Editors Note: It has been brought to Ammoland’s attention that there have been some delivery issues with this product maker. Buyer beware, Ammoland does not endorse this product or the product maker.
U.S.A. — At the NRA Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, One-Shot Systems was offering pre-orders to the public for the new, improved version of their highly successful, non-attached pistol stabilization system. The product has been in use, particularly in the US military and with law enforcement agencies, for a decade. The improved design is now being offered to the general public. The early versions were built for the Special Forces community. The product has been continuously improved and is now in use at over a hundred agencies, including the Secret Service and U.S. Border Patrol.
The concept of a solid rest to stabilize a pistol, which is not attached to the pistol and, thus, not a firearms part, has been in the gun culture for a very long time. Using a walking stick to stabilize a pistol has been fairly common, even if the stability came from the ground and not the shooter’s shoulder. The idea of a stick, held by the shooter’s hand against the pistol grip, has been considered, on and off, for as long as pistols have existed. An intermediate form is the hip stick. While helpful, these systems do not approach the advantages that accrue while using the one-shot design.
A major advantage of the latest one-shot design is its simplicity. It is a simple, solid, tough piece of special reinforced composite material. No adjustment is necessary. When you grip the pistol and the one-shot, your grip holds them together in a unique way that prevents side-to-side wobble or up-and-down angular rotation between the pistol and the one-shot. The one-shot design only weighs seven ounces. It is eleven inches long. There is no attachment to the pistol. When the user stops gripping the pistol, the one-shot separates automatically. Therefore, it is easy to holster the pistol. Just holster it as you normally would, and the one-shot moves from it. If you have the one-shot in your hand, placing it on the pistol grip as you draw the pistol is said to be almost as quick as a normal draw. With the one-shot, you are drawing the equivalent of a pistol caliber carbine, with all the advantages in accuracy and control.
The simple system has made this correspondent re-think the entire “pistol brace” controversy. The one-shot sidesteps the entire issue. It is not a firearm part. It never attaches to the firearm. It is a sophisticated type of rest, not much different in function from a stick. It is not regulated as a firearm part because it is not a firearm part. This correspondent was told there is no issue in carrying it aboard commercial aircraft in carry-on luggage.
One of the difficulties of using pistols at longer ranges has been the short sight radius. A modern solution is a micro-optical sight. Someone with excellent eyes and good support can hit beer cans at 70 yards with a snub-nosed revolver. I could do it while I was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team in the 1970s. It takes good eyes and solid support. Sight alignment is critical. Modern micro-optical sights eliminate most sighting errors. The one-shot system excels at support to minimize wander and wobble in nearly all situations. The combination produces a system that is the equivalent of a pistol caliber carbine, with significant advantages and slight disadvantages. This means, with most pistol calibers, first-shot hits on man-sized targets out to 150 yards are not difficult. First-shot hits on small game out to 50 yards are not difficult. If you can hit what you are aiming at with an ordinary .22 rifle, you can almost certainly hit it with a pistol equipped with an optical sight and a one-shot. The inherent accuracy of the pistol used limits this. Most modern pistols are surprisingly accurate.
A major advantage is the ability to holster the pistol so as to be free of encumbrances. Another is the extremely compact package which can be brought into play in a couple of seconds without adjustment or set screws.
The minor disadvantage is the one-shot and pistol together are not an effective blunt instrument. They can be used separately. Being a blunt instrument was never a great selling point for shoulder-stocked pistols.
While the one-shot appears to be simple, it represents years of continual improvement and sophisticated features. The contact between the pistol, the one-shot, and the human hand has been refined to work extremely well with many semi-automatic pistols. The part of the one-shot which accepts the slide as it recoils both aids in stability and protects the user’s hand, face, and eye. The variety of slots reduces weight and allows for multiple sling methods of carrying the one-shot for rapid employment. The asymmetrical shape of the contact area increases the stability of the system. The sophisticated composite material is very strong. There are a number of patents on the design.
Unfortunately, the one-shot system’s advance samples were unavailable at the NRA Annual Meeting. The prototypes examined by this correspondent were simple, light, compact, and impressive in their ability to stabilize a pistol into the equivalent of a pistol caliber carbine. This correspondent hopes to test one of the early production models with actual range and field time. The one-shot product can be pre-ordered for $99 at usa1shot.com. The official release date is July 4, 2023.
One-shot is said to have earned its name from people who used earlier versions in the field, and marveled at a pistol’s increased practical accuracy. It is virtually unregulated by any firearms law. Long experience by over a hundred agencies has shown it to be useful and effective.
About Dean Weingarten:
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.
So using a pistol stabilization system that doesn’t attach to your pistol is perfectly legal? How about a “pistol stabilization device” that slips onto a buffer tube that will easily slip off? It is not attached to the pistol.
I just ordered one. I am 80 years old and disabled so this will help me to continue enjoying shooting. I use a single point sling now but this will improve my stability
all the stupid things they are doing now there was a hunter version of desert eagle with a 14 inch barrel that came as 357 ,44, or 440 corbon but they had a nice wood “pistol brace” sold it to a friend who is a bush pilot , tells me if ever he parts with it it will come my way …….he is twenty years younger
“Getting old is not for sissies.” — Bette Davis
Just turned 74 and some mornings I feel every bit of it.
But you know what they say: “Getting old sucks, but it sure beats the alternative!”
I made unattached wire “stocks” like this for my pistols when I was in high school 40 years ago. Even made one for my dad to carry on duty, at a time when HPD were not allowed carbines.
They were great metal shop projects.
Well? What kind of grades did you get for making them in Shop Class? You also may have to explain to the younger Ammolanders what Shop Class actually was.
Interesting. I had considered doing the same thing with a short board and a strip of steel.
Having carried handguns professional and personally for over 5 decades.
I see merit in stabilizing ones handgun. Not all situations require a one second draw to round on target.. Especially in law enforcement where one can have many minutes of response time.
As with many items, practice makes things better.
I would like to try one with one of my dot sighted handguns.
The one little warning I’ll give is, be aware of your hat brim. The stop on top of the device allows plenty of room to protect your face from the slide, but if you’re wearing a hat angled downward, it may be possible for the optic to strike the brim. It doesn’t hurt anything, but it is surprising.
I ordered one and it is fantastic. I am 80 years old and disabled. Using the device I am able to use my Glock pistol and hit a target at 20 yards almost as fast as I can put the trigger.
I love it and recommend it %
I ordered this device 17 Jun 2023. It has finally arrived today 14 Aug 2023. A little over eight weeks! A long story within itself with an exchange of emails and promises not met. I ordered this because I thought it might help with zeroing a few firearms that I have red dot sights mounted. I do not have any intention of this becoming a cumbersome addition to my EDC. After receiving it it is a cheap piece of plastic, BUT, well designed for mostly universal use. I suspect the research and design is mostly what you pay for. I… Read more »
Is “ATF” the disallowed letters?
No. Hmmm. Perhaps “decree”
“destroy”?
ATF decree, perhaps?
OK, I give up trying to figure out what the system objects to, about my earlier post. AI ‘thinking” is sometimes too weird to figure out.
The next thing up to get banned by ATF decree? Buy one now so you can be forced to destroy it tomorrow?
“ It is virtually unregulated by any firearms law. “
Until the GuNazi LibTards and the BATFEces get their panties in a knot about this.
Oh now let’s not get too excited! look out, here comes the ATF to again redefine the definition of a pistol brace!!
I understand the design concept and inventors intent of this gadget, its purpose in providing enhanced stabilization of a handgun. Im skeptical that the bearer can deploy this easily and rapidly in high stress situations. A hundred bucks for two bits of plastic. If Im an LEO or MIL my choice for a PDW wont be an improvised one made of a pistol and this gadget. The manufacturer offers little more than a short video and a testimonial by a Colonel who says: “The ONE-SHOT does for handguns what the seat belt did for automobiles.” So in his words this… Read more »
But still inferior to a regular brace, which is an acceptable if mediocre stock workaround.
I can say from experience, no matter how good you are at shooting a handgun, this will improve your performance at range. In fact, I would say that for most people, the better you are, the more benefit to your accuracy you’ll get, especially if you combine it with a red dot. Even if you’re one of that rare breed who can reliably hit a silhouette at 1000 yards with a handgun, you’ll still find that this device significantly reduces muzzle flip and allows you to get back on target faster. Although it’s not as stable as an actual stock,… Read more »
1000 yards with a pistol, I want to meet that pistol and read recoil stats.. that is 50 bmg territory 100 yards I believe because I can with 44mag. I dont think madi griffin would shoot over 350 yards velocity being on energy transferred dependent . some of the 338 lupa exotics (the break your arm guns) might go further but pistols as a rule no
or he has a ray gun
when you get in to anything past 100 holdover becomes an issue makes repeatability without a scope real iffy reason i have scopes on my desert eagles a hunting gun has to be reliable …pistol or rifle
hail Mary shooting without a scope
for a mile with the 50bmg have a scope mount with 17 degrees and one with 22 when you hold the rifle level scope points at the ground
1,000 yards with a pistol round? Na, that ain’t happening on this planet. Maybe in some fictional movie, but not ballistically possible.
had to be a typo but those give us a laugh , and with fjb in office I can use one
It’s also 3000 feet. Well over half a mile. Just about one kilometer. Without some kind of optical aid, most can’t even SEE a silhoutte at that range, much the less hit it! 🙂
Its utterly useless in CCW and self defense carry where milliseconds count. The claim that its in military and police use is dubious, unless its used in competitions or in situations where one has the luxury of time to dig the gadget out from a ruck or Sam Browne, draw the pistol, grip pistol and gadget together, shoulder, aim and fire.
You obviously know nothing about the product, its history, or its intended use. Why would you need this for a ccw gun for immediate self-defense?
Mike, you are correct. As most gunfights are at about 21 feet. This being the case, if I can’t hit body mass or the head, I shouldn’t be carrying a pistol.
Most gun fights are at arms length away or within the seven yards
3 times 7 is what??????? are we math challenged and if they are a threat and inside 21 feet you should be unloading on them
Agreed. If the target is far enough to need a brace, then the target is most likely far enough to allow time to deploy this brace.
Distance equals time in a defensive situation.
Most people never get in a gun fight. The whole reason we carry guns is to prepare for uncommon emergencies. Your attacker will already have a tremendous unfair advantage simply by virtue of being the attacker. Avail yourself of every possible advantage when preparing for defense.
you are lucky, because good shoot or no you still have the what if dreams pop up years later
Same here. A guy was angling across a parking lot at a large mall towards me, and I shifted my stance and watched him, all the while keeping my peripheral vision aligned with any areas where any of his ‘friends’ might appear, if he had any.
Amazing what just moving your body in preparation for a draw does to a predator who can ‘read the signs.’
The path across the lot abruptly changed to a completely different direction, from getting closer to increasing the distance between us..
Since you seen to know about this gadget, then enlighten us. Tell us all about it.
https://www.ammoland.com/2015/07/usa-1shot-dynamic-pistol-rest/#axzz85OqC36Iu
Sir, please don’t be so hasty to lambast the device.
It would be a very simple process of attaching it to your shoulder by way of a small shoulder sling not much different than like a shoulder holster.
We Americans are very creative in making things work.
Now all we have to do now is see what the ATF has to say
No less useless than a 10.5” AR pistol with a brace or even a Recover style PDW. That is also not a CCW weapon unless maybe under a sport coat. Even then, that’s the domain of security professionals.
If this lightweight plastic could hang under a shoulder under a jacket for relatively quick deployment. Definitely not the average CCW EDC.
The device could be useful in departments that won’t equip officers with carbines if the officer were involved in a stand off situation.
You could walk around town with your gun held at low ready at all times, and someone could still put a bullet in your head before you knew you were being attacked. That’s life. There’s nothing you can do about it, so accept it and move on. Not every self defense scenario comes without warning, however, and the great thing about this system is, if you have time to deploy it, it gives you a significant advantage. If you don’t have time to deploy it, you’re no worse off—you can still use your handgun normally. There is literally no downside… Read more »
Dragging along with you yet ANOTHER piece of equipment, attachment, accessory that you will most likely never use? The whole intended purpose of Conceal Cary is to carry the least amount of signature to any possible threat.
OK, Dean, how much did they pay you to copy their press release and post it here? $99 for 50¢ worth of Chinese cast plastic (maybe a dollar if done in the USA)! And this BS has the audacity to claim “If you have the one-shot in your hand, placing it on the pistol grip as you draw the pistol is said to be almost as quick as a normal draw” — come on — so you are casually walking around with this foot-long hunk of black plastic in your strong hand and you somehow magically draw your pistol without… Read more »