Disconnected World Views at NRA Annual Meeting in Dallas 2018

A group of open carriers that were counter-protesting those protesting the NRA.
A group of open carriers that were counter-protesting those protesting the NRA.

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- At the NRA annual meeting in Dallas, Texas, in 2018, protests were held outside the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center on Saturday, 5 May, 2018.  By the time I arrived at the protest site, the main group of gun control supporters had left. I was told they numbered about 200-250 people.

Their numbers were dwarfed by the attendees at the NRA annual meeting. An estimate for meeting attendance was not available at the time of this writing. The last NRA annual meeting, in Atlanta, was 81,836. In 2016, in Louisville, it was 80,452. 87,154  has been reported for attendance at the 2018 meeting.

When I arrived at the protest site outside, the action was centered around a group of open carriers that were counter-protesting those protesting the NRA. The counter-protesters numbered about a hundred. There were a few anti-NRA protesters left. About 5-10 of them gradually came over to the open carry counter-protest.

Those who want more legal restrictions on guns equate the absence of guns with safety.
Those who want more legal restrictions on guns equate the absence of guns with safety.

The two worldviews illustrated by the signs seemed completely disconnected.

Open carriers, and Second Amendment supporters, equate the possession of guns to safety.

Those who want more legal restrictions on guns equate the absence of guns with safety.

Both views make sense from the viewpoint of those putting them forward.

If you choose to be unarmed, anyone who possesses a gun holds a power advantage over you. It is understandable that unarmed people would want everyone else be unarmed.  It is not easy for people who are unarmed to disarm people who have weapons.

If you are armed, those who desire to disarm you are a threat. Police are taught to never surrender their weapons.

Machiavelli put it succinctly, speaking of leaders, in the Prince:

Because there is nothing proportionate between the armed and the unarmed; and it is not reasonable that he who is armed should yield obedience willingly to him who is unarmed, or that the unarmed man should be secure among armed servants. Because, there being in the one disdain and in the other suspicion, it is not possible for them to work well together.

In the United States, police and the military are supposed to be servants of the people.

I talked to police assigned to the event. They said the two groups were peaceful, with no shouting or boisterous behavior.  The behavior I observed was peaceful and polite.

Choosing to be unarmed is closely correlated with choosing to be ignorant about arms. Learning about arms, their use, their history, their proper employment, tactics, and legislation all take time and energy. The willingness and desire to be armed requires a certain self-discipline. Those who have chosen to be unarmed do so, in part, because they are unwilling to expend the time and energy to be armed.

In the armed camp, the members have made the choice to be armed. They have already invested the time and energy to learn about arms, tactics, history, and the legal consequences. Military veterans and retired police both have extraordinary percentages of members who are armed.

The two worldviews are different approaches to the same reality. Both recognize that being armed makes an individual more powerful. Those who want others disarmed fear the power of armed people. Those who have chosen to be armed fear being disarmed and losing the power they have.

It is a false choice to choose between a disarmed society and an armed society. There are no disarmed societies. There are only societies in which more or less people are armed. In the United States, because of the Second Amendment, almost everyone who wishes to be armed can be.

In Australia, even though legal gun owners only represent a few percent of the population, the police and military are armed with the latest weaponry. Every police officer I saw there was armed with a Glock semi-automatic pistol. In Japan, police and the military are routinely armed. Similarly, violent criminals usually have access to arms through criminal channels.

If the access to firearms is tightly restricted, then criminals can rely on impact weapons, the power of muscle, size, numbers, and youth, against all smaller, weaker, older, and outnumbered victims.

The number of firearms in society has little to do with the number of criminal homicides, and suicides in that society. Societies with few and many firearms have both high and low suicides and criminal homicides.

Those who do not wish to be armed have removed themselves from any danger of suicide by firearm, and from almost all danger of firearm accidents.

They want to remove the choice of being armed from other people. It is a false choice.

If you have chosen to be unarmed, if you are ignorant of arms, if you believe governments are always beneficent… it makes sense.

Or, if you are armed, and believe only other people will be disarmed, that the government would never disarm you… it also makes sense.

You see those core beliefs displayed by those who argue for a disarmed society.

©2018 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch


About Dean Weingarten:Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 8 thoughts on “Disconnected World Views at NRA Annual Meeting in Dallas 2018

    1. Where was piggy Hogg. He is the poster boy for the anti-gun bunch. Maybe his daddy wouldn’t let him ride his bicycle all the way commiefornia to Texas. Yes, know he got his start in Fla. but he is a commieflake through and through.
      There were people there carrying those scary guns and he couldn’t stand the thought of having to look at them, or afraid if he opened his trap someone might shut it for him. Remember, shoot and shovel.

    2. Dean – that 200-250 is the ONLY total I have so far seen – far below the huge numbers of acolytes that the witch claimed she would be bringing 😉 The only ‘tussle’ I have seen documented was one of her (allegedly) ‘unarmed’ body guards using bodily contact – mostly by using his bulk and getting into the personal space – to move an armed counter protestor away. I personally did not see a single protester – way more important to take in the exhibits than to look for malcontents.

    3. “An armed society is a polite society manners are good when one may have to back up his actions with his life.”
      Robert Anson Heinlein from Beyond This Horizon 1942
      Wise words from a wise man.
      Most intelligent people would be just as wise to keep them in mind.

    4. Differing world views is a reality when it comes to guns. I was talking over lunch with a (female) colleague at work when the topic of concealed carry came up, and she opined that she wouldn’t want a friend visiting her home to be carrying a concealed weapon – her reason was that anyone carrying a gun in her home was doing so because they didn’t trust her and thought they’d need to defend themselves against her, so she didn’t trust them.

      I told her that when I had friends over who had concealed weapons, I didn’t mind, as by carrying a gun into my home they were indicating that for the duration of their visit, they’d defend my home as if it were their own. I had no worries about them or their motivations.

      Her reaction was a stereotypical “deer in the headlights” gaze – and she wasn’t all that thrilled when I told her that perhaps she should be a little more careful about choosing her friends!

      1. HankB, also the fact that who knows what could happen between leaving your home and returning, not just protecting her while at her home. If she feels they are carrying to protect themselves from her, maybe there’s a good reason for her to think that. Projection is a reflection on one’s soul. Anti-rights people don’t believe they can control themselves, so they believe no one else can. Over 100 million firearm owners indicates they aren’t the problem.

      2. Most all of us who are armed take seriously to our own selves the duty of seeing to “the security of a free state” wherever we are. Thus, when we DO visit her place, and others like them (bank, fueling station, restaurants, Costco and Home Depot, coffee shop, library, grocery store, etc) we make it our business to assure that everyone around us is also kept safe.

        I sometimes wonder how many of the homes and public places I visit whilst carrying even know I am armed. In my years of going about armed, I can recall only two instances where I’ve been “made”, and in neither of those instances was there any concern. In fact, one was a young man of about fourteen who happened to see the grip of my piece briefly exposed as I was mixing it up with the youngsters out on the footie pitch. His comment? Hey, so whatchya packin there? I wanna see it. Can I? So we stepped off the pitch and I unholstered it , safed it, and showed him it. He thought that was REALLY cool……. That was at a church picnic on the property. All three of our elders, at least two (and most likely all three) of their wives do, and at least sixty percent of the adult males, twenty percent of the adult females, and at least a couple of the adult children all carried regularly. No Texas Church Massacre could ever have happened in that group. MAYBE a perp could get off one round, but never a second

    Leave a Comment 8 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *