New York Democrats Declare They Will Defy SCOTUS’ Gun Decision ~ VIDEO

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- The Supreme Court of the United States handed down a decision written by Judge Clarence Thomas which ruled in a 6-3 vote that New Yorkers do have the right to carry a gun in public without showing “proper cause.”

“We conclude that respondents have failed to meet their burden to identify an American tradition justifying New York’s proper cause requirement.”

The New York gun permitting process has put New Yorkers in a vulnerable position by making their 2nd Amendment right subject to the whims of Judges and Sheriff Departments. New York’s two-tier pistol permitting process includes a ‘restricted’ license for concealed carry, to be used only when going to or from target practice or hunting; and a ‘non-restricted’ license for public places. Permitting offices in New York have been known to refuse New York Citizens their right to carry a gun in public for no reason other than the failure to prove ‘proper cause.’ Those who are issued their God-given right through the power of the Democrat legislature (which are hardly any in NYC), must jump through a series of hoops, spend an unreasonable amount of money and wait a full (1) year probation period. The 2nd Amendment does not say, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, as long as the New York legislature agrees.”

Finally, the long-awaited decision by the Supreme Court in a case called New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen, gave New York State the good old fashion legislative spanking it deserved when it determined that the show of ‘proper cause’ to exercise a God-given right is in fact a violation of the Constitution.

Non-elected “Governor” Kathy Hochul was infuriated that she can no longer control the rights of New Yorkers. Upon learning of the Supreme Court decision, Hochul said in a tweet:

“It is outrageous that at a moment of national reckoning on gun violence, the Supreme Court has recklessly struck down a New York law that limits those who can carry concealed weapons.”

She also said in response to this ruling,

“We are closely reviewing our options, including calling a special session of the legislature. Just as we swiftly passed nation-leading gun reform legislation, I will continue to do everything in my power to keep New Yorkers safe from gun violence.”

Apparently, the appointed “Governor” only wants to disarm her Constituents, because if she really wanted to protect New Yorkers from violence, she wouldn’t let out nearly 200 prisoners from Rikers Island. If Hochul is to benefit from creating a victim/predator society in New York State, she sure seems committed to achieving it.

In a video referring to the decision, Kathy Hochul revealed her disdain toward the rights of the people when she tried making a plea to her victim-minded supporters. She said, “shocking, absolutely shocking that they have taken away our right to have reasonable restrictions.”

Sorry Kathy, you don’t have a “right” to violate others’ rights. Hochul then went on a desperate rant to try and compare gun restrictions to not being able to yell fire in a crowded theater. When the gun grabbers resort to this type of behavior, everyone knows they have lost the argument. In this case, it would seem our Founding Fathers came back to give Hochul the kick in the pants she deserves.

Hochul went on to say, “but somehow there’s no restrictions on the 2nd Amendment.”

Correct Kathy. There certainly shouldn’t be any restrictions to the 2nd Amendment. Whether you like it or not, real Americans will continue to defeat you and your mission to make New Yorkers unarmed and helpless. We will continue to knock down your unconstitutional laws. God gives us the right to defend our lives. You Democrats do not have the authority to override that. As much as you would like to be, you are not God.

In typical left-wing, emotionally reactive fashion, New York City Mayor Eric Adams couldn’t hold back his frustration with the new ruling. He took desperate measures by pleading with people in a press conference to refrain from purchasing firearms following this new court decision. Adams said in a press conference that they will “start to define sensitive locations when carrying a gun is banned.” Adams couldn’t resist using the typical anti-gun rhetoric when he said, “We cannot allow New York to become the wild, wild west.” In a last-ditch effort to instill fear in the hearts of those who don’t know any better Adams said, “having a gun presence in your home is heightening the risk of your family.” Ironically, none of the media representatives reminded him that the new ruling doesn’t do away with background checks. Is Adams admitting that he has no faith in the failed background check system? Maybe Mayor Adams hates the idea that good people will finally be able to defend themselves against the violent predators he lets walk the streets of the once admired New York City.


About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is available for Press Commentary. For more information contact PR HERE

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on the Sean Hannity Show, NRATV, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun-owners.

