Hogg Reveals Inner Totalitarian and Wider Democrat Power Struggle

Dressing the part for seizing power…

U.S.A. –(Ammoland.com)- “Dems need to allow young people to seize leadership opportunities like the republicans have with people like Rubio, Ryan etc.,” #Marx… uh… #March for Our Live enfant terrible David Hogg proclaimed in a tweet justifying his criticism of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi as old. “We can go younger.”

That he’s itching for power over others is obvious. Believing in the flattery of his special interest handlers and a fawning press, the high school graduate is champing at the bit to run for Congress as soon as he’s old enough. That his lack of any concrete experience or understanding of the Constitution might give anyone second thoughts is a non-starter: Neither is needed for an ignorance-based popularity contest.

What we’re seeing are the first skirmishes in a war with Old Guard Democrats. And we’re seeing that unfold in places where hard-line leftists are gaining traction and predominance over their more “pragmatic” elders, who are increasingly being perceived as out-of-touch, out-of-date and even obstacles.

Despite having any semblance of qualifications, 28-year-old “Democratic Socialist” darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ousted 10-term incumbent Joe Crowley in New York’s 14th District. And seemingly perpetual California Senator Dianne Feinstein did not get her state party’s automatic nod  – Kevin de León is not only considerably younger, he and Ocasio-Cortez represent a growing demographic that will increasingly factor ethnic interests into its votes.

Time and again Ocasio-Cortez has been shown to be clueless on issues from foreign policy to economics and more, but that doesn’t matter. Look at her district. The guy she beat in the primary got almost 83% of the vote the last time he ran. The only way she can lose is if she does something that gets her arrested and disqualified—and she’d still probably get more votes than the Republican.

True, establishment Dems won't go gentle into that good night, and with their connections and war chests expect to see more races testing the adage that old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill. But what we’re seeing is the coming to power of a monster of the party’s creation. It feeds off an electorate for which manipulated emotions outweigh anything so mundane as rational policy considerations – never the strong suit for the Democrats anyway.

We’re seeing, for lack of a better term, a mobocracy, and that’s exactly what those behind their manufactured Hogg phenomenon are counting on.  And while speaking his mind may have revealed a Freudian slip, it’s just as likely to assume he meant what he said and that his handlers approve when he expresses his intent to “seize leadership opportunities.”

Not “earn.”


That says a lot about the mindset, that political power is something to be seized, and that political opponents are to be disarmed.

The predicted “Blue Wave” is a an obvious ploy to demoralize and psyche out Republican voters, to make them believe going to the polls would be futile. Don’t fall for it, even though some Republicans appear to be trying their damnedest to make it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Back in December I reported on a House race in Virginia that was forced into a recount and a tie-breaker drawing that could have been avoided if just one more gun owner had bothered to vote. That the gun-grabber didn’t win was a matter of luck.

We see what’s at stake with the unprecedented tactics being employed in opposition to Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination hearings. Knowing the importance of how SCOTUS will rule on Second Amendment and other freedom-related cases, it’s imperative that power be denied to those who feel entitled to seize it. It’s imperative that you and I do our parts to keep that from happening.

About David Codrea:David Codrea

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

  • 52 thoughts on “Hogg Reveals Inner Totalitarian and Wider Democrat Power Struggle

    1. Young Mr. Hogg strikes me, likely others too, as Hitler Reincarnated. Having experienced the travail attributal to the earlier one, do we want or need to experience another? I would think not.

    2. Pat, Wild Bill, Trumped; All right on the mark about Hogg, just lets keep the gun out of his hands when they totally throw him under the bus, he is not going to take that well at all!!!!!!!!

    3. In the political culture of complaint and division the Democrats have been creating, David Hogg has a “golden ticket” and is offering it to a wide group. With identity politics based on group “victimization” you need to belong to a group with a claim to being victimized, or having been victimized historically. Hogg and other non-minority males have spent a dozen years in public schools, and will spend another four to six in under-grad and grad, with the message hammered in that every social ill is their fault, that they have a trans generational responsibly for whatever was done hundreds of years ago, and they are the aggressor and exploiter of everyone else in society.
      If you are Elizabeth Warrant you get a golden ticket on the claim you are 1/64 “native” American. If you are the privileged child of two millionaire engineers from Portugal and grew up in the top 1% of Us income, you are “Hispanic” and have your oppressed minority victim golden ticket. You get preferred placement in schools, employment and e ability to tell everyone else that anything negative in your life is society’s fault.
      Poor Hogg has been indoctrinated his whole life that he CAN NO be a victim as a white male (unless he is gay) and that he is iust preemptively and presumptuously at fault for everything — not for any action — but because of birth.
      The ARMBand is key since anyone looking at Hogg in the context and lens of aggrievement identity politics otherwise sees a non minority male and says he is the bad guy since he is male and not a minority. To Democrats Hogg must be judged on his gender and race. His “gun violence” survivor identity armband advertises his victimization and makes him “ok.”
      The armband, like all of Hogg’s messaging, is seductive and very effective messaging in this environment: “Come get your victim flag!” It is a disgusting message but it does work for the intended audience.

      So it is not difficult to figure out why the gun control lobby funds Hogg.

    4. Little sociopath Hoggie does not realize he has no place running for office in the Dem party these days with the victim hierarchy of cultural marxists. He is a white male, so he has no chance over a person of color. Even though he is gay he still does not rank above a minority, so he will have to check his white privilege and step aside. Hogg’s only chance would be to become a trans gender – the one group of whites who rank above minorities in victim status.

      He is power hungry and enough of a sociopath to absolutely try it, too!

    5. American Patriot; she sure did! m b w; Tou-ch’e ! Wild Bill; Right ON! Buck Cassidy; Right, Dust In The Wind; Anything there has blown away a long time ago!! Sam W; worse he is set to be a Dictator for sure!!! Tom Cat; Just like I said, Planned Parenthood Selective Abortions!!!!!!!!! Martin J Camp ; If all you have to do is criticize what is written here, my 1st amendment right is why don’t you read a book???????? NITE ALL!

    6. Sinister and frightful, a proxy for the millions of youth with no future, save what they can wrest from The System. Couple this with the illegal immigrant onslaught, many of whom seek that same ride on the backs of decreasing taxpayers, and we are heading, rapidly, for a societal meltdown. From that, I expect a violent reaction, acts of desperation and of dogma, focused upon the last remaining citizenry of a Constitutional Republic – you, and me. And our numbers are dwindling, while theirs burgeon, rapidly. Cause for alarm, gentlemen.

    7. n. r. ringlee Your right about Trump he has take the Demo-Rats by the tail and it has all of their pantyhose all tied in nots and it’s fun just to sit back to see just how unglued they come, they are really having trouble with their sanity and it really shows more and more every day!!!!! The thing I look at is if what the Republican Party had all of their people going for the nomination and Trump got it , what does that say about the party in general????????

    8. Pistol Pete, Alex, & Mike; Right! tomcat look what they have been working under! JCS HITLER JR! Sam W RIGHT ON!! Rocket Man; Perfect for both, Demo-Rats & Just needs the Tattoos! H E Hogg has over 30 years to do that like Ford!!!!

    9. Unfortunately, a lot of people in this country vote based on immutable characteristics, and not the politician’s viewpoints on relevant matters. DH (correctly) knows that young folk are more likely to vote for young politicians, regardless of their viewpoints. Andrew Gillium’s only playing card is the race card. The socialist Ocasio-Cortez can only play on her looks and age. Of course, groupthink kicks in at that point. Young people will castigate others in their peer group for not voting “their way”. Ethnic groups will scream bloody murder if someone doesn’t toe the “party line”. That sort of thing. Hell, during the 2016 election the last refuge of the HRC supporters was to use gender as a selling point. “Oh, you’re a woman so you gotta vote for her…”

    10. There is a lot to be said about his father being FBI and his mother having a government job, also. I am not saying all employees are bad but it appears the deep swamp spread all the way to Fla.

    11. “I am your MASTER! I created you the serve me! I command you to attack my enemies!”

      That will end well.

    12. Nothing will change UNLESS all the PEOPLE ( who say they are republican) Get out and VOTE to remove these commies from office , maybe than ,and only than , will we be able to get rig of the scum that gets mixed into the pot.

    13. Getting rid of Hitler would have saved a lot of lives
      Getting rid of Hogg know might save a lot of lives latter
      Because he is a little Hitler in the making

      1. There’s no doubt in my mind that when he gets a little older either he’s going to go to prison or into politics. Maybe both.

      2. your 100% right my friend! this little prick would be prancing around in jack boots if he could get away with it,he’s just the type of power hungry little prick that sent millions into the furnace.

      3. That’s the same thing I said about Chelse Clinton, Hillarys munchkin she has already learned the game.

    14. HOGG still hasn’t found his way out of the sand box, when he does he might find out how the real Demo-Rat system works, and how the old guard controls how the purse strings work and gets and who doesn’t, he fits into the doesn’t get section!!!!!!!!!

    15. Good luck Hogg.. Look at who’s in charge in the DNC? All elderly children of royals nieces and nephews. They’re so connected and entitled they can’t run for President. None of them are electable, so they stay tied up in state legislature where they can do the most damage. Hogg when you realize the big banks own the DNC, and you’re a pawn you’ll be old enough to know better.

      1. I doubt it. People like Hogg never get old enough to know better: Look at Despicable DiFi; look at Slithering Hillary; look at Stolen Valor Blumenthal. Look at dozens of other Democrats who are climbing aboard the Democratic Socialist train.

    16. the fight among the D’s is between the old, white D’s and the new, brown D’s. put another way, the fight among the D’s is between socialists and communists.

      as to hogg (small letter intended), it would not be surprising if his heroes were mao, josef, kim, etc. he talks and acts just as they did.

    17. I believe we may be witnessing the death of Progressive New Left methodology in political warfare. It is clear now what happened in 2016. Donald Trump kidnapped Saul Alinsky and his Rules for Radicals and turned that methodology on its head and against its original masters. Since the early 1970’s undergraduates have done revolutionary theater and role play based upon those rules and the methodology of debate derailing and personal destruction. This has served progressive new left ideologues well for nearly five decades. Then along came Donald Trump. Don’t get me wrong, I am no fan, have not been, probably never will be but The Donald deserves credit for taking the full weight of leftist scorn and invective and turning it on the opposition. A few have previously tried to use the Rules against the left but success was only partial. Limbaugh and Hannity come to mind as examples. But The Donald has mastered revolutionary theater and delivers by far the best Alinsky act ever. And that, my friends, is what is driving the New Left insane. Instead of turning the likes of John Boehner in to blubbering pussies leftists now get a full magazine of invective right back in their faces.

      If identity politics, class envy and the Rule for Radicals crumble under the weight of counter attack Progressives of all stripes know they have nothing to fall back upon. We may be witnessing the last ditch, final protective fires of a dying movement. To that I say God Bless America

      1. Yup. Methinks you’ve got it pretty well sussed out there. Except that Alinsky and his ilk were alinve, well, and raging in the mid-1960’s I got duped by them for a season, but when one of their Choir Boys, Nelson Mandela, began to perpetrate his atricoties in South Africa and was hailed as a hero, then the Manson murders…… I swaw the light and eased off into that good night.
        But your observations are very astute. I believe The DOnald gets his scrappy In Yer Face Suckah ‘tude from being raised in Noo Yawk with its silly power games and tough guy posing, then off into the nasty part of the big business world. I despised him for his arrogance the few tiems I watched his TeeVee show.. the one that always ended with YOU”RE FIRED. He was crass, inconsiderate, arrogant, but he got the job done. Seems with the steady deterioration in quality with partcularly the Dem congresscritters and their multiple minions Mr. Donald J Trump is precisely what the doctor ordered. Can you ever imagine people like Mc Cain, Romney, Huckabee, actually standing up in their faces like Trump does? The only one I can think of that could have come anywhere close is Ron Paul, but his biggest problem is he’d been IN politics for a generation and they all thought they had him wired.. and the party machine “decided” him out of the running. Trump came froun out of nowhere, and the PEOPLE, having sickened of the nine year dabacle that was the kinyun, and the very real prospect of the Clinton She Unit ruling us all, it seems we as a group decided to put out nuckel on Trump. HOW could he be worse than the Pantsuit Queene? Now the Pantsuit Queene and her tribe have all their panties in a twist as Trump calls their bets and raises them five.

        1. This excellent post sums it up nicely. Nobody else could have beat HRC. The New York personality is what rubs so many the wrong way. Our new POTUS is getting the job done but I fear for the Republic if the Left continues their slow-motion coup. The Swamp is so much deeper and more slimy than we thought.

    18. It’s obvious that intelligence or an understanding of our Constitution is not a prerequisite for serving in congress as demonstrated daily by our elected officials. This guy will fit right in.

    19. I fully support David Hogg’s God given, Constitutionally enshrined, American Civil Right to be a unemployed, emotional, non-thinking, oddball. If Pelosi has any sense in her booze soaked brain, she will crush this skraling before he gets a start in the Democrat National Socialist party.

      1. NOOO, let him and his entitled little wanker mates in as well.
        With a little luck they will start the process of the dumocraps tearing themselves apart.
        For the uneducated, (wanker) is Australian for chronic masturbator , idiot, dickhead etc.

      1. Photoshop may have been used to change his shirt from brown to white, and to delete the Hakenkreuz (“Swastika”) from his armband. (sarcasm ontended)

      2. Very real so armband gunconteol junk his sister came up with. He only wore it for a bit before people pointed out HE looked like a National Socialist Party member

      3. Yep, it’s real. His sister and he came up with the armband idea shortly after the Parkland shooting and their media tour was beginning to be a viable idea. Someone pointed out the bad optics and the parallels that could and would be drawn and they dropped the idea.

      4. My bet it that this narcissistic stick boy has Nazi paraphernalia in his bedroom. Can you imagine your life with his type in power? I see a “guns for me but not for thee” look on his smug little face. I see the armed guards with the straight faces looking out into the crowd of disarmed Hitler youth. On and on…the little puke.

        1. If you look at the videos of his summer tour several armed guards are pointed out, so your comment of ‘guns for me but not for thee’ is spot on.

    20. I think it is time for all Democrats to take a good look at where the party is now and where it’s headed and ask themselves what side do they want to be on.
      The Republicans are not exactly a prize but they stand a better chance to lead America to a better place and maintain freedom.

    21. National Rifle Association (NRA) : http://www.membership.nrahq.org
      o Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) : http://www.saf.org
      o Firearms Coalition: http://www.firearmscoalition.org
      o Jews For the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) : http://www.jpfo.org
      o Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) : http://www.ccrkba.org
      o Gun Owner of America (GOA) : http://www.gunowners.org
      And, please consider support for the Second Front in Defense of the Second Amendment:
      o Knife Rights: http://www.kniferights.org

      Building a following on the death and blood of his classmates, how quaint. Reminiscent of history, when another named Adolf who built his following on the death and blood of the Jews, along with anyone else who was considered the enemy of the state. Very dangerous precedent. It is time to squelch these actions before it continues any further. It is time for this child to be educated in the history of Western Civilization. Even a crash course would be recommended.

      Anti-constitutionalist’s sense of morality is situational, based on incident and emotion, instead of rooted in God’s word and law.
      Anti-constitutionalist’s stand for nothing. The situation determines their support for an issue and their emotions rule, not reason and rationality.
      Moreover, they recognize the contradiction, but still cling to their situational justice. Situational justice is the tool of dictators, tyrants, despots, and unjust, unrighteous monarchs. It has no place in a free constitutional republic. In which the United States of America is……………….

      Author:”Rhodney Freeman”
      “In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
      China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
      Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
      56 million defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:
      You won’t see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
      Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
      Take note my fellow Americans, before it’s too late”!

      The opponents of gun rights come in four fundamental categories:

      Utopian Idealists – Dreamers willing to ignore human nature (anger, hostility, temper, greed, lust, hunger, poverty, want, megalomania, social pathologies, etc.) in the vain hope for a world where no one ever needs to defend themselves or others; Result: misguided efforts to disarm the public since no one should ever be capable of exerting lethal force for any reason. Fairly rare.

      Routine Bigots – Ignorant gun haters who, generally, have never actually seen a real gun much less fired one, and hate what they don’t know; strong corollaries with race haters; Result: Vigorous anti-rights profile if left alone, however they often resolve their blind hatred when education removes the ignorance — frequent anecdotes of such folks “converting” after their first time at a range. Quite common.

      Hoplophobes — Unfortunate souls afflicted with a phobic terror of firearms, deserving of pity, and in need of medical attention; Result: Though they should never be involved in setting policy on self-defense, national security, or Second Amendment rights, they often insinuate themselves into such positions, their need for treatment goes unattended, and they cause grievous social harm. Easily mistaken for plain bigots. Too common.

      Power Mongers – Like some at the U.N or many anti-gun-rights politicians, they know full well that an armed public interferes with their plans, and they insidiously use lies about the gun issue, and “disarmament (of you but not them) as a road to peace” as a power base and source of support; Result: truly evil, tyrants’ who ultimately suppress human rights, contribute to global genocides, live an elite lifestyle, care not for their fellow citizens. Rare but extremely dangerous.

      Example of the Sickness:

      “My own view on gun control is simple: I hate guns and I cannot imagine why anybody would want to own one. If I had my way, guns for sport would be registered, and all other guns would be banned.”
      –Deborah Prothrow-Stith, Harvard School of Public Health

      The right of decent private citizens to personally possess, transport, and responsibly use arms without government interference is the ultimate freedom and the main pillar supporting all other liberties. Few cultures have allowed their general population access to weapons, the tools of power, to the same degree as the United States. Instead, most societies have restricted the keeping and bearing of arms to a select few power brokers and their agents, often resulting in oppression on a grand scale.
      Despite a massive amount of historical evidence to the contrary, there is a substantial body of Americans, many occupying positions of influence, who contend that the abrogation of the Second Amendment is the quickest path to domestic tranquility. Since this is as absurd as advocating blood-letting as a cure for anemia, it would seem advisable to question the motives and mentalities of the gun control advocates themselves.
      In my observation, weapon prohibitionists can be broken down into seven major categories. Even though their motives may vary they all pose a mortal threat to liberty.

      Many of those in favor of oppressive firearms legislation are best classed as elitists. Elitists frequently identify with a peer group based on wealth, power, rank, social status, occupation, education, ethnic group, etc. and perceive themselves and their peers as inherently superior to and more responsible than the “common people”, thus more deserving of certain rights. Since elitists practically consider those outside their class or caste as members of another species, that most anti-elitist list of laws, the Bill of Rights is viewed by them as anathema. Naturally, the Second Amendment is their first target as it serves as the supporting structure for other nine amendments.

      Another type of individual who favors the restriction of private gun ownership is the authoritarian. Authoritarian personalities are characterized by their belief in unquestioning obedience to an authority figure or group and a disdain for individual freedom of action, expression, and judgement. Those with authoritarian personalities function well in symbiosis with elitists occupying positions of power. Because authoritarians repress their desires for autonomy they harbor a deep resentment toward free and independent thinkers. Of course, authoritarians do not want firearms in the hands of the general population as this constitutes a major obstacle to fulfilling their pathological and obsessive desire to control people.

      It goes without saying that career criminals would like to see the public disarmed for obvious reasons. A well-armed population makes crimes such as assault, robbery, and burglary hazardous for the perpetrator and this is bad for “business.” Also, even non-violent or “white collar” criminals live in constant fear of retribution from the public that they financially bleed and would therefore prefer that the public be disarmed. Evidence supporting this hypothesis can be gathered by studying the Second Amendment voting records of those legislators who have been convicted of willful misconduct.

      Cowards are easily or excessively frightened by things and situations that are recognized as dangerous, difficult, or painful. It therefore stands to reason that the mere thought of guns and the circumstances in which they are employed causes them abnormal amounts of stress. Rather than admit their weakness to themselves or others, some fearful types jump on the anti-gun bandwagon and purport moral superiority to those “barbaric” enough to employ lethal force against armed assailants by claiming various humanitarian and pragmatic motives for allowing evil to remain unchecked. Many of these individuals harbor an envy induced resentment toward anyone with the means, skill, and will to successfully stand up to criminal aggression.
      The desire to assert oneself exists in nearly everyone, wimps included, so cowards seek out tame enemies against whom they can ply their pitiful brand of machismo. Instead of the sociopaths who commit acts of wanton aggression with guns, guns themselves and responsible gun owners are the main targets of their attacks. After all, real criminals are dangerous, so cowards prefer doing battle with inanimate objects that do not have a will of their own and decent law-abiding people whose high level of integrity and self-discipline prevent them from physically lashing out against mere verbal assailants, however obnoxious they may be.

      Ideological chameleons follow the simple social strategy of avoiding controversy and confrontation by espousing the beliefs of the people in their immediate vicinity or advocating the philosophy of those who scream the loudest in a debate. Quite a few supposedly pro Second Amendment public officials have shown themselves to be ideological chameleons when they supported restrictions on the private possession of military style semiautomatic rifles following recent atrocities in which such firearms were employed. Like their reptilian namesake, people who merely blend in with the ambient philosophical foliage seem to have little insight into the moral and social ramifications of their actions. Political and/or economic gain along with avoidance of confrontation are their only goals.

      Security monopolists are those members and representatives of public and private security providing concerns who want the means of self-protection out of private hands so that they can command high fees for protecting the citizenry against the rising tide of crime. These profiteers stand to lose a great deal of capital if citizens can efficiently defend themselves. To the security monopolist, each criminal who enters and exits the revolving door of justice is a renewable source of revenue providing jobs for police, social workers, victim counsellors, judges, prison employees, security guards, burglar alarm installers, locksmiths, and others employed by the security monopolies or their satellite organizations. No wonder it is so common for an honest citizen to be more ruthlessly hounded by the authorities when he shoots a criminal in self-defense than a criminal who shoots honest citizens.

