So they’ll go after violations for other rights, but where the Second Amendment is concerned, state entities can do as they please without fear of federal checks?
Request Filed with DOJ for Any Record of Second Amendment Statements of Interest
America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
So they’ll go after violations for other rights, but where the Second Amendment is concerned, state entities can do as they please without fear of federal checks?
“Because of inaction, this Court has allowed the lower courts all the latitude they need to render the Second Amendment a paper tiger,” the brief charges…
It is really a simple request and the way they are going about fighting it and ignoring it is simply bizarre.
…not one single firearms owner has been entered into the service. However…the state has been requiring firearm owners to sign a waiver (of their constitutional rights) and collecting the fees…
“Knives and butterfly knives as a form of knife are bearable arms… Butterfly knives as a form of knife are arms protected by the Second Amendment.”
An application to stay implementation and enforcement of the “bump stock” ban pending a writ of certiorari was filed Tuesday in the Supreme Court…
“New York State Police are hereby ENJOINED from enforcing New York Penal Law … as applied to ‘electronic dart guns’ and ‘electronic stun guns.”
Judge Dabney L. Friedrich, nominated to the court by President Donald Trump, ruled against all motions for a preliminary injunction to find for the administration…
“Mr. Young has now been in the appeals process for approximately six years, two months and nine days.”
The court has scheduled a hearing next Tuesday for oral arguments on the motion for a preliminary injunction in that case.
If I don’t obey the order to rid myself of my twice-confirmed “legal” property, I’ll be branded a felon and subject to life and freedom-destroying punishments.
Get caught in violation and prepare to have your life destroyed through arrest, prosecution, incarceration and a lifetime ban on owning guns.
Did the “bump stock” ban memo go out as reported and who signed off on the rule? Acting AG Whitaker? And what happens to rules he signs if the Democrat lawsuit disqualifies him as ineligible?
“Defendant FBI is unlawfully withholding records requested by Plaintiff pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §552.”
ATF was “not allowed to physically examine the interior of the weapons” recovered from the Las Vegas shooter’s hotel room…
…the question remains why State did not pursue violations by DOJ – and who was involved in making (ordering) that outcome.
That we as individuals must take on a government with limitless resources to fight for our entitlements is an intolerable situation.
When did the State Department find out about Fast and Furious, and what was the Department’s role?
So basically, the FBI is denying you based on its database, and then wholesale refuses to allow you to appeal it.
If they’re going to mandate we get approval from their system, it’s on them to make sure adequate resources are allocated to rectify errors.
“The [Notice of Proposed Rulemaking] scheme is fatally flawed,” Savage demonstrates.
This was clearly a damaged, a violent, and of relevance, a guilty young man, and as we’ve seen in similar cases, the government knew about him.
While bump fire stocks were reported found in the suspected shooter’s hotel room, where are the official reports that the devices were used?
What don’t they want to share, aside from everything? Scroll through the document and see for yourself how a clear and specific request has been dismissed.
A “compiled for law enforcement purposes” deferment hardly seems necessary or reasonable with the killer dead, and suggests some other motive for not releasing requested documents.
Ordinance effectively repeals the City of Philadelphia’s ban on law-abiding adults from owning, using, possessing, selling, or transferring electronic arms, like “stun guns” and Tasers.
Why should an erroneously denied individual be on the hook for thousands of dollars to fix the government’s mistake?
“The National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) is insufficient for criminal proceedings…”
“[The New Jersey statute] is declared unconstitutional in that it violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and shall not be enforced.”
New Jersey Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino has agreed that the state’s total ban on electronic arms is unconstitutional..