H.R.2377; The American-Communist’s Gun Confiscation Bill ~ VIDEO

Dan Wos, Author of – Good Gun Bad Guy
Host of The Loaded Mic
Dan Wos explains the dangers of proposed hr2377, aka/ Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2021.

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)-

H.R.2377 otherwise known as the “Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2021” has been written by the Biden Administration and the Attorney General and introduced into Congress on April 8th, 2021 by Democrat Representative Lucy McBath with 114 co-sponsors (all Democrats).

Should this bill be signed into law, it would give practically anyone the ability to petition the court and have guns taken away from others.

The ability to petition the court is granted to any family or household members, roommates of the respondent, (including former household members), and law-enforcement officers. All the petitioner has to do is submit an affidavit accusing the respondent of posing a risk of imminent personal injury to himself or herself or another individual by purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm or ammunition.

Just a simple accusation is all that’s necessary to enact an ex parte gun confiscation. Ex parte allows one party to make an accusation and law enforcement to execute a gun confiscation without granting the accused the right to respond.

We can imagine how destructive this would be should it be used as a tool for revenge by ex-spouses, former roommates, and angry former boyfriends/girlfriends. There is also the concern that this law would be used as a tool to disarm and render helpless an abused person in a relationship.

If H.R.2377 becomes law, all gun owners will be subjected to the risk of their guns being confiscated from their homes without due process.

Leaving them with the burden and expenses involved with proving their innocence and rebuilding their reputation and good name. H.R.2377 overrides states’ authority leaving all 50 states vulnerable to an overreaching federal gun grab. If tied in with universal background checks, this law would be the tool by which government can take guns from whomever they wish. Universal background checks would provide the list of guns, gun owners, and their locations needed prior to the execution of this National Red Flag Law. So it’s no surprise Democrats are working these two gun control tools in tandem.

The bill is being pushed under the guise of suicide prevention. But in reality, taking away someone’s firearms does not reduce suicides. We learned this after the Australian gun ban, when we actually saw suicides slightly increase. If people want to commit suicide they will find a way. Guns are in no way directly correlated with causing suicide. This is a fantasy created by the gun-grabbers and Democrat Socialists to coerce as many people as possible to get on board with gun control.

This law would in fact create a larger mental health situation by making people less likely to disclose their mental struggles or thoughts of suicide out of the risk of losing their gun rights. This law would actually create an incentive for people to avoid seeking mental health assistance. Former law enforcement would be less likely to seek mental health assistance out of fear of losing their gun rights and possibly making them unemployable for security officers and similar positions. Not only would this law create a larger underground mental health situation, but it would also provide no help to the person being accused. The law is focused specifically on the confiscation of guns with no Addendums or suggestions on how to help the respondent with any mental health issues, should they exist. This law would just aggravate the respondent. We understand that Democrats don’t really want to help those with mental health issues, but they are happy to use mental health issues as an excuse to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens. It would appear that the lawmakers involved are not really concerned with suicide numbers going down, as this bill clearly shows how it would exacerbate an already potential problem.

Democrats want high gun-related death numbers to justify more gun control laws. H.R.2377 is a perfect tool. H.R.2377 is also a way for Democrats to punish gun owners under the strong arm of the law for crimes that never occur.

The 2nd Amendment is not a privilege.
It’s your right.

Dan Wos
Good Gun Bad Guy
Loaded Mic

About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is available for Press Commentary. For more information contact PR HERE

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on the Sean Hannity Show, NRATV, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun-owners.

Dan Wos
Dan Wos
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ever since the creation of the BATF, all gun owners have been subjected to the risk of their guns being confiscated from their homes without due process.

Deplorable Bill

This is tyranny and treason by anyone involved in government, the courts and l e o’s. It is sedition for a civilian to support this. This is a crime on every American citizen even if aimed only at individuals. If you are a righteous American citizen in congress or the courts or in l e, don’t tie your horse to this bill. Tyranny and treason both carry the death penalty. Sooner or later they are going to show up at someone’s home AND THEY WILL ONLY SURRENDER THEIR FIREARMS BULLETS FIRST, AIRMAIL. If this happens, get on social media asap.… Read more »

Ansel Hazen

This is what Militia’s are for. Think of those in the group as extended family watching your 6.


