Who Will Secure the Right of the American People to Keep and Bear Arms? PART ONE

Who Will Secure the Right of the American People to Keep and Bear Arms? PART ONE
Who Will Secure the Right of the American People to Keep and Bear Arms? PART ONE

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- We begin with one simple basic, indisputable, but melancholy truth: No Branch of our Government cares deeply about preserving and strengthening the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; neither Congress; nor the U.S. Supreme Court; nor, for that matter, the Chief Executive of our Nation, President Donald Trump.

Sure, there are outliers in Congress and on the High Court who seek to preserve, protect, and strengthen the sacred right of the people to keep and bear arms, but they are few in number; pathetically few in number; and President Trump’s own stand on the Second Amendment has been lukewarm at best. Yes, the President claims to support the Second Amendment. Like all politicians, he knows how to pontificate, and he does so better than most. But what has he done to set his lofty, grandiose words to action? The only concrete Second Amendment action he has taken that we can recall was one decidedly against buttressing our sacred, inviolate right.

Do you remember what President Trump did? He ordered the DOJ to revise the definition of ‘machine gun’ to include bump stocks in the legal definition. The resulting change distorts decades of industry and military usage and understanding of the expression, ‘machine gun.’ Regardless, Trump ordered the DOJ to follow through with this change. He did this ostensibly to placate those folks who don’t want the American citizenry to own and possess firearms at all; to mollify those maniacal ideologues who have a visceral abhorrence of firearms; who harbor ill will toward those who wish to exercise their God-given right to own and possess firearms; and who will not rest until they have: one, banned civilian ownership and possession of firearms; and two, have collected all firearms and ammunition from American civilian citizens; and three, have, destroyed all civilian caches of firearms and ammunition, imprisoning those who they deem hoarders of firearms and ammunition; and, four, have erased the language of the Second Amendment from the U.S. Constitution and from all lexicons.

The appetite of those Destroyers of our Nation who would crush the American people into submission will never be sated until all thought and action has been brought under complete control through massive indoctrination and confiscation of all firearms from the commonalty.

In an Arbalest Quarrel article posted on December 31, 2018, we cited President Trump’s memorandum directed to the Attorney General, who, at the time, was the useless, milquetoast, Jeff Sessions. President Trump wrote, in part:

“ ‘After the deadly mass murder in Las Vegas, Nevada, on October 1, 2017, I asked my Administration to fully review how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives regulates bump fire stocks and similar devices.

Although the Obama Administration repeatedly concluded that particular bump stock type devices were lawful to purchase and possess, I sought further clarification of the law restricting fully automatic machine guns.

Accordingly, following established legal protocols, the Department of Justice started the process of promulgating a Federal regulation interpreting the definition of ‘machine gun’ under Federal law to clarify whether certain bump stock type devices should be illegal.’”

And, what became of national handgun carry reciprocity?

On February 18, 2018, the Arbalest Quarrel wrote,

“The ‘Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017’ (115 H.R. 38) amends the federal criminal code to allow a qualified individual to carry a concealed handgun into or possess a concealed handgun in another state that allows individuals to carry concealed firearms.

Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC), introduced the bill on January 3, 2017. The bill passed the House by Roll Call Vote of 231-198, on December 6, 2017. It was sent to the Senate one day later, where it was read twice and then referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. President Trump supports it.

The NRA supports it. And rank and file law enforcement officers support it too. But there has been to date no further action on it. The bill sits in limbo. Its prospect of passage is, at present, low. Why is that?”

Did Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, wish to see enactment of a national concealed handgun carry reciprocity law? We know McConnell can get things done when he wants to. But apparently McConnell didn’t want this.

Perhaps, the Senate Majority Leader was waiting for a signal from President Trump to proceed, grounded on Trump’s stated policy position on the Second Amendment.

Do you remember what President Trump originally had told the American public about the primordial right of self-defense? The Arbalest Quarrel remembers all too well what Trump said.

In our December 31, 2018 post, we cited Trump’s imperious words that,

“ ‘The right of self-defense doesn’t stop at the end of your driveway. That’s why I have a concealed carry permit and why tens of millions of Americans do too. That permit should be valid in all 50 states. A driver’s license works in every state, so it’s common sense that a concealed carry permit should work in every state. If we can do that for driving – which is a privilege, not a right – then, surely, we can do that for concealed carry, which is a right, not a privilege.’ ~ Donald J. Trump on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms”

Sadly, these were just the pompous, pretentious, empty, disingenuous, and deceitful words of a politician. In that same Arbalest Quarrel post, we cited to an article appearing in the Washington Examiner that reported:

“ ‘President Trump told Republicans on Wednesday they should not include a measure that allows people with concealed carry permits in one state to carry across state lines in a comprehensive gun bill.

