Rittenhouse Case: Proposed Dominick Black Plea Deal, Felony Charges Dropped

Dominick Black at Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)-– The Kenosha County Eye has obtained a proposed Plea agreement for Dominick Black related to the Kyle Rittenhouse case. Dominick Black was Kyle Rittenhouse’s friend who purchased the rifle Kyle carried and shot three attackers in self-defense, in 2020, during the riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

The rifle was purchased legally under  Federal law because the rifle was never “substantially transferred” to Kyle Rittenhouse. It was kept in a locked safe in Wisconsin until the riots in Kenosha. It was not a “dangerous weapon” illegally provided to a person under the age of 18, in Wisconsin law, because it is a rifle with a regular length barrel, and Kyle Rittenhouse was not forbidden from possessing a rifle with a regular length barrel.

The charges against Dominick Black for “providing” the rifle fell apart when the weapons charge against Kyle Rittenhouse was dismissed.

A status conference is scheduled for 10 January at 11:30 a.m. with the parties and Judge Bruce Schroeder. The status conference was originally scheduled for November 22, 2021, shortly after the Rittenhouse verdict.  It is expected the proposed plea agreement will be discussed and considered by Judge Schroeder. Judge Schroeder presided over the Kyle Rittenhouse case, where Dominick Black gave testimony. Kevin Matheson of the Kenosha County Eye and others discuss the proposed plea agreement on youtube.

At about minute 37 Kevin Matheson of Kenosha County Eye says the prosecutor Binger and Dominick Black’s attorney have signed a plea agreement to drop the felony charges and plead guilty to a county ordinance of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. This is a citation, not a criminal matter. The fine agreed to is $2,000. There is no mention of forfeiture of the rifles which are legally owned by Dominick Black.  Here is the entire proposed plea agreement obtained by the Kenosha County Eye.

You can see the court records showing a hearing on the plea agreement for January 10, 2022, at Branch 3, Courtroom 209 in Kenosha.

Kevin Matheson, from the Kenosha County Eye, who has been following this case closely from the start, believes Judge Schroeder will almost certainly sign the plea agreement.

Plea agreements are merely suggestions to the judge. He does not have to agree with them. It is possible Judge Schroeder will not agree and do something different.

Judge Schroeder could refuse to accept the plea agreement and dismiss the county ordinance charge with prejudice, so it could not be re-filed. He could reduce the fine from $2000 to $1 or nothing. Assistant District Attorney Binger did little to endear himself to Judge Schroeder during the Rittenhouse trial.

There isn’t anything in the plea agreement on the release of Dominick Black’s rifles which were impounded as evidence in the case. Both rifles are legally owned by Dominick Black. They were both legally purchased by him. Kyle Rittenhouse has said he wishes the rifle which was purchased on the agreement it be transferred to him after he attained the age of 18, to be destroyed.

Sgt. Viola Black of the Kenosha Police Department has said if Mr. Black is acquitted of the charges, the rifles will be returned. From kenoshanews.com:

“If Mr. Black is acquitted of the charges,” Viola said, “his firearm would be returned to him. If he is found guilty, the firearm would remain in evidence.”

Judge Schroeder could stipulate the rifles be returned to Dominick Black along with the bond money. If the rifles were sold or raffled, the proceeds might be enough to cover the legal expenses of Dominick Black.

The rifle used by Kyle Rittenhouse is estimated by collectors to have an estimated value of over half a million dollars.

George Zimmerman’s pistol, which he used in self-defense against Trayvon Martin, sold for $250,000. The rifle carried by Dominick Black could easily fetch twenty thousand dollars. The set of the two rifles might bring a million dollars at auction, for the collectible and historical value.

At an auction, it is possible Michael Bloomberg or some other Leftist Billionaire might bid on the rifle in order to destroy it. In such a case, the rifle might be bid into the millions of dollars.

Another option would be a national raffle for the rifle. Kyle Rittenhouse raised well over two million dollars for his defense.  If the two rifles were raffled off nationally, it is not unreasonable the raffle might raise another two million dollars, with the understanding the proceeds would offset the legal expenses involved.

