NSSF Applauds Court Order to Block New Jersey’s Frivolous Lawsuit Law

FPC, SAF, NJ2AS Challenge New Jersey Handgun Carry Ban
NSSF, The Firearm Industry Trade Association, welcomed the U.S. District Court of New Jersey’s preliminary injunction order to block a public nuisance law that was recently enacted by Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. IMG iStock

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- NSSF, The Firearm Industry Trade Association, welcomed the U.S. District Court of New Jersey’s preliminary injunction order to block a public nuisance law that was recently enacted by Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. That law allowed frivolous and unconstitutional lawsuits against members of the firearm industry for the subsequent criminal misuse of a lawfully-sold firearm by remote third parties over whom members of the industry have no control. Judge Zahid Quraishi noted that the landmark 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) specifically protects against these baseless lawsuits that have no foundation in a basic understanding of tort law.

“NSSF is pleased by today’s ruling because we know New Jersey’s law is unconstitutional as it is preempted by federal law,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel. “The bottom line is that Congress specifically addressed these sorts of harassing and baseless lawsuits when PLCAA was passed with an overwhelming bipartisan majority and signed into law by President George W. Bush. The court correctly pointed out in its opinion that New Jersey’s law directly conflicts with the intention of Congress.”

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) blocks lawsuits that attempt to hold firearm and ammunition industry companies liable for the criminal actions of third parties who misuse the industry’s lawfully sold, non-defective products. More specifically, this common sense law ensures that responsible and law-abiding federally licensed manufacturers and retailers of firearms and ammunition are not unjustly blamed in federal and state civil actions for “the harm caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse” these products that function as designed and intended.

Today’s decision should give pause to other states considering similar bills modeled on New Jersey’s law before they enact similarly unconstitutional laws that NSSF will challenge on behalf of the firearm industry. NSSF is challenging similar laws recently enacted in New York and Delaware.

NSSF was represented by Clement & Murphy, PLLC, in its challenge to New Jersey’s unconstitutional public nuisance law.


About The National Shooting Sports Foundation

NSSF is the trade association for the firearm industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of thousands of manufacturers, distributors, firearm retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen’s organizations, and publishers nationwide. For more information, visit nssf.org

National Shooting Sports Foundation

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Montana454Casull

Any politician that promotes or sponsors unconstitutional laws needs to be removed from office immediately after the law is determined to be unconstitutional by the SCOTUS for violating the oath they took to uphold the constitution. This would cure the problem .

Desert Rat

That is not enough. Anyone who sponsors unconstitutional laws and all who vote to pass such laws must be tried for treason and given the designated penalty. You only have to hang a few of them for the rest to …….. Screw that, hang them all, you’ll get the guilty;

Sam in New Hampshire

pour encourager les autres. 🙂 🙂

PistolGrip44

Now sue your “industry partners,” the ATF!!!

Rob J

Current Washington State legislation is seeking to impose such a law upon the public.
Senate Bill 5078 and House Bill 1130 are virtual verbatim of N.J.S.A. 2C:58-35 (New Jersey Assembly Bill 1765), which this article deals with.

Proof positive that those who oppose firearm ownership are not concerned with actual law or public nuisance regulation in the name of public safety. Rather, they are once again intent on litigating the industry to its knees in the wake of the Sandy Hook “win” through bankruptcy default.

Vinnie

Kalifornia also passed a law like that recently. I don’t know if anyone is challenging it yet, but they should if not.