‘Progressives’ Join Bloomberg in Challenging Fitness of Blacks to Own Guns

By David Codrea

ScreenHunter_05 Mar. 07 17.43
Who thinks the Deacons would have agreed with privileged “progressives” that guns should have been a lot harder for them to get? (The University of North Carolina Press)
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

USA –  -(Ammoland.com)- “These horrifying new numbers show how America’s lax gun laws hurt black Americans,” a Violence Policy Center-inspired screed against gun rights on Vox claims.

“[T]he black homicide rate … was 16.91 per 100,000 people. In comparison, the overall national homicide rate was 4.27 per 100,000 and the white homicide rate was 2.54 per 100,000. This includes all homicides, not just gun deaths.”

Why not break it down further? And what’s with white homicide rates being lower than those of many countries that have enacted restrictive “gun controls”?

That would seem to indicate that the issue isn’t “lax gun laws,” at all, as the majority segment of the population behaves remarkably peaceably around all those guns. The implication is what Michael Bloomberg articulated a few years back, when he advocated for cities to enact special race-based disarmament edicts aimed at “minority” males up to age 25.

Curiously, the usual payoff-seeking race hustlers didn’t make a public squall over that, and the media, generally quick to vent outrage when “progressive” sacred cows are questioned, conveniently kept a lid on things for Bloomberg. Vox doesn’t make the same miscalculation here – their premise seems to be since some people can’t be trusted with guns, none of us can be.

The transition from pockets of predation to making sweeping indictments against the Republic as a whole can be seen in the lame attempt to compare U.S. gun ownership rates against gun-related deaths around the world. Now all of a sudden it’s in their interests to add segregated whites back into the mix.

The first bit of conflation is the use of the word “ownership,” both a legal and a moral concept. Criminals don’t “own” property obtained through violent or thieving actions, and there can be a world of usage differences between things that are owned and things that are possessed.

The other trick is to use a manipulated term like “developed” or “industrialized” to exclude from the discussion countries that don’t support a premise.  Note the chart (and the video) Vox uses to make its case.  Anybody see Russia or Mexico listed, both with more restrictive gun laws and higher violent crime than the U.S.?

Whether one consults the UN, the IMF, the World Bank or the CIA Factbook, Mexico has a larger GDP than many of the nations that qualify as “developed” when it suits gun-grabber purposes. Also rated above many countries in term of “economic complexity,” Mexico includes cars, computers, video displays and delivery trucks among its top exports. It boasts a literacy rate of 93.4 percent.

And somebody had better tell Vladimir Putin that Third World jerkwater he rules over has no business exporting rocket engines to the U.S. While they’re at it, they should let Gabby Gifford’s brother-in-law Scott Kelly know he just spent the last year risking his life in orbit with a pair of crude, Vodka-swilling peasants.

In fairness, Vox offers some “progressive” (Opposite Day) alternatives if Americans won’t listen to them and their VPC talking point providers on guns. For starters, they want to resurrect forms of alcohol prohibition (and stimulate the bootleg market!) with higher taxes, fewer points of legal sale, and Orwellian monitoring of “prohibited persons.”

They want a permanent police occupation in high minority areas. They want to force more participation in indoctrination programs. They want even more dependency on government housing, paid for by productive members of society who are somehow able to cope with “lax gun laws” all the while resisting the urge to victimize others.

In short, like typical control freak “progressives” they want to ratchet up government control of all aspects of life and ignore the incontrovertible evidence that they’re just piling more of the same destructive interference and subsidization of poor choices that has led to today’s inexcusable state of affairs.

Look at where the homicide is the highest. They’re Democrat-controlled Bloomberg coalition zones.

It’s ultimately not a racism issue. Civil rights/EEO laws have been around for the lifetime of most of the population. Barack Obama was elected with millions of white voters coming together to affirm their belief that race should not matter – and yet it seems the country is reaching new levels of polarization, as those with collectivist agendas gin up and exploit hostilities.

