America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
Gun-rights advocates are taking Santa Clara County to court over what they call an “outrageous” concealed-carry permit process that makes it nearly impossible for average residents to exercise their rights.
California lawmakers just voted to ban the sale of Glock pistols — the most popular handgun in America. AB 1127 proves once again that Sacramento isn’t after “safety,” they’re after control, and what starts in California won’t stop there.
California citizen’s ammunition victory was short-lived. As California’s anit-freedom AG has now asked for an en banc rehearing—meaning a larger 11-judge Ninth Circuit panel would reconsider the case.
Citizens are expected to play by the rules in the permitting law, the police administering the scheme are not, giving rise to a reprehensible situation that strips away constitutional rights when they may be most needed.
9th Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta, writing for the majority, said plainly: “California’s ammunition background check regime is unconstitutional… [It] infringes on the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.”
The Los Angeles Sheriff’s Dept’s (LASD) filed a motion to dismiss SAF’s claims and limit any relief going forward to only the individual plaintiffs, but the court saw through that ruse…
This smack-down of California by the Ninth Circuit’s decision sends a clear message: attempts to erase America’s gun culture through censorship will not stand.
Mr. Sanchez’s lawsuit started because he wanted to create and use a 3D-printed suppressor, so he applied for federal authorization to do so, but was denied because suppressors are illegal in California.
The misuse of CLETS for concealed carry checks is explicitly forbidden, and such actions raise significant concerns about the potential impact on lawful gun owners seeking permits.
California’s petty attempt to undercut “gun culture” by eliminating gun shows ignores serious conflicts with both the First and Second Amendments…
Ninth Circuit Grants Stay of Decision in Rhode v. Bonta. The 9th Circuit is up to its old anti-gun, anti-freedom, legal nonsense.
While California will most certainly appeal, this decision represents continued progress in rolling back decades of attacks on the rights of lawful gun owners.
It is an open secret that California politicians hope to pass so many gun control laws that 2nd Amendment advocacy groups can’t keep up….
California last year passed AB 2571 to prohibit any communication or marketing relating to firearms that might be “attractive to minors”.
“Our lawsuit is blunt,” “The Glendale ordinance is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has made it clear that the right to keep and bear arms for personal protection extends outside the home.
Californians have been held hostage under the state’s arbitrary determination of what is a “safe handgun” while the rest of America enjoys modern guns.
The neighbor next door doesn’t like your tree, so she conspires to falsely accuse you of assault and battery after you refuse to remove it. You get arrested as a result.
United States District Court Judge Roger Benitez meant it when he took his oath to uphold the Constitution. Indeed, in recent years, he delivered bold and comprehensive pro-Second Amendment decisions.
Gun owners are receiving text messages on their personal phones claiming that today is the “last day” to get a CCW permit. Be warned, this is a fraudulent claim!
Our Legal Team has been hard at work this weekend to bring you the latest in-depth analysis on what the Duncan Ruling means to you.
“This is a devastating blow to the anti-gunners. Red tape & state database errors made it impossible for hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Californians to purchase ammunition.”
Just minutes after the tragedy and before the ink could dry on the police reports, the gun control zealots exploited the tragedy with their usual rally cry: “this is why we need more gun control laws!
How can the person in this case challenge DOJ’s prohibited person determination when they don’t even know what that determination is based on?
California ammunition retailers were given little if any guidance from the state explaining the procedures for processing ammunition sales, amounting to mass confusion throughout the state.
The problems encountered since the new ammunition background check system was put into effect on July 1st, 2019, have far surpassed what we predicted, and we predicted a train wreck.
Despite the best efforts of well-financed groups like Bloomberg’s Everytown For Gun Safety and Never Again California, the family-friendly Crossroads of the West show can continue to go on for now.
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019, NRA and CRPA will be hosting a free live webinar discussing the upcoming ammunition background check requirements scheduled to take effect July 1st, 2019.
For nearly a decade, the Supreme Court has been mostly silent on the Second Amendment, despite a flood of petitions. The High Court is now poised to speak and many are anxious to hear what it has to..
This monumental victory comes in the NRA and CRPA supported lawsuit titled Duncan v. Becerra, which challenges all of California’s laws banning so-called “large-capacity” magazines.
Unconstitutional laws in California and Hawaii are still being enforced despite the decision made as a result of Young v. Hawaii. You might be wondering why CRPA hasn’t filed a lawsuit?