Militia groups of 10 include:
2 BATFE agents
2 FBI agents
1 DEA agent
1 US Marshals Service agent
1 State Highway Patrol officer
1 County deputy
1 City/Town police officer
1 Idiot who thinks he belongs to a militia group


Even in TEXAS??? Say it ain’t so!


It ain’t so.


Whew!!! Now I don’t have to worry about them federal pissants!!!


Hey, you’re not allowed to write “pissants.”

You are not a member of the allowed tribe.


Sorry, meant to make it clear I was mocking the WillTEX M.O.. “PISSANT”.

Deplorable Bill

Yup, as evidenced on 1/6/21, the assumed kidnapping of a criminal governor and most every other situation. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Have no doubt “they” are and have been on this site. Still, we must stand against evil, communism and socialism (different ways of spelling evil), tyranny and treason. Have no doubt “they” are coming but they are not sent by the LORD.

Arm up and carry on


No wonder we are spending so much on law enforcement with such poor results.


Same thing for military is in the NDAA just passed by the House. The NDAA will be passed by the Senate (guaranteed) as Rubio and other RINOs like Dan Crenshaw (yeah, I said it and yes I know he’s in the House) are for red flag laws. Once that has been signed into law they will say that if it is good for the military then it is good for civilians and you can expect enough RINOs to get in line to pass this as well.



Last edited 10 months ago by Hazcat

Unconstitutional, ex parte, presumed guilty without a crime committed, no due process, rights suspended without a trial… only firearms removed while knives and vehicles and gasoline and pharmaceuticals are all left with the supposed dangerous individual, who is not offered any help, counseling or support… ideal statute to criminally violate citizens’ rights and create violence rather than solve any issue.


Where in the Constitution did We the People grant Congress this power? We did not, and so Congress is usurping authority from us, and will continue to do so until we smack them down.

Rebel VA

The time is near!



WI Patriot

Whoever the actual “confiscators” are, it won’t go well for them should they decide to try and implement this…


Thousands of people in Florida have had these laws used against them. I’m not aware of any confiscator being harmed. It’s not helping with their image among the general public, though.

I’m also not aware of any Florida enforcers refusing to confiscate.

WI Patriot

IF you’re so confident, perhaps you should volunteer to be a “confiscator” then…


WI Patriot,

That wasn’t my point.

My point was confiscators are enforcing the laws and getting away with it.

And no, I would never enforce a red flag law.

Last edited 10 months ago by JSNMGC

Right? It seems to be going pretty well for the government thugs. Everyday they violate their oaths and our rights and I’m not hearing anything about people fighting back. Looks like those red flag laws are working exactly as intended.


LEOs just keep doubling down.

It’s going to be a mess, but I think ostracism will be the first phase. The amount of hurt feelings is going to be interesting:

“No one came to my kid’s birthday party because me and my buds took the dentist’s guns because one of my buds told a judge the dentist was dangerous (but really he was just pissed because his girlfried left him for the dentist)? That’s outrageous!”

BTW, did you catch USMC0352Grunt’s opinion on responsibilities and roles?


Oh, yeah, I caught it. It’s a good thing someone came along to tell me my role otherwise I would still be wandering in the wilderness. I’m just waiting in Will to buy those made in Texas suppressors and take a stroll through Deep Ellum with his unregistered suppressed MP5 since the government thugs are no longer enforcing arms laws in Texas.


I’ve never heard a veteran indicate their role is to sit on the sidelines and then step-up after non-veterans have led the way (or refer to non-veterans as one distinct group and veterans being the patriots).


Leaving them with the burden and expenses involved with proving their innocence and rebuilding their reputation and good name.”
Assuming one was to go this route.


“The ability to petition the court is granted to any family or household members, roommates of the respondent, (including former household members), and law-enforcement officers.” There is a subset of LEOs who have low IQs, who are extremely emotional, who are vindictive, who openly express their willingness to use the power of their position to harm people with whom they disagree on political matters, who brag about using techniques designed to escalate situations, who lie, who misrepresent facts, who destroy evidence, who conspire with other LEOs, and who attempt to hide their assets. These laws will be used by them… Read more »

Wild Bill

So, Gerber or Leatherman?


While I know to whom you are referring, the acts and attitude you describe fits Mr. Binger to a tee. Hopefully enough of the jury has the sense to see through the lies and misdirection.