to be?

Charlie Foxtrot

The usual, a straw man again! “Law enforcement and the courts don’t care about what you think about a certain law that was enacted because you refused to voice your opposition against it” Voicing opposition may stop enactment! He literally wants H.R. 127 to be enacted, so he can LARP in his phantasy world. Nice try, troll! I said that “law enforcement and the courts don’t care about what you think about a certain law”. I never said they care if one opposes it, as you imply. Let me guess, now follows your usual trolling pattern of nonsensical back and… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Charlie Foxtrot

Nope. As you well know, I don’t feed you trolls. I write for others to read. Not you.


Not all LEOs support Biden’s regime….especially not the ones in the South.

Charlie Foxtrot

Until they have to decide between keeping their job/pension and violating your rights by enforcing a law! Wake up! For example, the state of Tennessee is one of the worst when it comes to civil asset forfeiture. Also, big cities in the South are not much different from big cities in the North or Left Coast.


LEOs did not stand in the way of the feds in 1993.

LEOs participated in gun confiscation in 2005.

Not to make this a North/South thing (that is a ridiculous divide to allow “them” to exploit), but since you brought it up – both of those events were in the South.


Mr. Thomas Jefferson stated: ” the beauty of the Second Amendment is that it’s not really needed, until THEY try to take it away!” It is time America!


We have to stop squabbling among ourselves. Nullify all the Marxist acts at the state border. It’s legal whether they like it or not. The 10th Amendment was created precisely for when the central government becomes tyrannical. Read Thomas Woods: “Nullification: How to resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century.”


Didn’t 9/11 make it clear to everyone the government can’t protect us or itself?


“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the… Read more »


Evil you say? I have seen Pure Evil once in my 68 years, and trust me you will know it if you see it. Over those years I have seen all kinds of gun control that was actually put in place, and later it was removed. I figure our FFL is our here to stay form of gun control, and I say it works so leave it alone. Over my years I learned why some firearms have been declared not legal for me to own. IE, Sawed-Off Shotguns, same for sawed-off rifles, just to name a few. Now if I… Read more »


No nation on earth is more deserving of Total Enslavement than Idiot Americans! If they are to lose any right at all it should be the right to vote. They have proven over and over and over again that they’re too God Damn stupid to have that much power.

Charlie Foxtrot

H.R. 127 isn’t new. The same bill was introduced under the same name (with different number, H.R. 4081) in the last Congress. It died in the Democrat-controlled House committee. H.R. 127 isn’t going anywhere in this Congress either, despite all the fear mongering by both sides. It’s a grand standing bill. That’s all. Meanwhile, H.R. 8 did pass in the last House. A version of that may be easily attached to the omnibus bill. We need to stay focused and have practical arguments beyond “mUh rIgHtS”. Once gun control legislation goes forward, we need to be ready call our Representatives… Read more »


Yeah, and Trump WON!

Ryben Flynn

Actually and technically Trump did win except for the overwhelming evidence the Democrats cheated in the six States where the margin of victory for Trump was close enough to flip it to Biden.
Too bad the Courts sided with the Left on those.