‘ ‘I think that maybe that bill will one day pass, but it should pass separate,’ Trump said during a bipartisan meeting at the White House. ‘If you’re going to put concealed carry between states into this bill, we’re talking about a whole new ball game. I’m with you, but let it be a separate bill.’ ’”

The President weaseled, giving, at best, only lukewarm support for national concealed handgun carry reciprocity legislation. Obviously, this wasn’t a high priority for him.

Mitch McConnell likely interpreted these words to mean the President wasn’t behind national concealed handgun carry legislation, and, so, he wouldn’t support this measure either. And McConnell thereupon allowed the bill to die in Committee; And die it did, and that is the last anyone has seen of national handgun carry reciprocity up to this very moment in time.

What does this tell you? A Republican U.S. President and a Republican Senate—with both House and Senate in Republican control—don’t give a damn about our fundamental right of the people keep and bear arms.

And the failure of the U.S. Supreme Court to protect civilian citizen ownership and possession of semiautomatic firearms has placed the safety and well-being of all Americans in jeopardy. One is reminded of the old adage: “action speaks louder than words.” Recall that in the 2018 Midterm elections the Radical Left Democrats took control of the House. National concealed handgun carry legislation became a dead letter and will remain so.

In the upcoming General Election, the Radical Left Democrats intend to keep control of the House, gain control of the Senate—which will escalate New York Senator Chuck Schumer to the Senate Majority leader position—and regain the White House. If all this should transpire, the safety and well-being of the entire citizenry will be at substantial risk. The American public is getting a foretaste of this now as fanatical, rabid, dangerous Marxist and Anarchist protestors, rioters, arsonists, and looters run amok, given a free hand to destroy the very fabric of a free Constitutional Republic, and, in the process, jeopardizing the safety, security, and well-being of us all.

What this means is that, despite a timorous, timid Republican-controlled Senate, and an irresolute President, this is the best we can hope for at the moment. Neither Senator Mitch McConnell, nor President Trump will take affirmative steps to preserve and strengthen the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but, fortunately, they seem reluctant to weaken the Second Amendment. A neutral stance is the best we can expect from either of them. That will have to suffice given the appalling prospect for Americans if the Marxists prevail ion the upcoming General election.

As Public Order Devolves Into Mass Disorder; Expect Calls For Total Civilian Disarmament

What does the present “summer of love,” as the Mayor of Seattle refers to the violence happening in Seattle and throughout the Country, portend? We are seeing it: a Marxist Counter-Revolution, long simmering, now boiling over into a full-on Civil War.

If ever the right of the people to keep and bear arms had critical import, it does so now; today, at this very moment. But the ruthless Globalist forces fomenting violence do not want to have to contend with an armed citizenry dead-set on preserving a Free Constitutional Republic.

So, don’t be surprised to see a concerted attempt by Marxist State leaders calling for suspension of fundamental rights, especially the right embodied in the Second Amendment, in a Marxist led Government.

We expect that Radical Left State and local Governments, sympathetic to the destruction of a free Republic, will call for a total ban on civilian ownership of firearms, citing a public emergency, as thousands of rioters, looters, arsonists, vandals, muggers, and murderers cause disruption across the Nation—destruction that these Marxist Governments not only allow to happen but actively encourage.

So, then, in answer to the question posed at the beginning of the article, as set forth in the title of article, is this:

It falls to the American people, themselves, to secure their fundamental, unalienable, immutable, and illimitable right to keep and bear arms, and thereby preserve and protect the autonomy of the individual, the integrity of Selfhood, and the sovereignty of the American people.

 


Arbalest Quarrel

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

16 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jaque

Ultimately, I believe the only way the 2nd Amendment will either thrive or die will be the outcome of a second revolution in the US. The Declaration of Independence provides the vehicle for such change.

However I don’t believe enough of todays Americans posess the character, ability, and drive to defend the Constitution should a communist insurgency go hot. The feckless Rinos in congress as the people’s representatives have shown no will to fight the current day insurgency. So I suspect the citizens they represent will not fight either. I hope I am wrong

nrringlee

Correct. We will fragment in to regional powers. Some will be bolshevik and some libertarian. Instead of liberty loving people fleeing from Blue Utopias you will have progressives and socialists fleeing to the Blue Utopias. The libertarian leaning parts of the country will remain universally armed with something akin to mandatory militia service to defend those enclaves from corporate thug armies like Blackwater, Dyncorps and the rest of the criminal corporations. It will be perpetual war, and as Burke tells us, life will be nasty, short and brutish. But on our side it will be free.

TNJEWBOY

These politicians (Except Tom Massie) are worthless. All they care about is getting elected and reelected.

It’s time each and every one of them are removed.

Get some ordinary people in there who have the brains to ask this question about each and every bill being proposed.

“IF THIS BILL PASSES WILL IT INCREASE THE SIZE, COST, REACH AND POWER OF GOVERNMENT???”

Then if any of those conditions are met then they should VOTE NO because we have too much government now.

chocopot

Amen to that. If only…

badlands

The Republicans allowed reciprocity to die on the vine, hiding under their desks until it did. Opposing Democrats realized that they really had to do nothing…McConnell and Ryan didn’t want it. It was dead. Republicans had 6 years to prepare for their 2 year Congressional reign, and had absolutely no idea what they were going to do once they got it. Any politician of any stripe can never, EVER be relied upon to have our best interests in mind.

Arm up, remain vigilant. Only we can preserve this country if it’s not already too late.

nrringlee

Republicans do what is good for their party and not for the people. The same with Democrats. The Democrats have picked the path of Bolshevik socialism because socialism is good for the socialists and is not good for the people. Power. It is simply about power. The Declaration, the Constitution, The Bill of Rights, all of the grand statutory hyperbole is just paper to them. They seek power. Over you and me.

gregs

it is Washington vs. America, the USSC makes law from the bench, congress abdicates their authority to the judicial branch so they won’t have to defend their positions and even the executive branch has not been the supporter of the freedoms espoused in the Bill of Rights. once in office, the only thing they do is fundraise for the net election cycle. if there are term limits for president, there should be for all political offices. lifetime government employment was not what our founding fathers wanted to happen. they lose connection to the people whom they are supposed to represent.… Read more »

USMC0351Grunt

It wasn’t the Republicans it was, We, the complacent People that ALLOWED this to die on the vine, because had we gotten on the phones and on e-mail and in their faces physically in Washington DC and at their field offices; I seriously doubt that any of them would have gone to work the next day and thought of anything else other than to push National Reciprocity for concealed carry as well as the Hearing Safety Act or whatever fancy-ass name they choose to use to make it look and seem everybody’s working hard at protecting our Liberty, freedom and… Read more »

Last edited 3 years ago by USMC0351Grunt
USMC0351Grunt

I along with the great person that will remain anonymous, my two sons, a high school buddy from the seventies and a great company out of Austin are the only ones that have stepped up to the plate to throw in a few shekels toward launching a lawsuit to set precedence in the state of Texas against anti-gunners.

As far as the 2A community goes? They need to shun their worthless egos and pull the apathy out of their ass and step up to the plate!

https://www.ammoland.com/2020/05/gun-show-promoter-challenges-texas-citys-last-minute-reneging-on-venue-agreement/#ixzz6OjOT18q0

Last edited 3 years ago by USMC0351Grunt
nrringlee

Political organizations based upon political foundations, coalitions of self interests that are primarily economic and cultural will bend with the prevailing winds to preserve their status and privilege within the political arena. Organizations based upon principles who suffer the madness of the crowd to preserve principles will not bend and will be the only hope in preserving the laws of liberty. Of course, the most fundamental way to preserve personal liberty is to simply fight for it, say no, and resist. Doing so as a member of a principle based group with clearly stated ethics out front provide strength in… Read more »

Bob

I am a single-issue voter and as much as I loathe democrats, I would vote for one if he/she was right on 2A over any GOP. If we ever have a civil war, I would do what Lincoln should have done–ban the democrat party from participation in Constitutional politics.

Dt

Can these articles be legally forwarded? Could I post on Facebook or copy right infringement?

uncle dudley

Just because one party may hold the majority in one chamber or both doesn’t mean they have control of all the bills that they present in order to get them passed and sent to the president.
Prime example is the police officer bill that the senate wanted to pass but failed this week, it takes 60 votes to pass and the senate didn’t get 60 members to vote yes.
The same would happen with carry reciprocity.

Stag

Let’s not forget that Trump and the Republicans enacted gun control when they signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 and that said gun control was authored by Republican Senator John Cornyn. Trump and the Republicans have enacted more gun control in the first two years of this administration than the previous two administrations combined. In my lifetime Republicans have successfully enacted more gun control than Democrats.

TEEBONE

“But what has he done to set his lofty, grandiose words to action? The only concrete Second Amendment action he has taken that we can recall was one decidedly against buttressing our sacred, inviolate right.”

That is patently unfair. He has appointed 200 conservative federal judges in less than 4 years as president, and two on the SCOTUS that are light years better than two Hillbillary would have appointed.

I understand your stridency, but you push it to the point of being recalcitrant and ridiculous.

TEEBONE

“But what has he done to set his lofty, grandiose words to action? The only concrete Second Amendment action he has taken that we can recall was one decidedly against buttressing our sacred, inviolate right.”

That is patently unfair. He has appointed 200 conservative federal judges in 4 years as president, and two on the SCOTUS that are light years better than two Hillbillary would have appointed.

I understand your stridency, but you push it to the point of being recalcitrant and ridiculous.