U.S.A. — “Proud of my colleague, @bradhoylman for getting our bill, A2893A/S0580A passed in the Senate!” Queens Assemblymember Jessica González-Rojas tweeted Wednesday. “This legislation backed by @NYAGV1, @Everytown, @TheHAVI, @bradybuzz & more is a White House proposal. Let’s address gun violence with health solutions & pass it in the @NYSA_Majority!”
In summation, gun prohibitionists are once more demonizing guns rather than the violent criminals who abuse them and mischaracterizing evil behavior by aberrant individuals as a public health issue. So, what’s this bill they’re claiming provides “solutions”?
“Medicaid would reimburse violence prevention programs in New York under a proposal advanced Tuesday in the state Senate,” Rochester’s Spectrum News 1 claims in a story González-Rojas shared.
“Under the proposal, a Medicaid beneficiary who has been involved in or injured by community violence and has received a health care referral would be eligible,” the report recounts, noting “California, Connecticut and Illinois have been granted similar approval to use Medicaid for violence prevention programs.”
Senate backer Hoylman took full advantage of the free publicity to virtue signal.
“In our hospitals, there’s a revolving door of gun violence injury that disproportionately hurts young people of color,” he declared. Left unsaid was who was disproportionately hurting them. And that’s in spite of all the New York gun laws he demands, including requiring firearms (that will forever be untraceable to the criminals using them) to microstamp ammunition.
“With our bill, hospitals in partnership with community violence prevention programs will receive federal support to not only treat their patients’ immediate injuries, but also help prevent their future physical and mental harm,” Hoylman promised with a straight face. How transferring tax booty into more Democrat boondoggles would actually “prevent… future physical and mental harm” was left unstated, and the Spectrum reporter evidently didn’t think to ask.
“Gun violence is a state-wide health epidemic and it requires swift and effective health solutions,” González-Rojas chimed in, again leaving key questions unasked, let alone unaddressed. First, if it’s “statewide,” it can’t by definition be an “epidemic,” because, as economist John Lott’s research demonstrates, occurrences are limited to “a small set of urban areas, and even in those counties, murders are concentrated in small areas inside them.”
That makes fair the question “Are Hoylman and González-Rojas lying, incompetent, or both?” The only certainty is that as far as Everytown and Brady’s involvements are concerned, the answer narrows down to one option.
Ditto for the White House, which González-Rojas tells us “has recognized this and recommends the billing of Medicaid for community violence intervention programs.” Of course, it does. And of course, that’s what encouraged Democrat-dominated California, Connecticut, and Illinois to jump on the bandwagon, with New York running to catch up and other “blue” states seeing an opportunity to jump in.
“The hope is the measure would result in a reduction in violent injuries in the future,” Spectrum’s publicity release masked as the news concludes. “Supporters pointed to a reduction in violence after hospital-based violence intervention programs were introduced.”
As the saying I can’t entirely repeat here goes, you can wish in one hand and do something else in another. As for the reduction in violence claim the piece goes out on, how about pointing the rest of us to what we’re told supporters pointed to?
How big of a reduction? When? Where? Got proof?
Or is everybody just supposed to buy into the claim that gangsters alter their violent behavior because Democrats once more slopped some favored bureaucratic troughs with tax plunder coerced out of the productive sector?
About David Codrea:
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.
Looking at the picture above; I see the Woman on helman’s right barely able to refrain from BUSTING OUT IN A BELLY LAUGH. The Woman on helman’s left facial expression is SCREAMING — “W H A T?”! Such FOOLHARDINESS out of as State’s HIRED HELP! Just ANOTHER ATTEMPT by the DemoKKKrats to BANKRUPT America using the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO HANDBOOK!!!!!
those two are their to get money for their kids and grandkids, dont shoot anyone today get paid ,same shit they are trying in comifornia pay gang members not to fight using medicare money
The Leftists will say that your D. R. T. solution will be unfair to their constituents.
Not making a pie in the sky prediction. It’s already been done here in FL.
“Gun violence” is not a “state-wide health epidemic” rather violence is a socio-economic based symptom that will continue so long as it’s underlying cause remains unaddressed. Doctors do not treat cases of pneumonia with vasectomy, they do not treat a broken leg with an appendectomy, they do not treat MRSA with a pancreatectomy, and no one will stop violence by removing a tool used during the act of violence (as is in full evidence in the anti’s poster child countries such as Australia or England). And I won’t even argue the obvious stupidity of punishing the elderly, infirm, and economically… Read more »
Gun Violence, how about vehicle violence for DUI DWI or Reckless?
It is human violence. They just do not give up their anti RTKBA.
We have to call minority violence as gun violence, since older folks made it illegal to be honest about all cultures not being the same.
It is like when a tourist gets attacked by a minority, and they say but America is supposed to be safe. Then, someone kindly tells them that safe America, is the culture of heavily armed White areas.
Older people didn’t do this. Politicians did. We used to call a spade a spade till the younger generation got so offended about everything. But guess what some of US still don’t care about your feelings.
that side is devils spawn
there are black preppers too there are not too many light skinned proud boys….white supremacists ..not really black cuban and mulatto all the ones I have met…west miami dade has more than a few
Once more those in the “Democratic Communist Party” are pushing the “New World Order’s” narrative. Here in Michigan we have ( with the help of unions) Commie Rat Bastards voted into the government, and as a result unconstitutional laws have been passed. The Republicans do nothing but lip service. They talk a good game, but as Mike V. IF NOT NOW, WHEN? would say; When it comes down to the nut cutting, they talk a good game. A game that’s all it is, a game for us the public. Everyone of them, on both side have sold their souls! IF… Read more »
Wop bop bam bam
The microstamping can be damaged or the bad guys will just reload.
They can pickup spent brass from a rival and plant it at a crime scene to frame the rival.
There are already so many “ street” guns in circulation it would take a while for micro stamped ones to hit that market via being stolen from people who follow the law. The stamping would help the government persecute the citizen who was victimized by gun thieves. The micro stamping provision of the Kommiefornia handgun roster was a struck down by a federal judge and the state didn’t appeal that ruling. The KA legislature did, however, introduce yet another bill to require micro stamping starting in 2027. Right now, I believe that a large number of crime guns in NYC… Read more »
Sad. Surprised they didn’t go after Social Security funds as well. Hell, everyone else appears to see that as a potential cash cow for their flashes of brilliance.
IMOA, I’d bet if these anti-gun buffoons would demand criminal control and severe punishment or death penalty for using a gun in the commission of their crimes, we’d see a reduction in gun related injuries or deaths.
The only reason to have firearms enhancements is to criminalize the 2nd Amendment. You are acting like the left when they say it is worse to be stabbed or beaten compared to being shot. Psychologically, because of the closeness to the other person, it takes more of a dangerous person to stab or beat another to death than it does to press a trigger. Why not have weapons enhancements for those weapons? Why doesn’t the government want enhancements on those weapons, because those weapons are not as good as guns, at saying no to the government enforcers. Look at Prohibition,… Read more »