It’s not about “poverty,” despite that excuse being so universally unchallenged.  Look at the multitude of municipal, country, state and federal welfare programs and then look back to when there was true widespread poverty and virtually no comprehensive safety nets, as in the Great Depression. Sure, there were public works programs then, but nothing as comprehensive as today, and the operative word was “work.” Many of our parents and grandparents managed to emerge from that with their values, ethics and esteem for personal responsibility, hard work and education intact. And they did it without “free” phones, housing, utilities, nutrition programs, EBT cards, medical care, child care, internet service and $200 athletic shoes.

By the way – everybody who doesn’t know how babies are made, raise your hand. That’s enabled, too.

It’s not lack of funding for urban education, either. But fat cat union officials, bloated public school administrators and social indoctrination engineers who flush away billions are also part of the Democrat/”progressive” machine. The young minds who, in spite of that, emerge from the other end of that mill with mastery of the basics (and some even who manage to excel) do so through individual achievement and family expectations and standards, not because of collectivist central planning bureaucrats.

That Vox is pushing a statist subjugation agenda instead of any true solutions is hardly a surprise. Like all “progressive” endeavors, the obsession is to control everything, including what its readers should think about the news.

A truism some don’t like, but are still unable to refute, is that anyone who can’t be trusted with a gun can’t be trusted without a custodian. Alternatively, those who do not commit intolerable (victimizing) acts are entitled to the birthrights of free people. Skin color has nothing to do with that – conduct does.

Curiously, the ones who, have the biggest problem with the uninfringed right of the people to keep and bear arms, the ones who object the loudest to true power sharing, are the same ones passing themselves off as egalitarians. Unsurprisingly – and to show how “regressive” those who would impose their rules on the rest of us truly are – the “solutions” they offer reject freedom, and trace back to the “racist roots of gun control.”


David Codrea in his natural habitat.

About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and also posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

  • 12 thoughts on “‘Progressives’ Join Bloomberg in Challenging Fitness of Blacks to Own Guns

    1. Once Bloomberg and his toadies manage to take all the guns from the untrustworthy “Coloreds”, all us rednecks are next. Equality under the law, you know. The elites will, of course, be exempted because they can afford justice.
      [W3]

    2. It sure makes the SJW race hustler types who obsess over american racism upset to learn that they favor racist jim crow laws. The pistol permit permission system from the sheriff is literally a Jim Crow law that the leftist gun banners all favor.

    3. That Israeli won’t touch our ‘redneck’ guns ! Not sounding racist (everything racist these days) but I wouldn’t feel comfortable around blacks with guns at all ! Not many of them can legal own them anyways. Again I ain’t sounding racists at all…just truth !

      1. I was around them for thirty two years. They had the same M-16, M-60, LAW, SAW, 45 or 9mm that I had. Never had a problem. I know that this is merely anecdotal evidence, but I’m convinced that they are no more dangerous than anyone else. What I look for is the statement that people make with their dress, grooming, movements, and speech as clues to their intent and frame of mind.
        Come on Tex you don’t really believe that. Have your coffee and a couple of aspirin and you’ll feel less scratchy.

    4. gun control laws dont work in their cities, what makes them think gun control laws will work in ours?, since crime is so much lower in our cities, perhaps they should consider what we are doing instead of forcing us to do what their doing

    5. How about creating employment opportunities for all these people on welfare, no matter what their skin color. Anyone capable of working will show up for work on Monday, period. We the People are paying these people, so why shouldn’t they show up for work for the community every day of the week? If they are going on an honest JOB interview, they are excused for that period of time. Otherwise, they can pick up trash, cut grass etc. Don’t show up, NO EBT card! Simple solution..

      Welfare should be an “assist” while getting a job. NOT a lifestyle! If they get a job, continue to work with them for health insurance until they can actually pay for it themselves. Don’t cut the medical just because they went to work.

