Today is Sunday, April 20, 2014rss RSS feed

This is another nail in the coffin for States like New Jersey and Maryland that require “Justifiable Need” as a condition of getting CCW permits.

Justifiable Need

Federal Court Says ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Conceal-Carry Permits Violates the Second Amendment

AmmoLand Gun News

AmmoLand Gun News

Manasquan, NJ --(Ammoland.com)- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit handed gun rights advocates a major victory today by invalidating San Diego, California’s requirement that conceal-carry permits only be issued to those gun owners who have a “good cause” to carry a concealed gun in public.

According to local officials, “one’s personal safety is not considered good cause.” In his opinion for a divided three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit, Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain rejected the local government’s approach as an unconstitutional infringement on the Second Amendment.

“In California,” the ruling observes, “the only way that the typical responsible, law-abiding citizen can carry a weapon in public for the lawful purpose of self-defense is with a concealed-carry permit. And, in San Diego County, that option has been taken off the table.”

As Brian Doherty noted on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court is currently considering whether it will take up two other cases that also center on the Second Amendment’s reach outside of the home.

This new ruling from the 9th Circuit makes it all the more likely that the question of gun rights in public will soon be addressed by the Supreme Court.

Today’s ruling by the 9th Circuit in Peruta v. County of San Diego is available here. http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/02/12/1056971.pdf

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 3 User comments to “Federal Court Says ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Conceal-Carry Permits Violates the Second Amendment”

    1. Not just New Jersey and Maryland, but New York as well.

    2. Kevin McGonigal on February 14, 2014 at 11:29 AM said:

      Do I have to show a the state good reason to vote, to marry, to surf the net, obtain an attorney, publish a blog, go to a church? If I do I have lost the right.

    3. A good cause? How about for self protection! What gives these government shills the right to say who can and cannot have the right to self protection?

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Richard Kinzell: I just bought a Remington 700 compact for my wife seven days before the recall notice. I have made...
      • Soylent Greenie: pure Agenda 21 bs what a tangled web partnership= nobody accountable, skew the lines, overlay the...
      • Dick Hughes: I had the Mossberg 500 or 590 in mind until I saw the Saiga. I like the idea of the semi-auto clip to...
      • SteveN: The only viable argument that I have read here is the issue of trying to make Bundy pay back taxes on the...
      • Janek: Hope more people come to their senses in the “Land of Lautenberg”.
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Sign up for the Ammoland Daily Digest

    * indicates required
    Daily Digest is a daily recap of Firearms industry news, 2nd Amendment politics , and product articles delivered to the inbox. Stay informed to keep your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
    Yes, I want the Monthly email newsletter subscription to Ammoland so I can get a single newsletter once a month on the hot new products from the Firearms Industry!
    8846664
    9346680