By Dean Weingarten
Arizona – -(Ammoland.com)- Barack Obama made the following statement about “gun violence”.
‘There’s no advanced, developed country on Earth that would put up with this’, he said. ‘This is becoming the norm and we take it for granted in ways that, as a parent, are terrifying to me… If public opinion does not demand change in Congress, it will not change.’
“Gun violence” is a propaganda term. It emphasises violence committed with guns as somehow worse and less appropriate than violence committed with bombs or axes or nerve gas or machetes. This is done to push for political actions that would otherwise not be defensible or acceptable.
Let us put that aside, and assume that Barack Obama really meant that “there is no advanced, developed country on Earth that would put up with this” (meaning the level of unjustified violence in the United States). For the sake of simplification, I will assume that he means unjustified homicides.
What countries does this put outside of Barack Obama's definition of “advanced, developed countries”? Clearly, it means any countries that have a higher level of unjustified homicides than the United States, because in his definition, the United States is higher than any other “advanced, developed country”.
These would include Russia, Ukraine, Estonia, Brazil, Mexico, Jamaica, South Africa, Venezuela, Ecuador, Paraguay, and Chile, as examples.
Rather interesting that Russia is not considered “advanced” or “developed” by Barack Obama.
The article that the chart was taken from at the Crime Prevention Research Center, has a much more sophisticated analysis of the “advanced and developed” scam. It is just another way to cherry pick data to arrive at predetermined conclusions.
We could as easily make up another category, such as “New World Counties” or “Large, multi-ethnic countries”, both of which would show that the U.S. does rather well in comparison to the others. The United States is much closer to Russia in its scope and diversity than it is to Finland. International comparisons are quite complex; simplistic comparisons mislead more than inform.
It is culture that is the predominant factor in homicide rates, not the availability of a certain weapon type. If the culture trusts the justice system and believes that the rule of law will prevail, homicide rates drop like a rock. In the United States there are significant subgroups that do not trust the rule of law, and that is where most of the homicide occurs.
c2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included. Link to Gun Watch
About Dean Weingarten;
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.