    6. Bloomie’s racist selective disarmament law reminds me of anther former New York City mayor’s powerful antigun laws. Not even he tried the racist card Bllomie is playing, but he left the selective enforcement of his new law to “his Boys”. I believe the time waas 1911, Mayor Sullivan of NYC railroaded some tough anti-gun laws…. no one could have them, except that “his Boys” could and did because THEY were the “good guys” and the police left them alone whenver they were “caught” with guns. His rivals, on the other hand, were heavily prosecuted when found “in possession”. Not racist when printed on the paper but certainly racist on the streets.

      Bloomie should take some cues from his predecessor. Of course, HE wants all of US to be disarmed,,,, then he ahd “his Boys” will be “the Only Ones”. When his due catches up to him I will not cry… oh wait, I may well cry a few tears of joy that an unelected unapointed unaccountable tyrant has gone the way of all flesh…..

    7. Just another stupid Bloomism. Just another Zionist Elite trying to disarm American so their WWII use the Jews as a tool process can repeat itself.

    8. 5War

      I thought you were making a joke – no one could possibly pack so much ignorance in just a few words the way you have.
      Bloomberg is a rich , self centered , self/ satisfied narcissist with a messiah complex. His Jewish genetics have nothing to do with his anti-Liberty beliefs. And they are merely genetics, I’ll wager he hasn’t been to a service or prayed to G-d for years – maybe never. Bloombergs traits are shared by many from Hilary Clinton and Joe Biden , Nancy Pelosi and Bernie Sanders to Al Gote, and Chris Christie, John Kerry and Donald Trump, Al Sharpton and Barack Obama. The list goes on.

      You need to fulminate at the communist statists of every stripe rather than engaging in ad hominem hand racist broad brush attacks on people based on your prejudices.
      I’ll pray that you will be healed of your hatred and be motivated to stand up with free men and women , regardless of their ethnic heritage, against anyone who would undermine America’s “First Freedom”.

    9. Talk about bringing up a “sticky” point!
      First let me say that I’ve known Black CCW permit holders over the years, and am more than fine with them carrying every day.
      It’s also worth pointing out that virtually all early gun control laws in the U.S. started life as, to some degree, an effort to limit access to firearms to minorities. In fact, it you consider that the cities with the strictest gun control laws today almost always have majority black/minority populations, perhaps it can be argued that this is still true.
      Having said this, I was shocked to learn that our Black population accounts for the vast majority of gun involved violence. Even our large Latino population accounts to a small percentage of gun involved violence by comparison.
      Certainly ii’s outrageous in this day and age to even mention the notion of totally disarming our Black Citizens, still, it must be pointed out that doing that would cut gun involved violence in the U.S. by two thirds.
      I myself have been the intended victim of violent criminals on three occasions. I was robbed at gun point, hit in the head and mugged, and there was an attempted robbery at gun point. In all three instances, young Black Men were the perpetrators.
      I have to admit that I feel more conflicted about this issue as I feel about anything.

    10. “the usual payoff-seeking race hustlers” is the article referring to NRA? NRA state lobbyist Todd Vandermyde put Duty to Inform w/ criminal penalties in Rep. Brandon Phelps HB183 “NRA backed” carry bill in 2013. The anti-gun Chiefs of Police wanted legal cover to shoot down a few blacks to thin out the herd around Chicago. Phelps and the racist hicks gave the cops what they wanted: Duty to Inform, Klan law updated for the 21st century.

      If you’re a white good old boy who lives in Harrisburg with Phelps, the cops will invite you to a barbecue if you carry. If you’re black and live in Cook County, don’t make a fast move. The cops can shoot you down and say you pulled first. DTI is criminal if you’re black. NRA made $1.3 MILLION on legal fees after they flushed Otis McDonald down the toilet. Todd Vandermyde, Brandon Phelps, & NRA: Race Hustlers for the 2nd Amendment!

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *