National “Right To Carry” For Self-Defense Needs Your Help – Take Action


Take Action Time to Act
National “Right To Carry” A Handgun For Self-Defense Needs Your Help

New York – -( The Arbalest Quarrel recently published an article, Attention All Law Abiding Gun Owners: National Concealed Handgun Reciprocity is in Jeopardy.” And, this wasn’t the first time we wrote specifically on this critical subject.

In February 2018, almost ten months ago, we posted an article discussing 115 H.R. 38, “Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017.” The article is titled, It’s Time for National Handgun Carry Reciprocity to Secure the Citizen’s Right of Armed Self-Defense, Throughout The Country.”

In that article, we stated:

“Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC), introduced the bill on January 3, 2017. The bill passed the House by Roll Call Vote of 231-198, on December 6, 2017. It was sent to the Senate one day later, where it was read twice and then referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. President Trump supports it. The NRA supports it. And, rank and file law enforcement officers support it too. But, there has been to date no further action on it. The bill sits in limbo. Its prospect of passage is, at present, low. Why is that?

What is the U.S. Senate waiting for?”

On June 27, 2018, in the Arbalest Quarrel, under the title, National Concealed Handgun Carry Reciprocity is the Answer To International Islamic Terrorism In The United States,” we once again questioned the seeming lackadaisical attitude of the Senate under the leadership of Mitch McConnell, toward national concealed handgun carry reciprocity. We once again asked,

“What is the status of this [115 H.R. 38] bill? It languishes in Committee.” 

We are still asking. Indeed, why has this bill languished in the Senate Judiciary Committee for almost one year?

Clearly, passage of this bill is critical to the strengthening of the Second Amendment, consistent with the intention of the founders of our free Republic who codified the natural right of the people to keep and bear arms, in our Bill of Rights. Since January 2017, the Arbalest Quarrel has written over twenty articles dealing with the importance of national handgun carry reciprocity. We invite interested readers to take a look at all of our articles.

We know that the Democratic Party leadership, along with virtually all Congressional Democrats, and particularly those of radical “Left,”are adamantly opposed to this bill. The burning $10,000.00 question, though, is this: Is the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, also opposed to national handgun carry reciprocity?

If Senator McConnell isn’t opposed to the bill, the effect of his doing nothing to move it along has the same impact as active opposition to it. Ultimately, Senator McConnell, as the Senate Majority Leader, has absolute or virtually absolute control over what bills are acted upon and what bills are not. He wields immense power. It may be, of course, that Senator McConnell having wished for and having sought bipartisan support on this bill and, realizing he was unable to obtain it, has been resigned to simply ignoring it, thereby allowing the bill to lapse of its own accord, without action in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where it presently sits. But, what can be more important than our fundamental and unalienable rights and liberties, especially the right of the people to keep and bear arms, for the purpose of self-defense and as the ultimate fail-safe mechanism to prevent tyranny?

If the American people have to wait for conditions to be “right” for passage of national handgun carry reciprocity, we may be waiting until Hell freezes over, especially with so many new radical Left elements poised to flex their muscle when the 116th Congress takes over on January 3, 2019. That is why it is necessary to fast-track the Senate bill on this without further delay, so it can be sent to President Trump for his signature before the lame-duck Senate adjourns for the Christmas Holiday. For, if the lame-duck Senate does not act at once, all unfinished business of the 115th Congress remains unfinished—dead—until or unless any pending bill of the previous, 115th Congress, is reintroduced in the 116th Congress, when Congressional business starts anew.

Once the 116th Congress commences business in January 2019, however, you can forget about passage of national handgun carry reciprocity and you can forget about passage of any other bill that serves to strengthen the Second Amendment. For, if there is one thing Congressional Democrats—who will seat a majority in the House of Representatives—will focus their energies on, apart from continuing their effort to undermine President Trump, and apart from their singular objective to open our Southern border to thousands, more, of illegal aliens, it is their single-minded desire and goal to weaken the Second Amendment. And, they seek to accomplish that through federal Statute, to the point that the right embodied in the Second Amendment becomes essentially non-existent.

Remember, this: no bill becomes law unless both Houses of Congress agree on passage of a bill and the U.S. President then signs the bill into law. It is reasonable to assume that a Democratic Party majority in the House of Representatives will have no incentive to strengthenthe Second Amendment—and this is no understatement. So, if national handgun carry reciprocity, which passed the Republican controlled House in 2017, does not see passage in the Senate now, it will go nowhere, in 2019.

The newly reconfirmed Democratic Party House Speaker Nancy Pelosi—will likely never allow national handgun carry reciprocity, or any other Pro-Second Amendment bill, to make it to the Floor of the House for debate and for a vote by the full House even if a Republican House member reintroduces national handgun carry reciprocity in 2019. And, if for some reason Nancy Pelosi, were to allow debate and a roll-call vote of a new national handgun carry reciprocity measure on the Floor of the House in 2019 or 2020, it would only happen if she knew the bill would fail and, of course, she would want the bill to fail, as she is a fierce opponent of the individual right to keep and bear arms, embodied in the Second Amendment.

Time is therefore of the essence. If we are to see national handgun carry reciprocity, the Senate must act promptly on the bill that passed the House under Representative Paul Ryan, and which is now and has been suspended in the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

Ammoland Shooting Sports News and The Truth About Guns  immediately posted, on their websites, our article calling for Americans to urge the Senate to act on the bill the Senate has been sitting on for almost a year. And it is a top story. If you do a search on Google, using the phrase, “national handgun carry,” you will see also that the Arbalest Quarrel article, as it appears on Ammoland Shooting Sports News, has the number one spot, and the article has held that spot for several days.

The Arbalest Quarrel continues to reach out to Pro-Second Amendment organizations and to responsible social media and news sources to mount a last-ditch grass-roots effort for passage of the “Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017.”

Over the past few days, we have made substantial progress and hope remains. We trust that thousands of American citizens have responded to our plea and have made calls to Senators Mitch McConnell and Charles Grassley, and that they have contacted NRA and the White House, too. And, we know that thousands of Americans who cherish their sacred Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms have responded with their views and comments on Pro-Second Amendment websites and social media to get the word out. Your message to Senate Republicans should be clear and clearly expressed: “If you want my vote, pass national concealed handgun carry reciprocity now!” “Votes” are one thing that all politicians know well and are sensitive to.

The Arbalest Quarrel is doing its part. To further this important and timely matter. The President of the Arbalest Quarrel, Stephen L. D'Andrilli, sent a letter to Vice President Mike Pence, asking the Vice President to urge President Trump to call the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, urging Senator McConnell to hold a full Senate Roll-Call vote on the bill, before the Senate adjourns for the Christmas Holiday, and the business of the 115th Congress ends.

The content of that letter which was sent on official Arbalest Quarrel letterhead, on Tuesday, November 27, 2018, via Priority FedEx Overnight, is as follows:

November 27, 2018                                 via FedEx Priority Overnight

The Vice President of the United States The White House
Office of the Vice President
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20500

Re: National Concealed Handgun Carry Reciprocity

Dear Mr. Vice President:

I had the distinct honor and privilege of meeting and talking with you at the 2014 annual convention of the NRA, in Indianapolis, and, once again, a year later, at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in New York City, where you were a guest speaker at the New York Meeting. This coming April 2019, I will be attending the NRA Convention that will be held once again in Indianapolis.

I am aware that a central plank of the Democratic Party leadership is directed to destruction of the Second Amendment-the surest path to tyranny if the Democratic Party succeeds. So, the best way to derail the Democratic Party's efforts is to strengthen the Second Amendment. It is essentially for this reason that I am writing to you, and I am doing so out of a sense of urgency, as time is of the essence.

Almost one year ago, the Republican controlled House voted for passage of 115 H.R. 38, “Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. “The House passed the bill on December 6, 2017, and it was immediately sent to the Senate for action. If Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, had pushed for passage of the bill, I feel certain it would have passed in the Republican controlled Senate. But, inexplicably, and disturbingly, the bill has lied dormant in the Senate Judiciary Committee, for almost a year.

A Democratic Party controlled House will likely not allow for passage of a bill for national concealed handgun carry reciprocity. So, any attempt by Senate Republicans to resurrect the bill in a Republican controlled Senate, when the new Congress commences business, on January 3, 2019, will be futile. We therefore have only a small window of opportunity remaining before the Senate recess. This is why the Senate must pass this measure without delay and present it to President Trump for his signature, before the Senate adjourns on December 14, 2018.

On our website, the Arbalest Quarrel, have discussed the importance of moving this bill through the Senate, while Republicans control both Houses of Congress. The link to our article is: We invite both you and President Trump to review our article and to act on this.

Nothing has more importance to me than the sacred rights and liberties set forth in our Constitution, and the preservation of our way of life, grounded in the Judea-Christian ethic. Both are under constant assault by Leftist elements inside our Country and outside it, and by our purported “free” Press.

As President Trump has made support of the Second Amendment an important part of his campaign, national handgun carry reciprocity would stand as his most important achievement in safeguarding the individual's natural right of self-defense with a firearm. And, too, defending the Second Amendment through passage of this bill will demonstrate to millions of American citizens the veracity of the President ‘ s promises, the value of his word, and the strength of the President's will to complete what he sets out to do.

I respectfully request you urge President Trump to call upon Senator McConnell to hold a Senate floor roll-call vote on national handgun carry reciprocity before the Senate adjourns on December 14, 2018.

I welcome the opportunity to assist further in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may be of help. Thank you very much.

Respectfully submitted, _____________

Time is of the essence. The fight is not over. Right-To-Carry nationwide is still possible. Keep in mind what the late Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. said: “A right delayed is a right denied.” And, many of you may recall the profound witticism of the late, great New York Yankees baseball catcher, Yogi Berra: “It ain’t over till it’s over.”

Please do your part, write your Federal Senators. Tell them to help make National Concealed Handgun Carry Reciprocity the Law of the Land.  Whether it's one or two phone calls or a quick text message, doing something is better than doing nothing. The fate of national handgun carry reciprocity and the fate of our fundamental, natural right, etched in stone in the Second Amendment, is ultimately in your hands.

Arbalest Quarrel

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel' website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit:

  • 36 thoughts on “National “Right To Carry” For Self-Defense Needs Your Help – Take Action

    1. When will we be able to protect ourselves and our families when traveling out of state? – Constitutional Carry

      Florida sheriff is urging citizens to arm themselves in preparation for terror attacks

      When will we be able to protect ourselves and our families when traveling out of state? – Constitutional Carry
      National Reciprocity NOW

      FBI Stats Confirm Constitutional Carry REDUCES Crime

      Cops On Constitutional Carry

      Ryan Blocking Concealed Carry Reciprocity, Congressman Tells AAR

      Caught: GOP Cowards Breaking Promise on Largest Gun Rights Bill …

      UN quietly pushes International Gun Control

      1. The Supremacy Clause (Article 6) makes it very clear that all of these “infringing” laws are null and void, and absolutely no one has a duty to ENFORCE them or OBEY them. They get away with enforcing them AT THE POINT OF A GUN, and using the bottomless resources of the taxpayer funded State to make life miserable for patriot law abiding citizens. LEO’s need to be re-educated on the Constitution, the Supremacy Clause, and their duty NOT to enforce illegal laws. It’s time we started holding Judges, lawyers, LEO’s, politicians, and lawmakers accountable. It’s time that all gun owners marched on their respective State Houses if the officials are attempting to destroy the Constitution and the 2A. There are literally hundreds of millions of Communist Indoctrinated fighting aged men watching to see what happens with this first caravan. If they get in, what will happen if they have caches of fully automatic weapons ready for them, just like they had caches of food, water, medical supplies, and busses to get them where they are now ? What if they all vote Commie-Demonrat style to disarm America, and become the armed tyrants that come knocking on your door at 2am ? The “Militia of the Several States”, and everyone else who sees what is going on, should be down there at the border to let the military know that we got their backs. And more and more info is coming out supporting the proposition that George Boy Soros is financing this operation. In case you don’t know who that dirtbag is, he is the guy who was on the cove of a National Mag (TIME ?) back in 1979 or so, saying “I hate America and everyone in it”. He was a Jew who worked with the Nazi’s, making lists of who was next to take a train ride and have all their wealth confiscated. He was one of Hitler’s 150,000 Jewish soldiers.

    2. I want the federal government involved in as few things in my life as possible. Seems to me having the feds run the reciprocity merry-go-’round would be about as successful as their running health care, tax reform and all the other programs where they got control and created a class 1 Embuggerment. The ultimate “cost” is just not worth the benefit.

      1. Bigg – the Feds will be just as much engaged in National Reciprocity as they are in your drivers license. When’s the last time the Feds checked your drivers license ?

        1. Feds checked MY driving license the last time my state demanded to fleece me again for the “priviledge” of traveling via motor vehicle.Further, Feds have imposed a new boondoggle on states setting “standards” for driving licenses. I don’t have to renew again for a few more years, but I am given to believe that when I DO, it will be a LOT more costly because of all the rigmarole Uncle Stupid have imposed on us. Of course, my stupid state rolled over feet in the air and panted heavily when they “asked nicely” that the state change their requirements for DL. Further, thanks to Uncle Stupid, my state demanded they see my birth certificate…. thankfully I HAD one, though it was not a “certificate of live birth” per current Fed standards (like thekinyun never showed, but I guess that pig is more equal than I am) which is what they demanded. It was a stamped certified copy of the original hospital Live Birthl Certificate. The window clerk examined it, looked scared of confused, walked off with it and consulted a few others. She came back, handed it me, and asked for the next demanded document. I’ve been licensed in this silly state for near thirtyyears now and they’ve never wanted to see that.

          Think they won’t flex their Fed Muscles and dream up a whole mountain of similiar stuff before “granting me permission” to own/carry a handgun or any gun? They’ll be setting minimum standards for the Mother May I Card itself, for training, for insurance, (its only common sense, after all….), requirng the very gun I carry to be registered with the Mother May I Card to carry it before long…

          No thanks. ‘Tain’t in their baliwick nohow anyway.

        2. State of Kansas (corporation commission ) reviewing CDL drivers . “Requested” (demanded ) I go to KDOT purchase a written copy of my driving record and send it in for their files! I told them looks like its time I’m way past 65 for me to finally retire . Which may be part of their goal, Profiling & Age Discrimination you see.

          1. Stupid people. One department of Kansas government has ready access to records of other department/agencies of the same state. I’m surprised they’ve not just mandated KDOT simply forward their entire database to Stateof Kansas.

            In my state just about everything is cross-referenced between departments, so much so its just about one big database. Copper lights me up, before I’ve rolled to a stop he knows I have the Mother May I Card and am thus likely packing. Most are cool with that cause they KNOW we are statistically more law abiding than they are. But some….. oooohhh, BAD case of knickers all knotted up.

    3. Bwahahaha! Y’all starting to get the impression we been played?” Give us the House”.”Give us the Senate”.”Give us the Oval Office”. So we did.What did we get in return? To use an old Army saying: Hard Dick and Bubblegum.Mitch,Paul, and all the rest of these Uni-Party traitors have purposely slow walked the Presidents agenda and never stood up against the ongoing attacks on him.Im done with them all.Its time for us Patriots to start a new party.Not an AfriAsia Elephant. Not a Jackass.But the American Eagle Party.We can invite POTUS to lead it.If he refuses shitcan him also.

      1. There IS way too much ceded to FedGov in this Reciprocity bill, and I don’t like that. When someone writes a bill that is just and does not grant power to fedGov to control, I’ll support it.

        HOWEVER, I read the piece from 10AC. I generally agree with those guys, and appreciate what they do. BUT as I read the article, I relaised their idea of how the Bill or Rights works is radically different than what I have learned of it.

        If they are correct on the arms issue, that one state can pass restrictive/prohibition laws with umpinity and FedGov have no authority to overrule, that puts is in a wuandary:
        it would mean that any state can pass laws denying the right to trial by jury, or to refuse to tetify against myself, or to applu the death penalty to speeding ten over the posted limit. A state could further enact laws denying me the freedom to write a letter to the editor of the local fishwrap, or to protest some stupid bill by standing on the front lawn of the lge building with a sign. That state could also mandate I attend weekly services in the First Church of Evolutioinary Science, or to seize my land and evict me from my home because someone remembered they thought they saw a Northern Spotted Dog cuttingacross the back corner of it ten years ago, and pay me nothing for it.

        As each of the fifty seven (wink) sovereign states agreed to join the Union, they did so, the first 13 demanding a “Bill of Rights”, all the others agreeing to that set of limits on government, to be binding on each and all of the states.Yes Maryland were Catholid, Massachussetts were Congregational, Pensylvania ewere Quaker, but NONE of those states could do anything to prevent the Quaker from Pennsylvania exercising his own “religion” in Maryland, No state could regulate the free press operating within it, nor prohibit anyone’s right to a trial by jury of PEERS, nor to having legal representation at trial, nor force him to tstify agaisnt himself Nor can any state prohibit the free entry of anyone from any other state, or to join together with other PEOPLE within the state for commerce, social, poitical, etc, activities or interests. Nor can any of those states INFRINGE upom MY right, whether I am a resident of that , or of any other, state to keep and bear arms.

        Yes, Washingotn can declare I cannot carry my handgun into a bar, Oregon can declare I can go in there armed but not drink, another state can say I can go in there AND drink but not be “intosicated’ and define drunk” as .08%BAC, or any other random number they choose, Montana can say I canot carry in banks, Utah in churches, Texas in churches with permission from leadership, theyALL agreed to that when they joined the union.

        Mother May I Cards, mag capacity limits, style of weapon, calibre restrictions, limits on how/when/where/what I can carry, fees for “permission”, mandating a flashing blue strobe on a helmet to be worn when carrying concealed, all such things are “infringements” and NO STATE or local government can do that.

        I cannot believe the Tenth Ammendment Centre would deem the Second to be any less binding at the state level than the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, etc.

        But none of this changes my problems with this specific reciprocity bill.

        How’s about a new bill clarifying the language in the Second,, clearly establishing that it does indeed bind ALL states from infringements on that right, and then defines “infringe” and examples of the types of things that consitute infringements.

        FedGov must NOT enact a positive law such as this one, establishing protocols anc controls. But it must enact negative law, clarifying our right and prohibiting or negating any laws or policies restricting it.

    4. I live in Oregon, and both my Congressmen are Democrats. One has used the excuse of not allowing other states to dictate to us, as to why he opposes the Bill. His argument ignores the plight of Oregonians who accidentally get caught up in other state’s draconian anti-gun laws, but that is what Democrats do, they ignore everything that doesn’t fit into their own agendas. We also need term limits on top of everything else.

      1. Term limits are already enshrined in the Constitution. They are called elections and are held on a regular basis. The REAL problem is most citizens can’t be bothered to get off of their collective fat azzes to bother to REGISTER to vote, much less cast a ballot. ‘We have met the enemy and he is us’ – Pogo.

      2. Indeed. Oregon is lost to the conversation on anything to do with this. We are already a “Red Flag” state, the unlawful, gestapo tactics of firearm seizure. That is just a beginning. The irony is that even just 15 years ago, we were still in a relative balance in Oregon, holding to our state’s historical set of beliefs, our heritage, the sense of freedom we oncehad. Almost overnight, Oregon absorbed so many “outsiders”, who brought with them the very problems they left, such as the Californian influx, that our very foundation crumbled, being replaced by Left-wing, liberal and Democratic dogmatics, who exacerbated our decline by even more importation of urban, liberal-thinking people.
        So now, Portland, Eugene and the other major population centers hold the reins over our direction, a very distinct yaw to the Left. No hope, no help from our congressional delegation.

    5. Guys, if you want to contact Trump to light a fire under Grassley’s and McConnell’s collective butts, you gotta use email by going to and select “Contact the President” in the first dropdown menu. I already killed two birds with one stone and mentioned BOTH National CCW reciprocity AND walking back the bump stock ban! You should do likewise!

    6. I have been following this article sense it came out on ammoland and have seen this question asked before don’t they need 61 votes to get it threw? I asked that same question also but never saw an reply is there anybody out there know? ps I called the white house mitch but could not get threw to the n r a they were all very busy

      1. My understanding is it takes 60 votes to close off filibusters but only 51 votes to actually pass a bill in the the Senate. The ‘nuclear option’ used by Harry Reid eliminated the 60 votes rule concerning Presidential nominees.

    7. Anybody mailing anything to DC does know that there is a screening process in place that takes a letter 2-3 weeks to arrive at the intended receiver’s office, right? That is before it goes through whatever filter/staffer inside the office.Nothing gets through faster than that due to the crazies sending powder and other stuff through the mail to their reps.

      If you have to mail something, you’re better off mailing it to a state or local office. Not sure how you get something sooner to the Pres or VP.

    8. To snuffy TN and some others: Enough of this self-centered infighting. Let’s stand together and get this passed in the Senate, for ours and posterity’s sake. I live in a state where I cannot benefit because here it’s May Issue. But I realize there are millions of law abiding in the US who can benefit.

    9. The media is so biased! What type person commits murder with a firearm? Are they European american, African american, mexican, Asian or what? Where facts is what American People need to understand things. Again, there’s people stabbed to death, blundgeoned to death, etc.
      Just like fetanyl. Is it drug overdose or actually successful drug? Many people have been wanting legalized euthanasia. Are some using fetanyl for euthanasia or is it actual drug abuse? Because of political bias, I don’t think we’ll ever hear the truth as too many have motives for what they say and how they say it.
      To those outside of regular life, oh this is so terrible, something must be done. Then form a think tank that knows little or know biased information.
      Just like there’s a whole lot of criminals/predators that don t want people to have guns because they might get shot. Where we wouldn’t need lifelong as conservative talk shows promote to protect ourselves from identity theft. Where they’re getting paid for promoting it. But the Declaration of Independence states the government has the responsibility of protecting the rights of citizens from others, the same as we are to be protected from government from violating these rights. But that would require effort and work. So if it were pushed, guvuhment would say it costs money to organize a task force, where we know it’s bull, we simply need those entrusted with that authority to do what they are paid to do.
      Here again, with 325,000,000 people, these crimes are actually miniscule. Where it’s only had news that makes news and to maintain profits, the media really lays it on, hot and heavy. Keep harping, where they make people believe a mole hill is a mountain. Money talks. Remember the media is an industry now, it isn’t a reporting agency as it was intended to be. Where an industry doesn’t worry about right and wrong, they worry about, how can I can extra money! How do that do this? By playing things up.

    10. Turtle McConnel said the “ timing”wasn’t right to bring it to a floor vote ; by what thought process does he think that the timing would be better at a later date?
      If it fails on the floor now , so what? It’s gonna die an unatural death on Jan 2 anyhow, if the Senate doesn’t act on it ! At least we could see which Senators voted against the bill, unless they take the chicken way out with a voice vote !

    11. When you take a oath to uphold the Constitution when you take office and you don’t then you should loose your job as senator or congressman, and forfeit all.I can’t believe that more senators and representatives have not been terminated for this. They all take the oath when elected . If the elected officials we put in office are not up holding the Constitution but trying to change it to suit party wants and needs then get them out of office for not upholding the very thing they were intrusted to do.

    12. In AZ we have Flake (a hopeless cause lame duck) and now Sinema (a radical leftist), McCain who is taking a dirt nap and another lame duck filling in for him. They are all a waste of postage.

    13. I am unsure that this would pass in the Senate. Don’t they need 60 votes to get this through? Because if it must, then they don’t have the votes. I wonder how a bill can be designated to get by with a simple majority like so many other bills have. If it only takes 50-51, then yeah Grassley needs to get to work!!

    14. I just sent the Trumpster a postcard asking him to tell Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to get the lead out of his feet and get 115 H.R. 38 passed and sent to him for signing. I also asked him to bone up on the Supremacy Clause because we really don’t need the governments permission to keep and bear arms. If we could get gun owners to grow some gonads, and assemble while armed outside our respective gun grabbing State Houses, those TRAITORS might get reminded that we mean business and we won’t be pushed around anymore with all of their infringing laws that are null and void from the get go. And in doing so, we might inform them that it seems to us that they are waging a war against our cherished Constitution, and that there is only so much of our good nature that we will allow them to take advantage of.

      1. And late last night on the 30th, while searching for a phone number where I could leave a voice mail, I found one of his addresses that had one of those email type CONTACT buttons. So I typed in a message to him regarding that Reciprocity bill. One phone number I called had a voice message that said they had very high number of people calling, so there would be a delay. Apparently, he has about 4 offices spread around Kentucky, so my advice would be to keep trying at the phone numbers provided, and leave a typed contact message if they have one. If you type a message in, you will get an automatic return email thanking you for your thoughts, but the one I got didn’t have a copy of what my “thoughts” were. Some senators reply with a copy of what you wrote. The point being, just keep trying.

    15. Tennessee has good firearms and carry laws, We and seven other states also have laws to stop federal agents trying to enforce federal firearm laws that go above and beyond our state laws, up to detaining and prosecuting the said Feds. Let the citizen voters determine who makes the laws in each state. I don’t want the Feds messing with my guns.

    Leave a Comment 36 Comments