Connecticut Carry continues to speak about the uncomfortable truths that result when people are manipulated by politicians when they are the most emotional.
‘March for our Lives’ & Emotional Group Think Makes You Vulnerable To Bad Intentions

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
Connecticut Carry continues to speak about the uncomfortable truths that result when people are manipulated by politicians when they are the most emotional.
The argument is whether or not the mere carrying of a firearm either provides that suspicion or overrides the requirement for reasonable articulable suspicion.
After Governor Dannel Malloy’s announcement this week that he would seek to increase Pistol Permit fees to ridiculous highs.
Your recent call for increased infringements on the rights of Americans (more gun control) coupled with decreased vetting of foreign entities has now reached ‘the Lunatic Fringe’.
The decision in Peruta v. San Diego could not have come at a better time, 5 months prior to a National Election of a new President of these United States.
In the wake of a horrible incident in Orlando, Florida, Connecticut Carry is once again reminded of the importance of its mission statement and Article 1, Section 15 of the Connecticut Constitution…
Connecticut Legislators made their priorities clear when they adjourned the Connecticut legislative session on May 4th. While Connecticut Legislators could not bring themselves to make a timely…..
The memorandum goes on for 5 more pages describing how police in Connecticut can still get away with harassing and detaining citizens not breaking the law!
Governor Dannel Malloy has once again announced that, through his emotional puppet Lt. Gov. Wyman, he will pursue legislation that would erode the right to due process in Connecticut, as well…..
The victim’s mother zip-tied with her son Luke dead from multiple gunshot wounds pleaded with the dispatcher for police & an ambulance for ten minutes…
The very idea that CT Governor Malloy seeks to remove constitutional rights without due process using these secret ‘watch lists’ is despicable & unconstitutional…
As the Connecticut General Assembly adjourned on June 3rd, it was clear that SB 650 had been abandoned and left to wither on the vine.
Demonstrating that this year’s push for automatic confiscation of firearms from anyone accused by a single party of being a threat to anyone else is nothing but a short sighted and ill-researched…..
On March 11th, the Connecticut Judiciary Committee held a Public Hearing to discuss several bills in front of a standing room only hearing room that will impact our individual rights in Connecticut.
We will not be endorsing candidates for the 2014 election! The current crop of political candidates range from downright horrible to only wanting to use us for our votes to absolutely delusional…
This goes hand in hand with Connecticut Carry’s declaration that all legislators that voted for the 2013 Gun Ban are also Unfit for Office…
The Connecticut Bar Association is proposing to support the 2013 Gun Ban in Connecticut, they have chosen to attack ‘the rights of individuals’ instead of safeguarding those rights…
Connecticut Carry has made a significant investment into clarifying parts of the CT Gun Ban Laws which have been the sources of questions as well as areas where people are at risk of criminal penalties…
Using the anti-rights own social media tool against them, Connecticut Carry has engaged them by creating its own Thunderclap campaign which has, so far, completely out paced the anti-rights groups, almost 2 to 1…
Anti-rights groups have announced that they will protest a gun rights rally planned by Connecticut Citizens Defense League for April 5th 2014 using social media. Our response is to counterattack…
The state needs to shit, or get off the pot. The fact is, the state does not have the balls to enforce these laws. The laws would not survive the public outcry and resistance that would occur…
The Peruta decision makes clear that states and municipalities cannot deny their citizens the right to bear arms any more than they can deny their citizens the right to possess arms…
In, yet, another flimsy case, brought and prosecuted by the State of Connecticut, the State is, once again, refusing to drop charges against a Connecticut citizen because of the fact that he owns firearms….
Important questions about these disclosures have also been asked, such as: What action does the state intend to take in response to a prohibited disclosure???
In a letter dated September 10th, 2013, the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection admitted to ‘mistakes’ in sending threatening letters to citizens…
A judge’s role is to be impartial and to render verdicts, rulings and judgments based upon law and case law, certainly not personal opinion…
Threats, intimidation and extortion alleged against the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection…
A Connecticut Federal District Court has rendered a ruling in favor of the innocent and injured spouse of Duane Doutel whose firearms were unjustly seized by Norwalk, CT policemen…
Audio recording demostrates deal making that directly conflicts with the DESPP’s assertion in its complaint that both the DESPP and BFPE lack the authority to make this kind of a deal…
The Connecticut State Police has been sending threatening and misleading letters to Connecticut residents telling them that they must turn in their firearms to the State Police without any lawful justification…