Harvey Weinstein Won’t Be Keeping Promise to Make NRA Members Regret Being Alive

By David Codrea

Opposite Day “progressive feminists” Clinton and Weinstein…
David Codrea in his natural habitat.

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- “So Michelle Obama speaks out against women in the @GOP, but won’t stand up for the women assaulted by Weinstein?” Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel asked in a Tuesday tweet. She was sharing a link to a CNN report that uncharacteristically appeared to be pointing out major hypocrisy by both the Obamas and the Clintons, self-styled feminist political champions, for staying silent on a major fundraiser’s longstanding serial sexual abuse of women.

Does she deserve that even if the assailant is Hillary’s husband? And does she deserve to be able to defend herself against that attacker with a gun?

True, Hillary has since boarded the condemnation train with self-serving declarations intended to distance what had been a warm and long-term relationship of mutual interests. But she waited five days.

Everybody remembers the outrage over Donald Trump not responding to Charlottesville quickly enough to satisfy opportunistic “progressive” indignation?

And Clinton has also never been pressed by supportive media for a simple “Yes” or “No” to a basic related question:

“Is Juanita Broaddrick a liar?”

Plenty of celebrities are also signaling how offended they are now that there’s blood in the water and the man at whose feet they once knelt and (use your imagination) has been brought down by his perverse pathological hubris. It’s fair to ask what took them so long, too, and not just to react to recent breaking developments.

Where were they when Harvey made the news two years ago, when cops set up a phone sting and he didn’t deny groping 22-year-old Italian model Ambra Battilana? And what’s with the report about A-listers Matt Damon and Russell Crowe helping to spike an expose 10 years before that at The New York Times? (Damon is the “action hero” who called for confiscation of guns.)

But now, everybody’s shocked, shocked that such conduct goes on in Hollywood? And has since the early days?  Nobody remembers Fatty Arbuckle? Or heard the term “casting couch”? Or remembers what Marilyn Monroe reputedly said (NSFW/vulgarity) after signing her first major contract? Or knows what goes on at those “social gatherings” the salacious media reports on? Or suspects (or has participated in) darker deeds?

Weinstein’s wife can’t claim to be surprised by her #wonderfulhusband either, despite the crocodile tears that “My heart breaks for all the women who have suffered tremendous pain because of these unforgivable actions.” At least she’s bailing before the bank breaks.

And Harvey?

He’s out. He may be facing criminal charges for rape. So predictably, he’s pulling a Weiner and going into “rehab” (and coincidentally escaping U.S. jurisdiction?)

Painting from the movie “Harvey” repurposed: Looks like the threatened anti-gun group grope is all in their imaginations now…

So he won’t be making good on his threat to make an anti-NRA movie starring Meryl Streep (who also had no idea!). Here’s what Harvey told Howard Stern in January, 2014:

“They are going to wish they weren’t alive after I’m done with them … I don’t think we need guns in this country, and I hate it.”

Curiously, he didn’t say if that hatred translated into disarming the bodyguards he hired because he was afraid of … uh … Scientologists. And that was “extra security” as “Weinstein had already been under close guard following a recent attempt to blackmail him.”

In fairness, it’s not like he was going to make the movie anyway. Every so often I’d check in on its progress, and it’s still where it’s been since Harvey first opened his mouth. The project has been listed as “in development,” with no other production data, on both IMDB and Movie Insider for over three years now.

If the rape charges stick, Harvey will be a “prohibited person,” forbidden by law to own a gun. Isn‘t it curious how many narcissists, exhibitionists and outright psychopaths, who can’t – or more likely won’t – control themselves, are so obsessed with controlling those of us who don’t share in their degeneracy and their moral defects?

Any gun owners seeing him implode wish they weren't alive…?

About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

  • 13 thoughts on “Harvey Weinstein Won’t Be Keeping Promise to Make NRA Members Regret Being Alive

    1. These sociopathic sexual predators like harvey weinstein support gun control because they want their victims disarmed. This is the same reason that burglars, robbers, thieves, pedophiles, child molestors, murderers, government tyrants, communists, nazis, etc all want disarmed victims – they can’t fight back! Remember how many members of bloombergs gun banning mayoral group were arrested for assaulting people sexually, including a number of underage victims?

      1. There is also the transference theory. The dedicated gun grabber is the individual that would shoot someone over a parking space. They cant rectify this in their conscious mind, so they transfer these feelings of hostility to others and want others disarmed and unable to defend themselves. People like weinstine should not be in public without a custodian. From the looks of things he is going to be removed from society and will not need a custodian.

    2. All Weinstein has to do is shout “But…..but….The Holocaust!!!” and hide behind it as if it were a shield and also claim “antisemitism” and the goyim will let him be.

      1. Ain’t that the truth. Anne Frank has got more attention than the tens of millions murdered by Stalin. Goyim just don’t count and couldn’t possibly be victims.


    4. “Plenty of celebrities are also signaling how offended they are now that there’s blood in the water and the man at whose feet they once knelt and (use your imagination). . . .”

      Your article may be 100% correct but using comments like “use your imagination” as a joke to insinuate that women were forced to give oral sex to this ass-hole for a job cause you to loose all credibility. It is my guess that women of all political ideologies were expected to perform all sorts of horrible acts in order to obtain a job from this jerk. Your making a joke out of it shows that you are as out of touch with reality as those whom you criticize.

      1. @David S, I thought that Ammoland meant worshiped. “… the man at whose feet they once knelt and… ” worshiped. I put my imagination to it and knew they meant “worship”, as in hollywood worshiped him as a false idol! Funny how your imagination came up with something else entirely. Seems to say a lot about individual imagination, doesn’t it.

    5. Good article, the switching beds in hollywood has been prevalent for many, many years and they act shocked. They are just playing another role because there is no morals in the film industry. All these women know what they are in for when they apply for a role. They have to give a little to be able to be chosen for a part. Afterall, you have to have enough income for living expenses and food. I don’t buy the shock from some of these @ssholes, they all know what makes their little world click. This may bring them down off their pedestal and they may feel less apt to run their mouths about things they know nothing about, for instance gun control. Loosers.

    6. Hillary give back ill gotten gains…who do you think you’re kidding!!!!

      Besides, she was use to being with a serial rapist and rampant sexual predator…nothing new to her there.

    7. Probably because Michael errrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Michelle has probably assaulted a few women in the past with “her” not always hidden very well member … And marrying a known gay guy named Barrack was the icing on her cake or would that be on his buns ???
      Libs/Dems protect and cover their own (Bill Clinton, Hillary, Obama and his manwife Michelle, and on and on) while doing the nonstop media blitz on any conservative/Republican. I think this is going to change here soon, the mouthy, arrogant Hollywood puppets strings are about to be cut…

    Leave a Comment 13 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *