A common gun owner reaction to both Oliver and Bee: If they don’t like it here, why don‘t they go back to where they came from?
Remember the virtue of an armed society. You stopped mass murder and saved lives. Let’s look back a few months and see what you did.
Contrary to the lies told by those who use that incident to discredit “stand your ground” laws, George Zimmerman’s legal defense did not use that argument.
These are, after all, politically-motivated, slickly produced advertisements, as much as the illusionists behind them want us to believe they are “public service announcements.”
The number of concealed handgun permits has soared to over 19.48 million in 2020 & data shows concealed handgun permit holders are extremely law-abiding out-pacing police officers at following the law
They are intending to follow the example of those who provoked the War for Independence by imposing the Intolerable Acts.
There has to be room in the “Big Tent” for principled standard-bearers who caution us when we stray from core principles. I’d argue they should all be.
Let that sink in. More than 18.66 million Americans hold a permit to lawfully carry a concealed firearm to protect themselves and their loved ones.
… it would seem the only thing left would be to ban gun ownership.
For years after Adam Lankford’s study was released to the media in 2015, the New York Times and Washington Post regularly cited his flawed claims and biased data.
The real agenda of the event, which was to create the false impression that an unprecedented wave of firearm-related violence urgently demands an infusion of federal research dollars.
Professor Jon Lott commented that gun owners don’t seem to care about their gun rights as much as they use to. Is that true?
Why cannot liberals tell the truth? We saw it in the Kavanaugh hearings and now we are seeing a blatant example in a recent bogus mass shooting research paper by Adam Lankford.
…that will help to ensure that the information young people get on guns overwhelmingly comes to them from sources intent on undermining the right to keep and bear arms…
One question emerging from the debate over the Lankford and Lott studies on mass shootings: How exactly do you define a mass shooting?
Lankford’s study reported that from 1966 to 2012, there were 90 public mass shooters in the U.S. & 202 in the rest of world. Lankford’s data represent a gross undercount of foreign attacks.
Who thinks the Bloods, the Crips, the Latin Kings, MS-13, Vatos Locos, the 18th Street Gang and all the others will have their activities curtailed in the slightest?
In the twenty years that I have discussed guns in the media, I don’t believe that I have seen such media bias.
When the government abuses its tremendous power to scapegoat someone, even proponents of government power find it to be too much.
The gun-grabbers want everyone to vote because of a Democrat advantage with the foreign born, but they don’t want citizens to own guns.