Today is Friday, July 25, 2014rss RSS feed
Sunnyvale, Calififornia

NRA Files Suit against Sunnyvale, Calif., Over Magazine Ban



Charlotte, NC --(  On December 16,, 2013, counsel for NRA brought a suit against the city of Sunnyvale, Calif., to invalidate the city’s recently enacted ordinance banning standard-capacity firearm magazines.

The complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief was filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of several law-abiding gun owners, and argues that the new law violates the plaintiffs’ right to keep and bear arms as protected by the Second Amendment.

The offending ordinance was part of a package of gun controls that appeared as an inaccurately labeled “gun safety” ballot measure, for the city’s November 5, 2013, election. Residents were asked, “Shall the City of Sunnyvale adopt a gun safety ordinance to require: 1) reporting to police, within 48 hours, known loss or theft of a firearm; 2) storing firearms in residences in a locked container or disabling them with a trigger lock when not in the owner’s immediate possession; 3) prohibiting the possession of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, with certain exceptions; and 4) logging and tracking of ammunition sales within the City of Sunnyvale?” The measure passed, with two thirds voting in favor.

The magazine ordinance consists of a total civilian ban on “ammunition feeding devices” with a capacity greater than 10, requiring that residents remove any such magazines from the city, sell them to a gun dealer, or allow them to be confiscated by law enforcement within 90 days of the law’s effective date of December 6, 2013. A separate suit has been filed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County challenging the city’s new ammunition sales regulations.

The NRA-supported complaint argues that access to the types of magazines the ordinance prohibits is protected under the Second Amendment. The complaint notes that in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, the court found that the Second Amendment protects “arms ‘typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes’ or those ‘in common use.’” The complaint goes on to describe at length the popularity of the magazines the ordinance bans, noting that millions of such magazines are owned by millions of Americans. Further, the complaint explains that such magazines are often used to further the “central component” of the Second Amendment right, self-defense.

The ramifications of this important case could reach far beyond the borders of Sunnyvale. Speaking with the San Jose Mercury News, NRA counsel Chuck Michel noted, “There’s an epic legal battle for the future of the Second Amendment going on across the nation right now, and Sunnyvale, by passing this ordinance, jumped right into the middle of the fray.”  Michel added that the case “really is, in many ways, perfect for Supreme Court review.” Reiterating the importance of the case, the Washington Post reported Michel as stating that the case could “go straight up to the Supreme Court and be there in a matter of months rather than a matter of years.”

Whatever happens next, NRA will, of course, keep its members apprised of major developments.

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit:

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • One User comment to “NRA Files Suit against Sunnyvale, Calif., Over Magazine Ban”

    1. law in the united states isn’t based on the constitution its based on what political hack appointed the political hack judge. its best to ignore any ruling where the constitution is spit upon. remember it’s legal to kill 1,500,000 unborn children every year but you better watch what kind of gun you have to protect yourself from knock out punks, rapist, etc cause there are technicalities involved and you life doesn’t matter. you know HW Bush appointed this Covello communist and Sueter as-well. HW Bush also said no new taxes and he then proceeded to raise taxes. The pathetice Bush was replace by Bill Clinton. This is one of only a few cases where a democrat is better than a rhino republican. I believe HW Bush might just suck the big one.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • TEX: The tyrannists will hate this story ! They would had preferred the bad guy kill as many as possible. I just hope...
      • Dave Francis: AMERICA WON’T WELCOME ILLEGALS WITHOUT A FIGHT RED FLAG ALERT: Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Jeff...
      • Dr Dave: @Gen Early that IS the Calif preference. They would absolutely like to outlaw guns and ammo all together but...
      • Smitty6398: It apparently seemed clear enough to the jury to come to a UNANIMOUS DECISION of “not guilty”...
      • PeterC: Screw Nevada; they won’t recognize my AZ concealed carry permit.
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Daniel Defense DDM4v9 Rifle

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be August 15, 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Daniel Defense DDM4v9 Rifle. For more information visit the Daniel Defense promotional page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland