FOIA Seeks Information from DOJ on National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center

Spreading the Biden Administration’s citizen disarmament agenda throughout the land. (The United States Department of Justice/Facebook)

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request was filed Tuesday with the Department of Justice by this correspondent to obtain information on the newly announced National Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) Resource Center.

“[The Center]  will provide training and technical assistance to law enforcement officials, prosecutors, attorneys, judges, clinicians, victim service and social service providers, community organizations, and behavioral health professionals responsible for implementing laws designed to keep guns out of the hands of people who pose a threat to themselves or others,” the Office of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Justice announced Saturday.

“The establishment of the Center is the latest example of the Justice Department’s work to use every tool provided by the landmark Bipartisan Safer Communities Act to protect communities from gun violence,” Attorney General Merrick Garland declared.

Democrats continually remind the public the bill was “bipartisan” because it helps them sell infringements as “commonsense gun safety laws” to voters not steeped in such matters beyond how the media influences them. Gun owners who are protective of their rights consider the “compromises” made by Republicans, many of whom owe their seats to Second Amendment activism, continued inexcusable examples of betrayals that are, at best, foolish and naive. In this case, it’s one more example of the all-too-foreseeable consequences when Republicans, trying to appear “reasonable,” either let Democrats outsmart them or hide that they were in on the fix from the start.

That ERPOs, or “red flag laws,” or however they normalized to allow for the denial of a fundamental right without a citizen even being charged with a crime let alone convicted of one, is a gun prohibitionist’s dream. That even Donald Trump, who has pledged Second Amendment fidelity to adoring masses of gun owners, has advocated “take the gun first, go through due process second,” ought to wake them up, but all too often provokes an angry response from the true believers.

Because information regarding the formation of the Center is of public interest, particularly to gun owners who have a personal and legal stake in the way it operates, with whom, and how it achieves mission objectives, the FOIA request seeks records to include:

  • All records regarding the creation of the “National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center,” including but not limited to all communications, emails, memoranda, recorded telephone calls, text messages, and notes;
  • All records, including but not limited to all communications, emails, memoranda, recorded telephone calls, text messages, and notes from any individual or group to and from the Department of Justice regarding the “National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center;” and
  • Any legal citations/correspondence/analysis used in the development of the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center’s purpose, scope, and objective demonstrating consistency with the Supreme Court’s Bruen standard of text, history, and tradition at the time the Constitution was ratified.

Who the DOJ is partnering with and how their activities are lawful in light of the Supreme Court’s latest ruling on the Second Amendment are of particular interest.

The FOIA request, filed by attorney Stephen D. Stamboulieh, is embedded below.


About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stag

Never forget that the NRA wanted this.

https://youtu.be/A8ijtVkTCCQ?si=U0yTZLfwuTOHTivC

Several “red states” with Republican governors and Republican majorities, Florida for example, have enacted or refuse to repeal red flag laws.

There are many Republicans in Congress and even one running for President that have voiced support for red flag laws. Be mindful of who you’re voting for. Don’t assume our rights will be better defended just because that politician has a R next to their name.

Laddyboy

These TWO NAZI sympothizers need to be ARRESTED, CHARGED with TREASON aganist America, Prosecuted to the FULLEST EXTENT of the TRUE CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS and JUDGED HONESTLY by a TRIBUNAL and PUNISHED APPROPRIATELY!!!

grant

Garland doesn’t know what it is,
He will refer you to Dettelbach

Arizona

Trump should immediately fire all the employees and transform the office into a 2nd amendment resource center, that funds and encourages shooting ranges, competitive shooting, hunting, home protection classes, room clearing kill houses and militia squad tactics. Oh my God, how their heads would implode! Plus, it’s the right thing to do!

gregs

erpo’s/red flag laws are unconstitutional from the get go. they let virtually anyone file an action/complaint against someone without valid proof of them being a danger to themself or others. they do not let the accused face their accuser. there is no repercussions for filing a false report. they confiscate property from the entire family living in the home with no guarantee of getting it back. they do not require or ensure that the person who supposedly is a danger to themself or others has to get appropriate mental health. there are no positive aspects to these laws only negative,… Read more »

musicman44mag

If you are going to have ERPO laws here is how I suggest they work. The police knock on the door, they ask how they are doing, report that a complaint was filed, by whom it was filed and then ask them to confirm if there is a problem or not and what it is. If they get irate and are threatening saying things that threaten the person in question, themselves or the police then by all means take the guns especially if they appear to be high on drugs. If they are calm, relaxed and slightly perturbed but do… Read more »