CalGuns Foundation Defends Gun Owner Against Misinformed Los Angeles County Sheriff

Joseph Fernandez thankful CGF was there to help, considers legal options against Los Angeles County Sheriff.

CalGuns Foundation
CalGuns Foundation

Los Angeles, CA – -(Ammoland.com)- On October 8, 2012, Joseph Fernandez was driving normally down Hawthorn Blvd. when a Los Angeles County Sheriff Deputy pulled him over, alleging that he stopped to warn Fernandez that there was an unknown object hanging from the rear view mirror and that the vehicle was allegedly straddling lanes, both violations of the Vehicle Code.

During the stop, the Deputy asked Fernandez if there were any weapons inside the vehicle. Fernandez informed the Deputy that he had.

The Deputy detained Fernandez and the other vehicle occupants and conducted a search. The Deputy recovered a “locked black gun case.” Fernandez provided the code for the gun case, and the Deputy recovered two registered and unloaded firearms, magazines, and ammunition. According to Fernandez, the Deputy believed that the firearms were deemed loaded because the magazines and ammunition were carried in the same case as the firearm.

The Deputy read Fernandez his Miranda rights and arrested him, “due to the fact that the firearms were concealed in a case, that they were readily accessible and within his immediate reach, and that there were two loaded magazines directly next to the firearm which can be quickly and easily loaded into the firearm.”

According to Fernandez, only after the Deputy's watch supervisor informed him that the firearms were not “loaded” was he cited for possession of a concealed firearm within a vehicle.

This unfortunate event could have been avoided had the officer been properly trained on the definition of loaded as well as the exemptions to Penal Code section 25400, including Penal Code section 25610(a)(1) which expressly exempts firearms carried “in a locked container.”

Significantly, a criminal case was filed by the Hawthorne City Attorney's office against Mr. Fernandez, indicating a lack of firearms knowledge by the prosecutors. Mr. Fernandez contacted The Calguns Foundation, which considered the matter and took on his legal defense.

On December, 18, 2012, Attorney Jason Davis represented Mr. Fernandez in Court. After Mr. Davis discussed the false arrest error in the arrest and complaint and some professional arguing with the City Prosecutor, the City Prosecutor wisely dismissed the case.

After his case was dismissed, Mr. Fernandez stated, “I really appreciate The Calguns Foundation's efforts and that there's someone out there to protect the firearm rights of Californians like me. Few people know the details of California's intricate firearm laws, and even fewer can effectively represent their members and our Second Amendment rights like CGF does.”

“Please, support CGF so that they can continue defending innocent California gun owners in circumstances like mine.”

Mr. Fernandez is now considering his legal options against Los Angeles.

About CALGUNS FOUNDATION:
The Calguns Foundation (www.calgunsfoundation.org) is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization which serves its members by providing Second Amendment-related education, strategic litigation and the defense of innocent California gun owners from improper or malicious prosecution. The Calguns Foundation seeks to inform government and protect the rights of individuals to acquire, own, and lawfully use firearms in California. Visit:www.calgunsfoundation.org

  • 5 thoughts on “CalGuns Foundation Defends Gun Owner Against Misinformed Los Angeles County Sheriff

    1. As sad as this incident is, suing the City or the State for their Employees errors only punishes the taxpayers who by extortion of private property

      (tax dollars), pays for the lawsuit Awards.

      If any law is in place whereby the individual Police Officer could be sued for his error or lack of knowledge of the laws, this would be a much better System because then the Individual Officer would have to pay for his error out of his Bond which every Police Officer must purchase in order to be a Police Officer.

      Their Bond is like an Insurance policy for any harm or wrongdoing they bring to other people in their Line of Duties as a Police Officer. I believe the Individual Police Officer should be the one that should have to pay any Lawsuit Awards instead of the Taxpayers, after all the taxpayers didn't make the error of Arresting an innocent law abiding person.

      If such a law does not exist at this point in time, perhaps there should be a push to Lawmakers to create a law that States the individual Officer can be sued and will be held Financially Accountable for violations of Civil Rights against Innocent civilians in his/her line of Duty to the citizens of his/her State.

      This I believe would be a much better outcome if Law Enforcement Officers knew they themselves could be held Financially Accountable against any wrongdoing they commit against citizens. This would make them think twice before assuming they are always correct. The taxpayers of a City or State should not be punished for the wrongdoing of a City or State Employee, the taxpayers did not commit the error of arresting an innocent person.

    2. Glad I live in mississippi. Vehicle is an extension of your home here per our castle law. Anything legal to have in your home, you can have in your car. CCW also solves this, so I'm covered in two ways.

    3. I wonder if this was a case of the cop being ignorant of the law, or just making up his own interpretation on the spot?

      Not the first time things like this have happened.

    4. Sue their ass off.We don't need Gestapo Police putting the heat on law abiding citizens. They're supposed to know what the law is,I guess many are clueless.I feel much safer,don't you?

    Comments are closed.