2nd Amendment Ruling is Changing Everything for Gun Rights ~ VIDEO

Dan Wos, Author of – Good Gun Bad Guy
Host of The Loaded Mic

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- It seems, the gun-grabbing state legislators and Governors had no idea what they were in for with the New York State Rifle and Pistol v. Bruen case.

They poked the 2nd Amendment bear one too many times and it seems to have backfired on them. Because of Justice Thomas’ carefully and strategically written decision, current and future gun laws will likely be scrutinized and required to meet “historical precedent.”

At a certain point during the anticipation of the Supreme Court NYSRPA v. Bruen decision, it started to become clear that the case would be decided in favor of gun rights. What was unclear was the way the decision would be written. State legislatures had a lot of leeway after the Heller and McDonald cases and they used every bit of leverage they had to continue violating the rights of American gun owners despite those two favorable rulings. All that has changed because Justice Clarence Thomas had some very interesting wording in his Bruen decision. Besides the text that referred to the right to carry a gun not depending on service in the militia and the portion that stated, “We conclude that respondents have failed to meet their burden to identify an American tradition justifying New York’s proper cause requirement,” the decision was written in a way that now requires all gun laws to meet a level of historic balance.

It appears that anti-gun lawmakers will now have a much more difficult time restricting the rights of the people they represent.

The provision to meet historical precedent reads as follows:

“In keeping with Heller, we hold that when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. To justify its regulation, the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest. Rather, the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.”

According to wusa9.com Attorney and Rhode Island Democratic State Rep. Robert Craven, said he would study the New York case to determine whether Rhode Island’s requirements could be challenged, and whether that can be remedied by legislation. He questioned whether the high court will now employ a strict interpretation of the Second Amendment — that the right to bear arms is absolute — and apply it to other laws, such as those banning military-style weapons.

“I see the court headed in that direction,” Craven said.

On June 27th, 2022 it was reported that Attorney Chuck Michel, who heads up the California Rifle & Pistol Association said the standard will affect three prominent California laws in particular. These cases are pending before a federal appellate court.

• Legal challenges to the state’s limits on assault weapons
• Requirement for background checks for buying ammunition
• Ban on online ammunition sales

“All of these laws should be struck down under this new Supreme Court standard,” Michel said.

On June 28th, 2022, According to Reason.com The district court’s judgment on California’s “assault weapons” ban had been vacated, and the case was remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the new Bruen decision.

Ammoland News correspondent Rob Morse, of The SlowFacts Blog and Self-Defense Gun Stories Podcast had this to say:

“Carry permit regulations are only the tip of the Bruen iceberg. The court also clarified how 2nd Amendment cases should be considered. This will change everything from red-flag laws, assault weapon bans, to gun free zones and more. Send forth the horde of lawyers. The 2A lawsuits have just begun.”

Despite the narrative by which they are sold to the public, California gun laws have been notorious for restricting the rights of law-abiding Californians while doing nothing to reduce violent crime. This new SCOTUS decision has put California gun laws in question, caused New Jersey Governor to reverse course on his draconian gun measures, and has worked New York Democrats into a lather as they desperately search for new ways to control the rights of New Yorkers. We are in a very important time, and it looks like there is a good opportunity to drag the Democrats back to civics class and force them to reread the Constitution, with a special focus on Amendment number 2.

Shall Not Be Infringed!

The 2nd Amendment is not a privilege. It’s your right.
Dan Wos
Author – Good Gun Bad Guy
Host – The Loaded Mic


About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is available for Press Commentary. For more information contact PR HERE

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on the Sean Hannity Show, NRATV, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun-owners.

