Rational arguments in support of gun rights are excluded or denigrated while other research, facing the same alleged shortcomings, is held up as fact. Inane and widely rejected research is presented..
It would seem to me that an intellectually honest educated man without an agenda would use this opportunity to educate those not as intelligent as he.
Why cannot liberals tell the truth? We saw it in the Kavanaugh hearings and now we are seeing a blatant example in a recent bogus mass shooting research paper by Adam Lankford.
One of the more common claims in the gun control debate is that the United States has more mass public shootings than any other countries. That is FAKE NEWS!
Wintemute moves the goalpost from “comprehensive background checks” to “permits to purchase,” which would require law-abiding citizens to get permission from the government before they buy a gun.
The CDC nonfatal injury data is completely unreliable – as the CDC itself admits. Noted anti-gun researcher David Hemenway is quoted as saying, “No one should trust the CDC’s nonfatal firearm injury
In an amusing story, a government-funded media outlet notorious for its liberal slant found that the overwhelming majority of school shootings listed in a federal report never occurred.
Lankford’s study reported that from 1966 to 2012, there were 90 public mass shooters in the U.S. & 202 in the rest of world. Lankford’s data represent a gross undercount of foreign attacks.
The difference between gun violence and fatalities related to motor vehicle accidents or smoking is intent. Traffic accidents are just that – accidents.
Time and again national pollsters insist on reporting how NRA members and other gun owners feel about gun control. Don’t believe a word of it.
A reporter for the Washington Post authored an article with the salacious and misleading headline “2018 has been deadlier for schoolchildren than service members.”
The only thing 100% of American’s would agree on is what we really need is bogus polling and liar control.
When the university announced that they were changing the name of the institution to the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Bloomberg had already given his alma mater more than $100 million…
Given how often questions about defensive gun usage come up, around 116,000 per year to millions, one may wonder why this data was never acknowledged.
Environics took 131 of 1,510 total respondents, and claimed those 131 people represent the views of 2.1 MILLION licensed Canadian gun owners…
The researchers obviously have not attended a NRA Annual Meeting and basic logic & math calls their findings into serious question.
Since New Jersey Democrats are essentially running out of ideas for new gun laws that turn law-abiding citizens into incarcerated criminals, they have introduced a new scheme to undermine the 2A..
Scientific American is following the old CDC model of picking a desired outcome and selectively promoting views and data which support the objective…
Anyone who follows firearm issues knows the “background check” results are totally bogus, and that inaccuracy should cast serious doubt on the “health plan” results as well.
Junk science endangers lives. Forensic junk science in the hands of overzealous prosecutors, ignorant police detectives and reckless experts threatens liberty..
Solar activity in the past has warmed the Earth, and we now must take into consideration the role of the sun in global warming today.
This experience busted the myth for me that Snopes.com is an objective myth buster. Myths are apparently easier to bust than political controversies.
We all know that the gun control community has co-opted the phrase ‘common sense.’ What is ‘common sense’ to them, is foolishness to us.
A group of researchers at the Michael Bloomberg funded Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy & Research did what they are paid to do: deliver “evidence” to support banning guns.
New York’s antigun politicians, however, have an established history of using governmental personnel and resources for purely political purposes.