Once the headlines have been absorbed, reinforced biases will make unquestioning voters receptive to politicians promising more disarmament legislation.
Flawed Right-to-Carry ‘Study’ Bolsters Agenda against Guns
America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
He is a blogger at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance. https://waronguns.com/
View all of Davids work by clicking here: https://tinyurl.com/q8j9dnf
Once the headlines have been absorbed, reinforced biases will make unquestioning voters receptive to politicians promising more disarmament legislation.
The real objection is to any American having rights forcibly stripped without full due process.
That public officials will open carry while the practice has been criminalized for the whole people is exactly opposite of what was intended.
Everyone has opinions. There’s no indication that the respondents have informed ones. And that’s what Watts is counting on.
Obey or refuse to comply, and decide which choice endangers life and liberty the least.
He claims “over 95% of gun crime in Australia involves illegally imported guns” and then proposes what he calls “a happy medium” we all should be able to live with.
Why should an erroneously denied individual be on the hook for thousands of dollars to fix the government’s mistake?
In an honest report, armed citizens saving the day would have been the headline.
That seems to be the message of “Only Ones” everywhere, including here in the U.S.
“The National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) is insufficient for criminal proceedings…”
The elites who can afford armed security details aren’t affected by edicts imposed on commoners.
Just ask yourself which you would rather have: U.S. sovereignty or the approval of some drunken Luxembourgian with delusions of global governance?
If the provocative words attributed to Barbeau were actionable, we’d have seen criminal charges. They are irrelevant to the core issue.
Can there really be such a thing as a “pro-gun Democrat”?
It’s better for the ultimate unity of the community if legislative differences are resolved…
So it’s not so much an “advocacy group” issuing organizational advisories as it is individual sellout “artists” assuming a role of masked propagandists in their “art.”
These elite establishment LEOs are the epitome of “Only Ones,” those who presume themselves to be trustworthy and competent enough to carry guns.
What those who would suppress freedom can’t abide is those who do not fear their hateful name-calling.
“Work on the bill represented coordination among the National Rifle Association, the Alliance for Gun Responsibility, law enforcement organizations and victim’s rights groups.”
Field had time to reach his phone and to send a text message.
The bottom line, as with guns, if performance cars are abused in a way that endangers the public, there are better ways to deal with that.
When you don’t actually have an argument, just resort to stunts, deception, and manipulation.
“[The New Jersey statute] is declared unconstitutional in that it violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and shall not be enforced.”
Artificially limiting what is allowed to be presented — and by whom — limits NRA member choices.
Banishing USCCA may have something to do with NRA recently launching very similar insurance products.
From the point of view of those who would rule them, these brave Patriots committed treason.
The one inescapable fact is Virginia Tech was a “gun-free” campus.
New Jersey Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino has agreed that the state’s total ban on electronic arms is unconstitutional..
Note what it didn’t say? What additional laws they want.
Are YouTube and social media giants Facebook and Twitter discriminating against conservatives and gun owners? And if so, what can be done about it?