Dan Wos
Dan Wos
Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wass

“Reminding them of the Constitution” won’t work as well as shaming them for failing to to favor punishing gun perps. With them, it’s always about guns, and that’s their weak point. Let’s exploit it,

StLPro2A

Despite what Slo Joe’s handlers write in grade school big letters on those Cheat Sheet Cards for Slo Joe to slobber over, “….shall not be infringed” followed only by a PERIOD appears clearly pretty damn ABSOLUTE. There are no clauses requiring sporting purpose suitability, “Need” citations, features/dimension/function criteria, permission slips, et el, et el. But, for the sake of argument, were there a “Need” clause, the very fact that our government and police have fully auto ARs, large capacity magazines, et el, is all the Need that We The Little Peeps NEED to NEED those items, as taught again and… Read more »

john

Democrats care little for the law haven’t we seen enough evidence of this in there plot against President Trump. One committee and hearing after another with the same results. Taxpayers pick up the tab while the elected lie daily.
The elite will stop at nothing to remove guns from law abiding Americans. They care nothing for the constitution which they now altar in the lower courts. Till challenged in the supreme court that we must hold accountable for its rulings. Political views and talking points have no place when it comes to the rule of law and the constitution.

swmft

the kangaroo courts are all mad that scotus is sinking their woke ideas and ushering back reason
the double speak is telling they want to do away with rule of law

Last edited 1 month ago by swmft
Patriot Solutions

I have yet to see felons who would be armed for constitutionally protected purposes excluded in Bruen and DENIED their rights as in past rulings although I have yet been able to read Bruen beyond the bits and pieces I see being posted and I do remember Clarence saying in the past that 2A is an acceptable defense to felon in possesion of a firearm charge. Amy has also made a similar statement prior to being appointed on the supreme jester court.

Russn8r

Futile? They’re already subverting, even ignoring Bruen: Oppressive tax, training, liability, insurance etc. It’ll take decades to overcome if Ds-RINOs don’t take the court & reverse Bruen thanks to:

* Invasion, deluge immigration (redistribute voting control; high pop density-urbanization puts Dems in charge).

* SCOTUS. TX v PA consequences. A de facto right of states to allow-collude in theft of federal elections paves the way for gun control & anti-gun confirmations.

2A legal priests POV: Subversion is ‘futile’ if overturned in 10yrs. Meanwhile, was it futile if you’re convicted carrying or murdered unarmed when you can’t afford a permit?

Last edited 1 month ago by Russn8r
Chuck

As soon as this decision came out, Liberals circled the wagons and began plotting how to get around any obstacles this ruling raised against their plans to disarm Americans.

Boz

The victory in D.C. vs Heller was also supposed to dramatically change things, yet Iib cities continue to trample people’s rights. Many Iib governors, mayors and A.G.’s say that they will just ignore this ruling as well. That doesn’t seem to work out too well for Republicans, but Libs always seem to get away with it.

Russn8r

Repubs act like they have to pretend they’re playing badminton under Marquis of Queensberry Rules.

CommieLibs know they’re fighting a war to end the USA. Long experience tells them they will never be held accountable for anything.

Paraphrasing Stalin: “How many divisions does the SupCt have?”

Cappy

So, does this mean we all get a refund on our Concealed Carry license fees? When can I expect to get that check?

swmft

12th of never

Chuck

:…and that’s a long long time.”

DDS

Septober 83rd

Henry Bowman

As the decision in NYSRPA v Bruen strikes down the majority of extant gun infringements, all without so much as a jot or tittle from the NRA, but lots of pages from GOA, FPC, and SAF, then little Quisling Harold may just be out of a job!! With no anti-gun bills to scare people into joining the NRA, how will Radioactive Wayne con anyone anymore? People won’t donate to NRA, but are repeatedly donating to all other gun groups… With the NRA on the verge of being dropped into the dustbin of history for Wayne’s role in bribing the RINO… Read more »

Norm

NYSRPA is the NY branch of the NRA. This is as much an NRA victory as the NYSRPA’s.

Russn8r

A state affiliate is not the NRA. If NYSRPA equaled NRA, there would’ve been no money for the lawsuit, having all been pocketed by the “Winning Team” grifters over the last 25yrs, the geniuses who bankrupted the NRA & bared its neck to the NYAG, like LaPew’s grifter attorney, already paid over $100 million of member cash, who grifter LaPew said is “the only thing keeping me out of jail”.

NRA treason 2.png
Henry Bowman

That’s a hell of a statement coming from Whiny LaTrine. I think I’d like to save that, if you can shoot me a link, I’d really appreciate that!

Russn8r

I think it’s in a bankruptcy &/or AcMc lawsuit depo. I stopped following after I learned overconfident Journey & his idiot Texas attys ignored any & all input from former reform board members, thereby bungled the chance to keep NRA in b/k. You can probly find it on NRA In Danger.

Last edited 1 month ago by Russn8r
Henry Bowman

When I say NRA, I do NOT mean state affiliates… I am referring exclusively to the HQ in Fairfax. Those guys are worse than useless. But you know who jumped in to assist NYSRPA?? GOA, FPC, SAF, etc. I’m more interested who actually contributes than those who falsely claim sole credit after having done literally nothing!

As for Radioactive Wayne paying the RINO 15 $43M to vote for S2938, that proves where the problem is, and it all points to Fairfax, not NY!

Ram

You have reached a good perspective. Henry Bowman is also correct, for far too long the NRA and its board of directors have
only modulated the argument, milking the cash cow. My loyalty
is still with the membership. The NRA leadership has become insulated, surrounded by industry reps and politicians. They
use marketing ploys instead of strategizing towards a win.
They follow consultants rather than the needs of the members,
their elitism has bred an arrogance. That said, it may still be salvageable, despite the recent election results, which suggests
a self-destruction is somehow desired by the elitist minds.

Patriot Solutions

Just imagine all the people wrongly convicted and jailed using un-constitutional rules. Lot’s of them are still in jail today even after the Bruen ruling. I’m guessing lot’s more will still end up in jail despite the Bruen ruling.

Did ATF adjust their rules in accordance with Bruen or Heller?

swmft

imagine atf finding themselves in jumpsuits on other side of bars for all the illegal things they have done but i was just following orders….shades of Nuremberg

Chuck

No, but the SCOTUS decision regarding EPA Law Making potentially has implications against all Bureaucratic Law Making. SCOTUS affirmed that creating Laws is solely the Legislature’s responsibility, not Unelected Bureaucrats.
Going on that, ATF must first,, and can only petition Congress to change the Law. They do not have the authority under the Constitution to do it all by their little lonesome, nor because the Executive says to.

swmft

and they do need to get their peepees swacked and sent home no pay hoping rare breed takes them down. if ffls cant sell them then internet sites with no saved data

swmft

and for those of you that dont have a forced reset trigger , if you have numbness in fingers you cant feal trigger reset follow up shots are slow this lets you get that just missed second shot fast

john

Removing are freedoms is the democratic agenda The narrative of propaganda we now see coming from Washington’s elected elite is disturbing. For democrats to continue their march to goblisum they need to disarm the americam public. Why is so hard to understand the elites agenda of a one party government that rules over the people. Are the american people understanding that 60 to 70 % of what they earn will go to this socialist democratic party the government. The Republican party in washington are so divided that they continue to fail their party members on every level.When Liz Cheney and… Read more »

Grigori

I agree with you! While you did cover it, it cannot be stated enough that RINO Republicans are as much a danger to our freedom as the Democrats, maybe more. Turncoats like Lindsey Graham, Mitch (the b!tch) McConnell, even our beloved DJT (aka Mr Bumpstock Ban) play us for fools at every election, as we elect them and their ilk because “we don’t want a damn Democrat in there”. The thing is, they are really no different from the Democrats and in their own special little underhanded way, do the work of The New World Order in ways the Democrats… Read more »

john

Thank you
Sad but true
We seem to be reverting back in time 246 years before this country became independent.I wonder if I am the only one who sees the connection. As our history is erased daily no longer taught in schools while statues such as Teddy Roosevelt are removed along with civil war monuments that show a time in this country when so many lost so much.
I watched this past week a special explanations the debunked climate change on news max Kevin Sorbo hosted that. I am betting not many watched the truth be told.

https://www.movieguide.org/news-articles/kevin-sorbo-reveals-the-unsettling-truth-behind-climate-change-in-new-documentary.html

Russn8r

You know that old Senator Mitch?
He’s leading us into a ditch.
Cause selling us out
Is what Mitch is about
Turns out that he’s Xi Xing Ping’s bitch.

McConnell dick Xing.png