Opinion:

It appears Assistant District Attorney Binger is attempting to salvage a fig leaf for his disastrous efforts in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. $2,000 is far less than additional legal fees which would almost certainly accrue if Dominick Black did not accept the plea deal offered by Binger.


About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Dean Weingarten

4.2 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mikial

There should have never been any charges to either of them in the first place. The DA is a putz and should just cut his losses and drop the whole thing.

Laddyboy

Hopefully, the Judge will DISMISS the case WITH PREJUDICE!!

RJL

The internal Anti-Constitutional enemies of the United States must be crushed…

Deplorable Bill

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” Why do we keep loosing ground when it is “they” who are obviously, legally, constitutionally, morally, ethically wrong? This young man, Mr Black, did nothing wrong, to the contrary, his actions enabled lives to be saved at those riots. Same thing with property damage, looting and vandalism. The cops were ordered to stand down. What other choices are available to the public? Let your town burn down? I am all for doing things legally as long as it’s BIBLICALLY and constitutionally correct. I have no problem… Read more »

Green Mtn. Boy

Bill
Exactly,as any & all gun control is un Constitutional,the judge should dismiss all charges,he may want to charge the prosecutor with malicious prosecution.

Last edited 16 days ago by Green Mtn. Boy
Wild Bill

True that the judge might want to charge the prosecutor, but that is not within his power. The judge can cite for contempt of court, but we are getting a little ahead of ourselves.

CourageousLion

Maybe a grand jury would indict the persecutor.

swmft

someone needs to arrest da and try him under title 18 242

Wild Bill

Yes, the federal grand jury that CourageousL suggests could do that.

Tionico

we KNOW Binger has not filed agaisnt the creep who admitted to aiming his handgun at Kuyl’es head, which act resulted in his gun arm being vapourised. A fitting result for his attempted murder. He was at the time of that action a convicted felon in unlawful possession of a firearm. Perhaps Binger, instead of going after those who helped quell the riots at law might consider DOING HIS JOB and charging the attacker whocommitted felony acts that night. He’s got an agenda. Hope his Soros money feels good in his pocket. He never should have brought chrges agaisnt ths… Read more »

CourageousLion

PREACH IT!

he-is-right.png
uncle dudley

Black shouldn’t agree to anything except all charges dismissed against him.
His buddy was found not guilty therefore no crime was committed.

Wild Bill

Yes, hang tough.

Russn8r

He should get a reward, not fine, for breaking that “law”.

Duane

In the big picture a civil forfeiture offense is not that different then a traffic citation.

To keep on fighting could very well mean a lot of extra cost that would add up to more the 2000 dollars very quickly.

Finnky

Binger’s office has spent considerably more than $2k pursuing charges against Mr. Black. Of course all their charges were specious – including “contributing to delinquency of a minor.” I’d like to hear Binger’s theory on how anything Mr Black did contributed to anyone’s delinquency. Only misbehavior I’ve seen in this case was Kyle ignoring curfew, as everyone else was doing and Kyle driving without a license – as he admitted in open court during his murder trial. As strict “law & order” ADA, how can Binger justify ignoring such egregious criminal conduct as driving without a license? I’d like nothing… Read more »

Last edited 17 days ago by Finnky
CourageousLion

Naaaa, Binger needs to be visited from AFAR. When that starts happening these psychpathic control freaks will begin to FEAR the people and things will become normal again for a few years.

Wild Bill

Binger was Soros funded. Track the money and track the Soros operatives.

incorrigible

You are exactly Right! I have “Been there, done that”, on an auto accident. With the help of a friendly lawyer who gave me a cheap rate, the whole thing cost me about $2,500. And that was about 8 years ago! To fight the original charges would have cost 4 or 5 times that. The only ones who seemed to understand why I was charged at all were the judge and the state’s attorney. Even the police and probation department people didn’t understand it!