When did .22 Shorts Become More Expensive than .22 LR?

Graph showing historic prices of .22lr and .22 short.

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)-– The short answer is: 1987.

.22 Short rimfire cartridges became more expensive than .22 Long Rifle rimfire cartridges in 1987. They have remained more expensive since then.

This correspondent has been able to obtain manufacturer price list information for .22 Shorts from 1911 to 1996, and .22 Long Rifle
ammunition from 1911 to 2022. That is 111 years of pricing history. Of the 111 years, this correspondent was able to collect data for 70 individual years. There are enough data points to give shape to the curve.

There are several ways to measure the value of money, and how it changes over time.

You can choose a particular commodity. Gold has been popular. Determine what an ounce of gold has cost in dollars over time. This was easy when the price of gold was fixed by the US government (the gold standard) from 1789 to 1932, at 20 dollars per troy ounce.

It became dubious from 1934 to 1973-74, because the price was set at $35 per ounce, but you could not legally own gold in the United States.  After 1974, the dollar was completely decoupled from the price of gold, so the dollar prices are readily available.

In 1911, a round of .22 Short cost .625 cents. Gold was 20 dollars an ounce, so a .22 short cost of .0003125 troy ounces of gold. Today, that much gold costs 57.8 cents. Using the same measure, a Long Rifle in 1911 cost .000347 ounces of gold, or 69.4 cents of gold using the price of gold in 2022.

In 2022, a Long Rife cartridge costs about 8 cents, or .000043 ounces of gold at 2022 prices.  The price of a Long Rifle in 2022 is almost exactly 1/8 the amount of gold it costs in 1911.

A second method is to choose a basket of commodities, and determine how many dollars it takes to purchase the same, or roughly equivalent goods, in a given year. This is commonly referred to as constant dollars, with one year chosen as the constant to be used as the standard.

A third method is to determine the buying power of an hour of labor, and measure how many hours of labor it takes to purchase a similar amount of things at different years. You can choose a level of skill for the labor. Unskilled is a fairly consistent way to compare labor.

In 1911, unskilled labor could be had for as low as 10 cents an hour, or about .005 ounces of gold. In 2022, unskilled labor is about $7.25 per hour or .0039 ounces of gold.

In  1935, an hour of unskilled labor could be had for .0043 ounces of gold, but you were no longer allowed to own gold. A .22 short cost .36 cents per round, or nominally, .00102 ounces of gold.

1n 1967, unskilled labor was $1 per hour, or nominally .029 ounces of gold.  The price of gold was set at $35 per ounce. But, you were not allowed to own gold.  A .22 short cost 1.3 cents, or nominally .00037 ounces of gold.

In 1980, unskilled labor was $3.10 per hour. Gold was about $600 per troy ounce. 1 hour of labor was valued at .0051 ounces of gold. A .22 short cost .000034 ounces of gold, about 1/9 of the amount of gold it costs in 1911.

The above-unskilled labor rates may vary somewhat from those calculated in the chart. They are chosen as examples.

The relationship of gold to .22 ammunition was greatly distorted by the price control the government put on gold and the legal prohibition of owning gold.

This correspondent chose unskilled labor as the measure because commodities are very difficult to compare over a century, and gold prices were used directly as money, then artificially repressed by government edict.

Once a standard is chosen to determine the value of a dollar, you can determine the value of an item, in the past, in today’s (2022) dollars.

For consistency, the prices are those of smokeless high velocity .22 rimfire cartridges. Shorts were chosen with 29-grain bullets. Long Rifle cartridges were chosen with 40-grain bullets.  The prices are all from one highly successful American manufacturer.

This correspondent was curious as to when Shorts became more expensive than Long Rifles. It was in 1987. Presumably, the greater demand for Long Rifle cartridges introduced efficiencies of scale which overcame the advantage of a smaller amount of brass, lead, and powder.  The priming compound, manufacturing process, and labor costs would be nearly identical.

The greatest differential between Long Rifle and Short prices occurred during World War I and just after World War II.  In 1917 and in 1947, a Short round cost 60% of what a Long Rifle cost.

According to my scale, a .22 Short uses 2 grains less brass than a .22 Long Rifle. It uses 11 grains less lead, and about .6 grains less powder.

Industrial brass is running about $3 a pound. Lead is about $1 per pound. Nitrocellulose at industrial scales is about $1 per pound. Converted to gunpowder it may be $2 a pound on an industrial scale.

The production cost of a Short is thus about .26 cents per round cheaper because of lower material costs (in 2022).  As the popularity of Shorts diminished, the scale costs of shorter runs of cartridges may account for part of their increased price.

As this is written, ammunition prices are falling, and .22 Shorts cost about 30% more than .22 Long Rifle cartridges.

Shorts have become another specialty ammunition, while Long Rifle cartridges have become a commodity.


About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Dean Weingarten

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Laddyboy

7/16/2022 – Just bought a 50 round of CCI mini mag, 1260 FPS, from a MD Walmart. The cost was $11.63. Thought you would be curious. Thus the cost per round was $0.2326. OUTRAGIOUS for 22 LR. BUT—IF you want the ammo, you will pay the price!

Bob K

Using gold as a comparison is really skewed due to the government price control then.

Rock

I noticed that a while back when my supplier said he had a brick of shorts… HOLY S**T !!! I could get two bricks of LR for the price of the brick of shorts !!!! He has a brick of longs right now for about 1 1/2 the LR price. UNREAL !

Big George

HUH?! A quick on-line search showed Ammoseek.com, has CCI Standard Velocity .22cal. LR $16.99 for 100rds. and the same .22cal. Shorts $15.99. Geeeee, really expensive! Sure, this ain’t my Granddad’s Walmart, or mine, where a 500rd. ‘brick’ was $10 bucks, but these days just finding available ammo is a good thang!

Skeeter

My Dad told me years ago, that all he ever shot thru his Winchester model 90 was shorts, they were 5 or 6 cents a box, and they put food on the table.That old Winchester is still a tack driver, but no longer shoots the prohibitively expensive shorts.

45crittergitter

The real, on-the-street answer is not 1987, but 10-15 years earlier.

TexDad

Grandpa shot so many shorts, because they were cheaper, through his pump action .22 that the barrel eroded a bit just in front of the case mouth. If you shoot a .22lr the case expands into the eroded ring and is a real pain to get out.

So we have to keep shorts on hand in case one of the kids wants to shoot great grandpa’s gun.

Still a great shooter.

Rob

You have too much idle time on your hands to waste on useless and meaningless statistics. Shakespeare had it right: “Much ado about nothing.”

45crittergitter

Next up: A centennial study of .22 Long prices…

Chuck

My wife has an old H&R revolver that’s chambered in .22 Short, she inherited from her Grandmother in the late 80’s. At that time,, running across any .22 Short locally was a very rare rarity. I see it occasionally now, but it’s usually higher than .22 LR, so we’ve not picked any up. I really need to take that gun in and have it checked out, as we’ve no clue when the Ol’ gal bought it.
As I’ve other .22’s, it’s never been a priority. One of these days…

DarthKur

As far as I remeber the only old H&R revolver that was 22 short, exclusively, was the Young American Double Action. It’s a small, nickle plated revolver that was manufactured between 1884 – 1941. The ones made before 1905 were made for black powder rounds. If the revolver does not have the caliber stamped on the barrel then it is one of these BP era ones. The only modern ammo advisable for those would be a 22 Flobert. Ones with the inscription, post 1905, can be used more easily acquired ammo but I’d stick with CCI CB Shorts, which have… Read more »

MICHAEL J

The very first time I fired the 22 short was in all places San Francisco. “Playland at the Beach” circa 1968 had an amusement park where 25 cents could get you 10 shots from a rifle with crooked sights via a tube fed pump. Moving metal ducks and spinning stars were the only casualties. It was just a blast with no one getting offended or worried about a carnival shooting gallery with real guns.
Simpler times and political correctness wasn’t invented then. How I miss those days.

Ope

Me too. My first handgun was purchased in ‘73. I went to the hardware store with my father in law picked out my revolver and paid with cash. The man gave me a written carbon copy receipt and we left. That’s it. No such thing as a 4473 back in those days.