      Just as a limb will weaken and atrophy if not used, so will aspects of the mind fail to develop if nothing in one’s environment exists to challenge them. People who have led excessively sheltered lives tend to have a difficult time understanding certain cause and effect relationships and an even harder time appreciating just how cruel the world can be. These dysfunction ally unworldly types are truly perplexed at the very notion of firearms ownership regarding defense. To them, tyranny and crime are things that happen in other places far removed from their “civilized” universe. Also, they do not understand the value of private property and why some people would fight for theirs since they never had to work hard to acquire what they possess. While those suffering from dysfunctional unworldliness are most often people who have been born into considerable wealth, this condition is also common in members of the clergy, academicians, practioners of the arts, and others who have spent much of their lives cloistered in a safe and pampering environment. While many of these people may be quite talented and intelligent in some ways, their extreme naivety makes them easy prey for the tyrants who use them for the financial support and favorable advertisement of their regimes. The anti-gun movement is well represented and financed by the dysfunction ally unworldly.
      The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, and it behooves all vigilant lovers of liberty to know and be able to recognize the various types of arms prohibitionists and understand their differing but equally dangerous motives. Acquiring knowledge of one’s foes is the first step toward defeating them. We must never forget that a threat to private firearms ownership is a threat to all freedoms.
      The inalienable and fundamental right to keep and bear arms which is enumerated by (but predates) the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is not about hunting, gun collecting, or target shooting. Its purpose is to ensure that every responsible American personally possesses the means to defend the Republic from all forms of tyranny, within and without. It is what permits the other nine Amendments in the Bill of Rights to be more than mere hollow phrases on a piece of paper. Its free exercise is the antithesis of serfdom and the only meaningful form of holocaust insurance known to man.
      We must never insult and degrade the spirits of our Founding Fathers by permitting the Second Amendment, the pillar of freedom, to be destroyed by the cold flame of legislative ink.

      I Stand Behind You In Line

      I stand behind you in line at the store with a smile on my face…and a gun under my shirt and you are none the wiser, yet you are safer for having me next to you. I won’t shoot you. My gun won’t pull it’s own trigger. It is securely holstered with the trigger covered. It can’t just go off. However, rest assured that if a lunatic walks into the grocery store and pulls out a rifle, I will draw my pistol and protect myself and my family and therefore protect you and your family. I may get shot before I can pull the trigger…but, I won’t die in a helpless blubbering heap on the floor begging for my life or my child’s life. No, if I die it will be in a pile of spent shell casings. I won’t be that victim. I choose not to be. As for you, I don’t ask you to carry a gun. If you are not comfortable, then please don’t. But I would like to keep my right to choose to not be a helpless victim. There is evil in the world and if evil has a gun, I want one too…

    22. This little Hitler needs to shutdown ASAP..!!! Another walking, talking Commie/Nazi/NWO/DemoRat piece of SH1T..!!! Hogg is a snapshot of the overall Commie/Nazi/NWO/DemoRat party..!!! This November the RED WAVE needs to be so large they “We the People” (Patriots) will overwhelm the voter fraud from the Commie/Nazi/DemoRat/Left..!!! When I see Hogg I see EVIL is as EVIL does..!!!

    23. Look at Difi’s attacks on Kavanaugh and imagine people like Camera Hogg and Ocrazio-Cortex in her place. They are, like it or not, the future of the Democrat party.

      1. Regardless of whether or not they are the future of the democratic party the danger is is that they are in office and, We, the People allowed this to happen on OUR watch.

      2. By 2040, the former USA may have become the USSA, ruled by the likes of this poofter, David ‘Media” Hogg and the Ragin’ ‘Rican, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. We need to develop “un par de cojones,” (a pair of balls) to save our beloved Republic from their Marxist talons.

      3. which is ackshully some good news. If they had a viable platform and decent honest citizens standing for office, they’d be with us for a good long while yet. I’m glad they’re getting increasingly outrageous. This recent business of jamtart party girls waking up after three plus decades and suddenly “remembering” certain scenaria has many people revolted and disgusted in a way no bad politics could ever create.

        As to Hogg Boyy, all he needs is for a friendlyl little cattypiller to crawl up and stretch himself out horizontally just under his schnozz……. a banded wooly bear would be just about right.

    Comments are closed.