African Americans Roiling Over, Only Police Should Have Guns..?

By Jeff Knox

Armed African Americans, primarily veterans of Korea and WWII, successfully defended themselves, their families, churches, communities, and the non-violent civil rights movement.
Armed African Americans, primarily veterans of Korea and WWII, successfully defended themselves, their families, churches, communities, and the non-violent civil rights movement.

FirearmsCoalition.org

Buckeye, AZ –-(Ammoland.com)- Humans are complicated and confusing creatures.

We often cling to misguided beliefs and self-destructive philosophies, even as we decry the impacts and results of those beliefs and philosophies.

One of the most confusing examples of this is when a minority that has suffered oppression and abuse advocates for policies that enable that abuse and remove options for protecting against future abuse.

The right to arms has long been recognized as a core distinction between a citizen and a subject, a free man and a slave.

Virtually all gun control laws in the U.S. prior to the 1970s were aimed primarily at Blacks, first in fear of slave rebellions, then in fear of retribution from freed slaves, then in fear of “Black crime.” California’s ban on open carry of long guns was a direct result of members of the Black Panther Party legally carrying guns out on the streets and actually into the State Capitol. The Ku Klux Klan, which was a recognized political force in the 1920s and ‘30s, helped pass gun control laws in several states as a way of keeping Blacks defenseless.

Many of those laws remain on the books today, including in North Carolina where a bill to repeal a Jim Crow-era Purchase Permit law fell to heavy-handed political maneuvering this year.

For decades African Americans struggled for the unencumbered right to arms. It was one of the core liberties identified in the early days of the civil rights movement, and was one of the central objectives of the NAACP. The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. preached pacifism and non-violence as a tactic for advancing the cause of equality, but he did so surrounded by armed men prepared to defend him and his followers. The Deacons for Defense and Justice not only guarded Black leaders, Black churches, and Black neighborhoods, they represented an ominous shadow in the background behind Dr. King. Though they maintained a strictly defensive posture, many political leaders new about the Deacons, and they feared what would happen if the civil rights movement ever shifted from Dr. king’s doctrine of non-violence to the Deacons’ philosophy of armed resistance.

Whites were more willing to negotiate with Dr. King in order to avoid having to negotiate with men like the Deacons.

That possibility began to rear its head in the late 1960s with the growth of the more militant Black Panther Party for Self-Defense. Initially focused on police brutality against Blacks, and a high incidence of police shooting of Black suspects, the BPP’s primary activity was openly armed patrols through Black neighborhoods to “police the police.” Many credit the activity with reducing racially biased police activities, and crime in general, but soon the hostility between members of the BPP and police boiled over into active warfare. The FBI engaged in a campaign to undermine the group, and their militant socialist and separatist philosophy fueled the public’s fear, contributing to new firearms and carry restrictions in several states, and passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968.

Former NRA Board Member Roy Innis
Former NRA Board Member Roy Innis

And it wasn’t just White folks who were frightened. During that same period, the ‘right to arms plank’ began disappearing from the platforms of civil rights organizations. Younger, more politically ambitious leaders like Jesse Jackson stopped talking about securing the right to arms for Black citizens, and instead became outspoken proponents of restricting firearms as a means of reducing the problem of “Black-on-Black” crime in urban areas.

Of all of the major groups of the time, only CORE, the Congress of Racial Equality, led by Roy Innis of Harlem, maintained support for Second Amendment rights. Mr. Innis lost two sons to street violence and has strongly advocated for the right to self-defense.

He has served for many years on the Board of Directors of the NRA.

So with America’s gun control laws founded in racism, African American communities roiling over racially-motivated police brutality and unjustified shootings of blacks, inner-city crime back on the rise, and a heinous, racially-motivated attack on a Bible study group in Charleston,,,

the response from Black leaders and America’s first Black president, is a call for more restrictions on firearms.

As Dr. Phil might say, “How’s that been working for you so far?”

Why on earth would a group of people who feel they are being oppressed and targeted by government agents – not to mention hate groups and street criminals – advocate for only government agents (and criminals) being armed? It makes no rational sense.

Yet African Americans aren’t the only oppressed minority that has taken this tack.

American Jews, whose families were slaughtered in the Holocaust after being disarmed by Hitler in the years leading up to the war, have long been in the vanguard of citizen disarmament movement.

Like Roy Innis and CORE, there are exceptions to the disarmament philosophy among Jewish groups, the most prominent being Jews for the Preservation of Firearm Ownership, or JPFO. Unlike CORE, JPFO’s only mission is opposition to firearm restrictions, and they pull no punches in their efforts. Among their signature achievements are a series of award-winning documentaries on the roots and results of gun control laws, including “Innocents Betrayed, No Guns for Jews,” (video below) and No Guns for Negroes, which are available for viewing on YouTube or DVDs can be purchased at JPFO.org.

A generation or two ago African Americans were risking their lives to acquire guns to defend their families and communities from night-riders and corrupt sheriffs. Today as their grandchildren face similar threats and predation, instead of empowering their communities with the means for self-defense, they are advocating that only the police (and criminals) be armed.

Again raising the question – how’s that working for you so far?

About:

The Firearms Coalition is a loose-knit coalition of individual Second Amendment activists, clubs and civil rights organizations. Founded by Neal Knox in 1984, the organization provides support to grassroots activists in the form of education, analysis of current issues, and with a historical perspective of the gun rights movement. The Firearms Coalition is a project of Neal Knox Associates, Manassas, VA. Visit: www.FirearmsCoalition.org

  • 3 thoughts on “African Americans Roiling Over, Only Police Should Have Guns..?

    1. I recently hosted 3 black young men in my home who were from lower NY state and going to college in my state. I have known one of those young men and his family since he was a baby. I spoke with them about firearms since they were moving to a state that would allow them to conceal carry almost everywhere, including public universities when they turned 21. After I let them see one of my firearms, I could tell that hadn’t been personally exposed to firearms. I asked them why they didn’t know anybody that had a gun, and they responded that where they come from, only the bad guys had guns. So if you had a gun you were considered a bad guy. Here’s hoping they stay out of NY from now on.

    2. Why do you keep capitalizing “Black”? Black is a color, not an ethnicity. We don’t capitalize “white”, do we?
      That is (rightly) perceived as pandering to blacks to atone for being white.
      Stop it.

    3. I don’t understand why blacks are so against legally carrying a firearm. Most of the gun laws of the past were created to keep firearms out of our hands. Check the history of gun laws. It’s a right that’s afforded to all. Why pick and choose what we should have or have not. It angers me when I see people who have cried about not having equality then giving up rights. The people that are against the right of the people protecting themselves are not helping. The lawsuit in Chicago is a farce. Wake up people. I’m a veteran of the Desert Storm era,the son of Vietnam veteran & father of veteran daughter. We served to protect the rights of the American. Let’s keep them.

    Comments are closed.