Dan Wos
Dan Wos
Subscribe
Notify of
66 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
swmft

you thought all those decaying cities with wars in the the street depicted in movies were post apocalyptical, no just democrat controlled cities share the wealth policies

Last edited 1 month ago by swmft
Chuck

This is how Civil Wars start.

KK

Coast to coast, in free states, and in communist states, the problem is the same. Mostly minority gangs, and criminals, ALL WITH ILLEGAL GUNS, no background checks, ignore magazine capacity restrictions, SHOOTING UP THE PLACE, turning even NYC into the “Wild West”. (That’s right Adams)
They are a danger to the public, they are a danger to the police.

LEGAL CONCEALED CARRIERS ARE NOT A PROBLEM ANYWHERE!

swmft

and would help rid the cities of the gangs

ExGob

Obviously, Hochul isn’t smart enough to realize that only law abiding citizens obey the laws, and they are not the ones we need to be concerned about. Lawbreakers don’t give a damn about the laws; they do as they please, regardless. So she wants to assure the culprits that they won’t meet with resistance from their victims, and she wants the innocents to know that she believes they have no rights to self protection and will be charged as lawbreakers if they are caught carrying a firearm. Now, which do you fear the most; the criminal’s actions or Hochul’s laws?… Read more »

DDS

You’re concerned that the Governor Hochul of New York State might be stupid.

Not a fan of Bill Maher,but he is one of the more principled and inteligent of the leftists.

Watch this clip from his interview with Senator Mark Pryor taken from the movie “Religulous” and see if it doesn’t clarify things a bit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_QDA6Y6cp8

shinyo

what do you mean failed background check system. you most be a lefty in cognito

john

Criminals now control the NYS government this woman was not elected she was just the next criminal democrat in line for the job. Crime rate up at unheard of levels never before seen in that state. The news yesterday told how a black women was arrested 100 times in a row for stealing from stores. She has not served 1 min in jail or payed a fine just set free over and over again. The black women interviewed said it is her new job she called it “perjuring” what she wants and she is going to continue more of the… Read more »

swmft

ny has ben run by criminals since the civil war ,and the federal government looked the other way nothing has changed

Doug G.

I remember the talk before this case came down and how far reaching and grand it would be for 2A supporters. I thought at the time that, in keeping with other recent SC decisions, this case would be decided and applied narrowly. It seems we both were wrong. It appears as though the other 6 states with “may issue” laws are acting to comply with this decision, sort of, but only so far as the “justifiable need” qualification is concerned. Hardly 2A utopia. Thanks given to Justice Thomas’ verbiage in the opinion, they’ve struck upon a new loophole of ‘being… Read more »

Wild Bill

As those “May issue” statutes were unconstitutional and denied people their Constitutional Right, maybe class action suits would be the remedy.
Come on all you ambulance chasing lawyers out there, there are huge amounts of cash to be made!!!

swmft

and the people going against court ruling do not have qualified ,immunity so unlimited liability first cop that gets burned in court will be the last one enforcing these “laws”

Mike

The democrats in New York, and everywhere else, will do what they want (as they always do) and nothing will be done about it. It’s why this country is where it is now with all the bullshit social justice crap. They’re never happy with a slice of the pie, the always demand the entire fscking bakery…

swmft

Can we throw them in the oven ,cook them till crisp

Jose

Loosers…!!

Boz

Dems/Libs/socialists/marxists never have a problem ignoring laws, rules, regulations, court rulings, etc. when it suits them. Let anyone else try that and see what happens.

james

Can the Court hold these politicians in contempt of court by using the US Marshall’s?

Desert Guy

There is nothing in the Constitution or U.S. Code allowing such. Governments are immune from prosecution.

james

Politicians are not the government. The NY Governor has made it public that she will ignore the SCOTUS.

The Court’s unlimited power to compel obedience and compliance of its orders. Under Article 142, the Supreme Court has been given the power to make an order in regard to the contempt of Court. That is, the Supreme Court can compel any person under this Article to obey the order which it has given.

Last edited 1 month ago by james
xtphreak

Dude

Methinks you did a Google and wound up in the Constitution of INDIA.

JayWPB

How can the ILA keep calling it their win when it’s the “New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen”?

Doug G.

NRA is affiliated with NYSRPA and helped fund the case. That’s how.

CaptainKerosene

SCOTUS has no power to make l o wee courts follow rulings. Lower court judges often ignite the Justises. Lower court Jud as sh I Ulf be impeached.

Rob

translation please……

Wild Bill

Due to its power of judicial review, the Supreme Court plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power, including lower courts.

john

Justice is no longer being served ,,, you are 100% correct though the elected now feel that they are law and order and above the law that protects all americans equally.

grant

The DemonRats will most likely try to make ‘Everywhere’ a ‘Gun-Free-Zone’.
NY is already going to make the subway one, imagine that, one of the most dangerous places in the city to be, and you cannot defend yourself?
Anyway, what will happen is all these restrictions will face to SCOTUS relatively fast and be shot down, again.

james

All of NY City is a gun free zone because Albany likes it that way.

Boz

l am Bernie Goetz. l am Paul Kersey.

JSNMGC

That is not the reason.

xtphreak

“…expanding the category of “sensitive places” simply to all places of public congregation that are not isolated from law enforcement defines the category of “sensitive places” far too broadly. Respondents’ argument would in effect exempt cities from the Second Amendment and would eviscerate the general right to publicly carry arms for self-defense that we discuss in detail below. See Part III–B, infra. Put simply, there is no historical basis for New York to effectively declare the island of Manhattan a “sensitive place” simply because it is crowded and protected generally by the New York City Police Department …”. NEW YORK… Read more »

Montana454Casull

This is proof that Democrats think laws are for the rest of us to follow but not them
They think they are exempt from all laws !

Desert Guy

Governments are exempt from laws.

swmft

that is what they think, and why the founders chose to arm the people,wont listen bang next

Cam

The the government won’t follow the law then why should anyone?

Yote Hunter

That is most evident in Biden and his administration IGNORING enforcement of Federal immigration laws!
Joe Biden et al have no legal right to decide WHICH Federal laws they obey and enforce.
Cherry picking is not an option!
Thus Biden’s government is doing the illegal in more ways than one.

CourageousLion

“It is outrageous that at a moment of national reckoning on gun violence, the Supreme Court has recklessly struck down a New York law that limits those who can carry concealed weapons.” Says the demented bitch. “Gun violence”? Where do they come up with these moronic ideas? ANYONE who thinks a “law” is going to stop criminals that VIOLATE LAWS, is deranged and living in an alternate reality. What she is effectively doing is making more victims of the criminals that don’t follow laws and carry concealed and use whatever they can steal or buy on the street. SHALL NOT… Read more »

TGP389

It must have been bliss to live in their make believe land where crimes of violence did not occur before firearms were invented.

swmft

she should be dragged out and flogged

Rob

Don’t forget the tar and feathers!

Rebel VA

And the rough cut 2 x 4 rail out of town!

Buckshot

Apparently New Yorkers are less trustworthy than Vermonters where there has never been a concealed carry license requirement. I usually cite Vermont since it’s in the same geographical location.

swmft

but the demoncrats have been chipping away at Vermonters freedoms mag limit bans ten rounds only

Buckshot

That may be so but it doesn’t negate the fact that Vermont has never had a concealed carry license scheme and it isn’t the “wild west” like gun grabbers claim there will be if their schemes are not enacted or are repealed. That state alone puts the lie to their arguments as do all the others that haven’t devolved into lawlessness. Wisconsin has been concealed carry for over ten years now and the only place crimes with guns is a problem is the Dem run city of Milwaukee.

swmft

it has been proposed so far the left has not been able to overcome Vermonters individuality even a lot of the progressives believe to each his own there, yea I have family there and land, there are enough guns in the cabin to sink a ship,never need to bring one to hunt just clean and oil before and after never had a break in or theft

Raconteur

Great write-up Dan!

“..recklessly struck down a New York law that limits those who can carry concealed weapons.”

So, she is complaining about not being able to control what is now, legal carry of guns. Because the citizens who would legally carry guns (without “proper cause”) are the problem? How does (did) the “proper cause” law stop illegal carry of guns by criminals?

Last edited 1 month ago by Raconteur
CourageousLion

She needs to go back to 1st grade and work on her reason, logic and common sense. She seems to have none of those.

swmft

she IS a democrat

Xaun Loc

Anyone with any sense knew this is exactly where such a ruling would lead. The NY state legislature will now work on a two-pronged attack: (1) setting up a “Shall issue” permit system with requirements that still block most people from qualifying. They can easily set the age requirement higher than just the usual 21, require a probationary period of holding a premises permit before being eligible for a carry permit, require excessive levels of training (which won’t be available), require liability insurance, etc., etc. (2) they will declare as many places as possible to be “sensitive places” — certainly… Read more »

CourageousLion

Quit giving the morons ideas, just in case they read Ammo Land.

Arny

And the citizens can just as easily overlook their requirements just as the Govt Clowns overlook the SC ruling. It’s up to the people if they want to support each other against the clowns or not. Or will they bow down to their Gods again ?

JSNMGC

“Their” most terrifying scenario is that enforcers will stop enforcing their unconscionable laws. So far, they have nothing to worry about.

TexDad

“struck down a New York law that limits those who can carry concealed weapons.”

– to only those with money, power, and political connections.

Fixed it for you, tyrant.

swmft

something that should never have been allowed.

Wass

Why is it never “a moment of national reckoning on gun violence” every weekend in Chicago?

swmft

the violence in the big cities is gang related, the demoncrats need the gangs to instill fear in the people so they will vote for them to stop violence that they have no intension of stopping

Norm

Illinois has been “shall issue” for years.

CaptainKerosene

After a LONG LLICENSING process and many obstacles

BigJim

Yes but the FOID system is absolutely unconstitiounal on its face. Compliance is agreement.

Jaque

The Communist Biden Regime’s DOJ will not lift a finger against NY and any other entity that fails to adhere with the ruling. America today is ruled by a Communist regime with total disregard for the law. And as long as Americans accept this, America as we knew her will cease to exist.

Rowboat

What is tolerated will continue.
New Yorkers themselves will need to continue the fight for their god given Rights.
Bravo to the New York Rifle and Pistol Association for the SCOTUS win , but you have some tough work ahead. The swamp creatures will do “ whatever it takes “ to thwart the win . Stay strong, stay armed, the fat lady hasn’t sang yet.

swmft

congress can impeach attorney general and all other department heads for not doing their job including poopy pants , after first of next year may have new everyone in government

linkman

Hochul said:

the Supreme Court of the United States of America has stripped away the state of New York’s right and responsibility to protect its citizens with a decision”

That is totally and 100% incorrect. NY still has the right to protect its citizens. As for the responsibility to protect, apparently that’s up to NY to do or not to do — but they certainly weren’t doing it before this ruling.

Green Mtn. Boy

Of course NY state will defy the SCOTUS decision and the Constitution,they are Marxist’s,there is a way to force them into compliance with the US Constitution but it won’t be pleasant or painless. Other than that they are going to do what ever they can to negate the law of the land,it’s what Marxist’s do. The N Y state governor said “Shocking,just shocking,that they have taken away our right to have reasonable restrictions on firearms in place”. I’d like for her to quote me chapter and verse, just where that language is in the Bill Of Rights,as in all the… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by Green Mtn. Boy
Russn8r

DemComs are fighting a war to destroy the USA. Repubs pretend it’s a game of Badminton & play by Marquis of Queensberry Rules.

Nothing in the Constitution says NY or the U.S. DoJ have to obey court decisions on constitutionality, but sissy Rs OBEY even decisions done in clear intentional subversion.

It’s convenient to claim the oath = “OBEY the SupCt”, so pols can do patently subversive laws & EOs and claim they honored the oath since it’s up to the court.

DoJ Bruen.png
CourageousLion

The department of JUSTUS is run by idiots if they actually use the term “gun violence”. Plus I respectfully (not really, I say fuck them) disagree with the department of justus disagreement. They morons don’t understand SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED? Is it THAT difficult?