So Marco Rubio and Lindsey Graham are going to put limitations on how the states can administer federally-funded “red flag” programs? See how long that lasts if the Democrats take it all in 2020…
The antis not only want your guns, they want you treated like terrorists…
The thing is, every one of the entries could be preceded by statements of fact to put things in perspective, such as “Victims killed in enforced ‘gun-free zones’” or “Gun laws utterly failed.”
Why don’t we know his name, yet the narrative-advancing tip that the armed maniac was “a white male in his 30s” is now known to all?
BIDS provides an opportunity to expose the background check frauds for the liars they are, and to prove they are really after registration.
That pretend warrior Stallone should call on government raids to disarm millions of real veterans and the rest of his countrymen goes beyond hypocritical. It’s contemptible.
Genuine common sense comes through loud and clear in Shean’s book…
The gun-grabbers want to make it easy to find out who has what to help them reach the bottom of Nancy Pelosi’s slippery slope.
This is the kind of gun-grabbing Republican we’ll get if we listen to the “moderates.”
Who thinks, once in place throughout the land, that those in power won’t throw “red flags” for other reasons…?
Undeniable betrayal is what will finally be the last straw for perhaps a critical mass of disillusioned gun-owning voters.
Compare violence in El Paso to that of its conjoined twin across the border, Ciudad Juárez, with its “restrictive gun laws.”
What those who voted for the president based on his campaign platform have seen play out time and again is that Donald Trump is an avatar for them.
By NOT identifying the mutant, we are dependent on what “officials” and their approved media megaphones tell us…
The object here is to take Watts’ advice and “Fight Like a Mother,” and since when has reality mattered to them?
See anything that would have made a damn bit of difference in any of these stories?
If you take that criminal population out of the equation, responsible citizens are quite capable of coexisting with firearms…
Playing fast and loose with talking point terminology is evident right out of the starting gate…
If the president’s message is aimed at any color, it’s the Reds.
The useful young idiot du jour is just being used to manipulate the emotions of low-information voters…
What’s really insane is taking firearms away from a known danger and then leaving him free to stalk among us.
[H]e is all for controlling gun owners who do not share his degenerate self-control issues.
Democrats aren’t the only ones trying to get the feds to fund state infringements…
This is hardly the Immaterial Girl’s first foray into citizen disarmament advocacy.
As for failing to improve security, those enjoying a monopoly of violence who have failed to improve it themselves would say that.
I just got done creating a White House petition. “Recognize that the government does not ‘give citizens the right to bear arms,’’ it asks…
Nobody in government gave us that right, so it’s not theirs to try and take away.
It is no different than any gun owner saying and meaning “Molon Labe.”
This is the guy whose self-defense acumen includes advising us to fire shotguns through doors, or off of balconies into the darkness.
But for the risks and punishments of getting caught, authorities are making a pretty good case for “Shoot, shovel and shut up.”
Posts navigation